This chapter touches on UK policy activity around achievement and measurement of wellbeing, including nationwide measurements of life satisfaction and financial indicators of flourishing such as GDP. The complexities of ‘wellbeing’, a wide-ranging concept with a large number of definitions, are explored. Its hedonic and eudaimonic aspects and non-subjective and subjective measurements of it are critically discussed. The pilot Good from Woods framework for understanding and exploring woodland wellbeing is introduced. It proposed that woodland wellbeing could be holistically mapped in relation to five main domains or categories of human experience: emotional, psychological, social, physical and biophilic. The sets of ‘indicators’ associated with each domain, feelings, behaviours and experiences that suggest wellbeing is being supported are described, foregrounding their use within the case study chapters.
- Abdallah, S., Steuer, N., Marks, M., & Page, N. (2008). Well-being evaluation tools: A research and development project for the Big Lottery Fund, New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/wellbeing_evaluation_tools.pdf.
- Bacon, N., Brophy, M., Mguni, N., Mulgan, G., & Shandro, A. (2010). The state of happiness: Can public policy shape people’s wellbeing and resilience?. London: The Young Foundation.Google Scholar
- Brekke, K., & Howarth, R. B. (2002). Status, growth and the environment: Goods as symbols in applied welfare economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E. (2000). National differences in subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–452). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35420/1/measuring-subjective-wellbeing-for-public-policy.pdf.
- Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Goodenough, A. (2015). Social cohesion and wellbeing deriving from woodland activities: Good from woods (A Research Report to the BIG Lottery).Google Scholar
- Horowitz, D. (2018). Happier? The history of a cultural movement that aspired to transform America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods. New York: Workman Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), e0177186.Google Scholar
- Michaelson, J., Abdallah, S., Steuer, N., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2009). National accounts of well-being: Bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet. Retrieved from http://cdn.media70.com/national-accounts-of-well-being-report.pdf.
- Mulholland, H., & Watt, N. (2010). David Cameron defends plans for wellbeing index. The Guardian. Retrieved https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/nov/25/david-cameron-defends-wellbeing-index.
- O’Brien, L. (2009). Wellbeing, forestry and ecosystem services: A discussion paper. Forest Research. Retrieved from http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/Forestry_and_wellbeing_discussion_paper.pdf/$FILE/Forestry_and_wellbeing_discussion_paper.pdf.
- Richardson, M., Hunt, A., Hinds, J., Bragg, R., Fido, D., Petronzi, D. …, & White, M. (2019). A measure of nature connectedness for children and adults: Validation, performance, and insights. Sustainability, 11(12), 3250.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In R. M. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). Suffolk: The University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1103–1119.Google Scholar
- Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2008). Measuring well-being in policy: Issues and applications. New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.Google Scholar
- White, S. (2018). Moralities of wellbeing (Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing; No. 58/2018, pp. 1–17). Bath: Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (2009). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In D. J. Penn & I. Mysterud (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems (pp. 249–258). New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar