Advertisement

Toyetics and Novelizations: Bringing The LEGO Movie to the Page

  • Joyce GogginEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, author Joyce Goggin explores novelizations of The LEGO Movie and The LEGO Batman Movie from selected critical perspectives. Her analysis sheds light on the industry, the readers of these texts, and the possible reasons why women have written the majority of LEGO’s film novelizations. In discussing the industry, Goggin draws upon the work of scholars who have approached commercial writing as a feminist issue, while arguing that the predominance of female LEGO Movie novelization authors relates to the subject of these texts: namely, cute toys and their scaled-down adventures. In so doing, Goggin genders issues as they relate to novelizations and to women’s supposed role as nurturers.

References

  1. Baetens, J. (2019). Novelization: From film to novel. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Corporate Harlequin. (n.d.). https://corporate.harlequin.com/. Accessed on July 25, 2019.
  3. Crume, V. (1968). The parent trap. New York: Scholastic Book Services.Google Scholar
  4. Davies, W. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, B. (2017). The LEGO Batman Movie: Rise of the rogues. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  6. Eliot, G. (2006/1856). Silly novels by lady novelists. In The Norton anthology of English literature (8th ed., pp. 1342–1349). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Goggin, J. (2017a). Affective marketing and the kuteness of kiddles. In J. Dale, J. Goggin, J. Leyda, A. McIntyre, & D. Negra (Eds.), The aesthetics and affects of cuteness (pp. 216–235). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Goggin, J. (2017b). “Everything is awesome”: The LEGO movie and the affective politics of security. J. Morris & N. Boy (Eds.), Special Issue: Finance and Society, 3(2), 143–158.  https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v3i2.2574.
  9. Goggin, J. (2018). “How do those Danish bastards sleep at night?”: Fan labour and the power of cuteness. S. Giddings & A. Harvey (Eds.), Special Issue: Ludic Economies, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018760918.
  10. Goggin, J. (2019). “Everything is awesome”: Spreadable stories and the LEGO movie. Forthcoming. In J. Fehrle & W. Schäfke (Eds.), Adaptation in the age of media convergence. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hardt, M. (1999). Affective labour. Boundary 2, 26(2), 89–100.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, A. (n.d.). About Anna Holmes. https://www.amazon.com/Anna-Holmes/e/B00NB2IAL0?ref=dbs_p_pbk_r00_abau_000000. Accessed on July 17, 2019.
  13. Holmes, A. (2014). Emmet’s awesome day. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  14. Howard, K. (2013). LEGO: The LEGO movie: Junior novel. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  15. Hutcheon, L. (2006). Adaptation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lane, J. (2016). The LEGO Batman Movie: Junior novel. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  17. Lazzarato, M. (n.d.). Immaterial labour. http://www.generation-online.org/c/fcimmateriallabour3.htm. Accessed on July 17, 2019.
  18. Lorenz, K. (1971). Part and parcel in human and animal societies (R. Martin, Trans.). In Studies in animal and human behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 115–195). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mahlknecht, J. (2012). The Hollywood novelization: Film as literature or literature as film promotion? Poetics Today, 33(2), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGee, M. (2005). Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover Culture in American Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McRobbie, A. (2010). Reflections on feminism, immaterial labour and the post-Fordist regime. New Formations, 70, 60–76.Google Scholar
  22. Merish, L. (1996). Cuteness and commodity aesthetics. In R. G. Thompson (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (pp. 185–206). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Murray, S. (2012). The adaptation industry: The cultural economy of contemporary literary adaptation. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell, K. (2017). Expanding adaptation networks: From illustrations to novelization. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ngai, S. (2012). Our aesthetic categories: Zany, cute, interesting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Orr, C. (2009, November 5). Toyetic. Retrieved from The New Republic website https://newrepublic.com/article/70952/toyetic.
  27. Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rusu, M. (2019). About Meredith Rusu. https://meredithrusu.com/about-author-meredith-rusu/. Accessed on July 17, 2019.
  29. Soderberg, E. (n.d.). On writing. Erin Soderbergh: Books for kids (and fun adults!). http://erinsoderberg.com/on_writing. Accessed on July 17, 2019.
  30. The LEGO Movie—Fan Made Films—Official Warner Bros. UK. (2014, August 11). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSSZJxDsjew. Accessed on July 17, 2019.
  31. Thoma, P. (2014). What Julia knew: Domestic labor in the recession-era chick-flick. In D. Negra & Y. Tasker (Eds.), Gendering the recession: Media culture in an age of austerity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Van Parys, T. (2009). The study of novelisation: A typology and secondary bibliography. Literature/Film Quarterly, 37(4), 305–317.Google Scholar
  33. Verevis, C. (2017). Film novelization. In J. Grossman & R. B. Palmer (Eds.), Adaptation in visual culture (pp. 3–19). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations