Woodland Wellbeing

  • Alice GoodenoughEmail author
  • Sue Waite


This section discusses the growing evidence base for positive relationships between our exposure to trees, woods and forests and experiences of health and happiness. It describes theories suggesting such relationships are grounded within co-evolution of humans and nature, as well as drawing attention to the role our sociocultural connections with arboreal landscapes play. It signposts to literature from smaller studies from diverse disciplines to larger scale investigations driven by a policy need to substantiate health spending decisions. It highlights diversity and nuance within our responses towards trees, woods and forests and capacity to feel good in such settings, as well as identifying newer perspectives on and gaps in what we understand about our relationship with the outdoors and its impact on our health.


  1. Ambrose-Oji. B., & Fancett, K. (Eds.). (2011). Woods and forests in British Society: Progress in research and practice. In Conference Proceedings, Forest Research Monograph, 3. Farnham, Surrey: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, A., Duvall, J., & Kaplan, R. (2019). Attention restoration theory: Exploring the role of soft fascination and mental bandwidth. Environment and Behavior, 51(9–10), 1055–1081.Google Scholar
  3. BBC. (2011). Forest sale axed: Caroline Spelman says, ‘I’m sorry’. Retrieved from
  4. Beresford-Kroeger, D. (2010). The Global Forest: 40 ways trees can save us. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berto, R., Barbiero, G., Barbiero, P., & Senes, G. (2018). An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments. Some observations about Biophilia. Behavioral Sciences, 8, 34.Google Scholar
  7. Buijs, A. E., Elands, B. H. M., & Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, C., O’Brien, L., & Morris, J. (2011). Enabling positive change: Evaluation of the Neroche landscape partnership scheme. Farnham: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  9. Collado, S., Staats, H., & Sorrel, M. A. (2016). Helping out on the land: Effects of children’s role in agriculture on reported psychological restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coss, R. G., & Moore, M. (2002). Precocious knowledge of trees as antipredator refuge in preschool children: An examination of aesthetics, attributive judgments, and relic sexual dinichism. Ecological Psychology, 14(4), 181–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dadvand, P., Hariri, S., Abbasi, B., Heshmat, R., Qoorbani, M., Motlagh, M. E., … Kelishadi, R. (2019). Use of greenspaces, self-satisfaction and social contacts in adolescents: A population-based CASPIAN-V study. Environmental Research, 168, 171–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dinand Ekkel, E., & De Vries, S. (2017). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endreny, T. A. (2018). Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nature Communications. 9 Retrieved from
  15. Forestry Commission Scotland. (2009). Forest School: Evidence for restorative health benefits in young people. Retrieved from
  16. Forest Research. (2017). Public opinion of forestry 2017. Retrieved from
  17. Forest School Association. (n.d.). What is Forest School. Retrieved from
  18. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. Gagliano, M. (2013). Persons as plants: Ecopsychology and the return to the dream of nature. Landscapes: The Journal of the International Centre for Landscape and Language, 5(2). Retrieved from
  20. Gagliano, M. (2015). In a green frame of mind: Perspectives on the behavioural ecology and cognitive nature of plants. AoB Plants, 7, 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. Gagliano, M. (2017). The mind of plants: Thinking the unthinkable. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 10(2), 38427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagliano, M. (2019). Can plants think, talk and heal? Retrieved from
  23. Gagliano, M., & Grimonprez, M. (2015). Breaking the silence—Language and the making of meaning in plants. Ecopsychology, 7(3), 145–152. Scholar
  24. Gagliano, M., Mancuso, S., & Robert, D. (2012). Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 323–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Han, K. T. (2007). Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environmental Behavior, 39, 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, M. M., Jones, R., & Tocchini, K. (2017). Shinrin-yoku (forest bathing) and nature therapy: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 851.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansmann, R., Hug, S.-M., & Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartig, T., van den Berg, A. E., Hagerhall, C. M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., … Waaseth, G. (2011). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes (Chapter 5). In K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. de Vries, K. Seeland, & J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Forests, trees and human health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Haskell, D. G. (2017). The songs of trees: Stories from nature’s great connectors. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  31. Ideno, Y., Hayashi, K., Abe, Y., Ueda, K., Iso, H., Noda, M., … Suzuki, S. (2017). Blood pressure-lowering effect of Shinrin-yoku (forest bathing): A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17(1), 409.Google Scholar
  32. Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jose, S., Gillespie, A. R., & Pallardy, S. G. (2004). Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 237–255.Google Scholar
  34. Joye, Y., & Dewitte, S. (2018). Nature’s broken path to restoration. A critical look at attention restoration theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliation with nature. Development Review, 17, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, S. (1992). Perceptions and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. In J. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kauppi, P. E., Sandstrom, V., & Lipponen, A. (2018). Forest resources of nations in relation to human well-being. PLoS ONE, 13(5). Retrieved from Scholar
  40. Kellert, S., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–152). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kim, B. J., Jeong, H., Park, S., & Lee, S. (2015). Forest adjuvant anti-cancer therapy to enhance natural cytotoxicity in urban women with breast cancer: A preliminary prospective interventional study. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 7(5), 474–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, W., Lim, S., Chung, E., & Woo, J. (2009). The effect of cognitive behavior therapy-based psychotherapy applied in a forest environment on physiological changes and remission of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Investigations, 6, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. King, K. (2010). Lifestyle, identity and young people’s experiences of mountain biking. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
  45. Knez, I., Ode, Sang Å., Gunnarsson, B., & Hedblom, M. (2018). Wellbeing in urban greenery: The role of naturalness and place identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 491.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knopf, R. (1987). Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 783–825). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Kobayashi, H., Song, C., Ikei, H., Park, B. J., Lee, J., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2018). Forest walking affects autonomic nervous activity: A population-based study. Public Health, 6, 278.Google Scholar
  48. Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & Place, 14(4), 636–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuo, F. E. (2001). Coping with poverty impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Aggression and violence in the inner-city effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuo, F. E. (2003). The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. Journal of Arboriculture, 29(3), 148–155.Google Scholar
  53. Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leather, M. (2018). A critique of Forest School: Something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education., 21(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, J. Y., & Lee, D. C. (2014). Cardiac and pulmonary benefits of forest walking versus city walking in elderly women: A randomised, controlled, open-label trial. European Journal of Integrative Medicine., 6(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levang, P., Sitorus, S., & Dounias, E. (2007). City life in the midst of the forest: A Punan hunter-gatherer’s vision of conservation and development. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 18. Retrieved from
  57. Li, Q. (2009). Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 9–17.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li, Q., Morimoto, K., Kobayashi, M., Inagaki, H., Katsumata, M., Hirata, Y., … Krensky, A. M. (2008). Visiting a forest, but not a city, increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 21, 117–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (2006). Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior, 38, 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLOS ONE, 12(5). Retrieved from
  61. Mabey, R. (2007). Beechcombings: The narratives of trees. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  62. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (2001). Bodies in the woods. In P. Macnaghten & J. Urry (Eds.), Bodies of nature. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Martens, D., & Bauer, N. (2013). Natural environments—A resource for public health and wellbeing: A literature review. In E. Noethammer (Ed.), Psychology of wellbeing: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 173–217). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Marušáková, Ľ., & Sallmannshoferet, M. (2019). Human health and sustainable forest management. Bratislava: FOREST EUROPE. Retrieved from
  65. Menattia, L., Subiza-Pérez, M., Villalpando-Florese, A., Vozmedianoc, L., & San Juanc, C. (2019). Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Meyer, K., & Kotsch, K. (2017). Do forest and health professionals presume that forests offer health benefits, and is cross-sectional cooperation conceivable? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Milligan, C., & Bingley, A. (2004). ‘Climbing trees and building dens’: Mental health and well-being in young adults and the long-term effects of childhood play experience. Farnham: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  68. Mills, J. G., Brookes, J. D., Gellie, N. J. C., Liddicoat, C., Lowe, A. J., Sydnor, H. R., … Breed, M. F. (2019). Relating urban biodiversity to human health with the ‘holobiont’ concept. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 550.Google Scholar
  69. Morita, E., Fukuda, S., Nagano, J., Hamajima, N., Yamamoto, H., Iwai, Y., … Shirakawa, T. (2007). Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shirinyoku (forest air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health, 121(1), 54–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morton, T. A., van der Bles, A. M., & Alexander Haslam, S. (2017). Seeing our self reflected in the world around us: The role of identity in making (natural) environments restorative. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 65–77.Google Scholar
  71. Morris, J., & Urry, J. (2006). Growing places: A study of social change in The National Forest. Farnham: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  72. Morris, J., & O’Brien, L. (2011). Encouraging healthy activity amongst under-represented groups: An evaluation of the active England woodland projects. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O’Brien, L. (2004). A sort of magical place: People’s experiences of woodlands in northwest and southeast England. Farnham: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  74. O’Brien, L. (2005). Publics and woodlands: Well-being, local identity, social learning, conflict and management. Forestry, 78, 321–336. Scholar
  75. O’Brien, L., & Morris, J. (2014). Well-being for all? The social distribution of benefits gained from woodlands and forests in Britain. Local Environment, 19(4), 356–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. O’Brien, L., Townsend, M., & Ebden, M. (2008). ‘I like to think when I’m gone, I will have left this a better place’: Environmental volunteering: Motivations, barriers and benefits. Farnham: Forest Research.Google Scholar
  77. Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2016). Attention restoration theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 19(7), 305–343.Google Scholar
  78. Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2009). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15, 18–26.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15, 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Playlink. (2008). Forestry commission assessment of provision for play. Retrieved from
  81. Quay, J. (2017). From human–nature to cultureplace in education via an exploration of unity and relation in the work of Peirce and Dewey. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(4), 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rackham, O. (2010). Woodlands. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  83. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning, 38, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. SOFO. (2018). The state of the world’s forest. Retrieved from
  85. Song, C., Ikei, H., & Miyazaki, Y. (2017). Sustained effects of a forest therapy program on the blood pressure of office workers. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening., 27, 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Staats, H., & Hartig, T. (2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stafford, F. (2016). The long, long life of trees. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Stigsdotter, U. K., Sola Corazon, S., Sidenius, U., Kristiansen, J., & Grahn, P. (2017). It is not all bad for the grey city—A crossover study on physiological and psychological restoration in a forest and an urban environment. Health & Place, 46, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stephens, A., Taket, A., & Gagliano, M. (2019). Ecological justice for nature in critical systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tahvanainen, L., Tyrväinen, L., & Nousianinen, I. (1996). Effects of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tyrväinen, L., Pauleit, S., Seeland, K., & de Vries, S. (2005). Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. In K. Nilsson, T. B. Randrup, & C. C. Konijnendijk (Eds.), Urban forests and trees in Europe: A reference book (pp. 81–114). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Tyrväinen, L., Lanki, T., Sipilä, R., & Komulainen, J. (2018). What do we know about health benefits of forests. Duodecim, 134(13), 1397–1403. Retrieved from
  93. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia and natural landscapes’. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  94. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.Google Scholar
  95. United Nations. (2015). The sustainable development goals. Retrieved from
  96. von Lindern, E., Bauer, N., Frick, J., Hunziker, M., & Hartig, T. (2013). Occupational engagement as a constraint on restoration during leisure time in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waite, S. (2013). ‘Knowing your place in the world’: How place and culture support and obstruct educational aims. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Waite, S., & Davis, B. (2007). The contribution of free play and structured activities in Forest School to learning beyond cognition: An English case. In B. Ravn & N. Kryger (Eds.), Learning beyond cognition (pp. 257–274). Copenhagen: The Danish University of Education.Google Scholar
  99. Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears? A conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English Forest Schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892.Google Scholar
  100. Waite, S., & Goodenough, A. (2018). What is different about Forest School? Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Waite, S., Goodenough, A., Norris, V., & Puttick, N. (2016). From little acorns: Environmental action as a source of ecological wellbeing. Pastoral Care in Education: An International Journal of Personal, Social and Emotional Development, 34(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
  102. Weldon, S., Bailey, C., & O’Brien, E. (2007). New pathways to health and well-being in Scotland: Research to understand and overcome barriers to accessing woodlands. Report to Forestry Commission Scotland. Retrieved from…/New_Pathways_to_health_Nov2007.
  103. White, M., Yeo, N. L., Vassiljev, P., Lundstet, R., Wallegard, M., Albin, M., & Lohmus, M. (2018). A prescription for “nature”—The potential of using virtual nature for therapeutics. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 3001–3013.Google Scholar
  104. Wilkie, S., & Stavridou, A. (2013). Influence of environmental preference and environment type congruence on judgments of restoration potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Williams, K., & Harvey, D. (2001). Transcendent experience in forest environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wilson, O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Wilson, E. O. (2009). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In D. J. Penn & I. Mysterud (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems (pp. 249–258). New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  108. Wilson, R. (2019). Trees and the human spirit. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  109. Wohllenberg, P. (2016). The hidden life of trees: What they feel, how they communicate—Discoveries from a secret world. London: Greystone Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherStroudUK
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations