Advertisement

Framing Complexity in Wellbeing

  • Alice GoodenoughEmail author
  • Sue Waite
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter touches on UK policy activity around achievement and measurement of wellbeing, including nationwide measurements of life satisfaction and financial indicators of flourishing such as GDP. The complexities of ‘wellbeing’, a wide-ranging concept with a large number of definitions, are explored. Its hedonic and eudaimonic aspects and non-subjective and subjective measurements of it are critically discussed. The pilot Good from Woods framework for understanding and exploring woodland wellbeing is introduced. It proposed that woodland wellbeing could be holistically mapped in relation to five main domains or categories of human experience: emotional, psychological, social, physical and biophilic. The sets of ‘indicators’ associated with each domain, feelings, behaviours and experiences that suggest wellbeing is being supported are described, foregrounding their use within the case study chapters.

References

  1. Abdallah, S., Steuer, N., Marks, M., & Page, N. (2008). Well-being evaluation tools: A research and development project for the Big Lottery Fund, New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/wellbeing_evaluation_tools.pdf.
  2. Adler, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and recommendations. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2017). New statistics for old?—Measuring the wellbeing of the UK. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 180(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacon, N., Brophy, M., Mguni, N., Mulgan, G., & Shandro, A. (2010). The state of happiness: Can public policy shape people’s wellbeing and resilience?. London: The Young Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2008). Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(81), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brekke, K., & Howarth, R. B. (2002). Status, growth and the environment: Goods as symbols in applied welfare economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their well-being? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within Young Lives. Social Indicators Research, 90, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (2000). The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (2000). National differences in subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–452). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Napa Scollon, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(10), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35420/1/measuring-subjective-wellbeing-for-public-policy.pdf.
  15. Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 359, 1367–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodenough, A. (2015). Social cohesion and wellbeing deriving from woodland activities: Good from woods (A Research Report to the BIG Lottery).Google Scholar
  20. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horowitz, D. (2018). Happier? The history of a cultural movement that aspired to transform America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jordan, B. (2008). Welfare and well-being: Social value in public policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahn, P. H. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Keyes, C., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-Being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods. New York: Workman Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), e0177186.Google Scholar
  29. Michaelson, J., Abdallah, S., Steuer, N., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2009). National accounts of well-being: Bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet. Retrieved from http://cdn.media70.com/national-accounts-of-well-being-report.pdf.
  30. Mulholland, H., & Watt, N. (2010). David Cameron defends plans for wellbeing index. The Guardian. Retrieved https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/nov/25/david-cameron-defends-wellbeing-index.
  31. O’Brien, L. (2009). Wellbeing, forestry and ecosystem services: A discussion paper. Forest Research. Retrieved from http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/Forestry_and_wellbeing_discussion_paper.pdf/$FILE/Forestry_and_wellbeing_discussion_paper.pdf.
  32. Richardson, M., Hunt, A., Hinds, J., Bragg, R., Fido, D., Petronzi, D. …, & White, M. (2019). A measure of nature connectedness for children and adults: Validation, performance, and insights. Sustainability, 11(12), 3250.Google Scholar
  33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In R. M. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). Suffolk: The University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Warren Brown, K., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryff, C. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryff, C. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1103–1119.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2008). Measuring well-being in policy: Issues and applications. New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.Google Scholar
  41. Vanhoutte, B. (2014). The multidimensional structure of subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Population Ageing, 7(1), 1874–7876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, S. (2018). Moralities of wellbeing (Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing; No. 58/2018, pp. 1–17). Bath: Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, E. O. (2009). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In D. J. Penn & I. Mysterud (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems (pp. 249–258). New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherStroudUK
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations