Advertisement

A Research and Strategy of Remote Sensing Image Denoising Algorithms

  • Ling LiEmail author
  • Junxing Hu
  • Fengge Wu
  • Junsuo Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1075)

Abstract

Most raw data download from satellites are useless, resulting in transmission waste, one solution is to process data directly on satellites, then only transmit the processed results to the ground. Image processing is the main data processing on satellites, in this paper, we focus on image denoising which is the basic image processing. There are many high-performance denoising approaches at present, however, most of them rely on advanced computing resources or rich images on the ground. Considering the limited computing resources of satellites and the characteristics of remote sensing images, we do some research on these high-performance ground image denoising approaches and compare them in simulation experiments to analyze whether they are suitable for satellites. According to the analysis results, we propose two feasible image denoising strategies for satellites based on satellite TianZhi-1.

Keywords

Image denoising Remote sensing images Satellite Simulation comparison Strategy 

References

  1. 1.
    Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.: A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 2, pp. 60–65 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, B.S.: Image denoising based on non-local means filter and its method noise thresholding. Signal Image Video Process. 7(6), 1211–1227 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Image denoising by sparse 3-D trans-form-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(8), 2080–2095 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knaus, C., Zwicker, M.: Progressive image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(7), 3114–3125 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knaus, C., Zwicker, M.: Dual-domain image denoising. In: 2013 20th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 440–444 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elad, M., Aharon, M.: Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(12), 3736–3745 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G., Li, X.: Nonlocally centralized sparse representation for image restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(4), 1620–1630 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wen, B., Ravishankar, S., Bresler, Y.: Structured overcomplete sparsifying transform learning with convergence guarantees and applications. Int. J. Comput. Vision 114(2–3), 137–167 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ravishankar, S., Bresler, Y.: MR image reconstruction from highly undersampled k-space data by dictionary learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(5), 1028 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain V, Seung S.: Natural image denoising with convolutional networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 769–776 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burger, H.C., Schuler, C.J., Harmeling S.: Image denoising: can plain neural networks compete with BM3D?. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2392-2399 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, U., Roth, S.: Shrinkage fields for effective image restoration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2774–2781 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, Y., Pock, T.: Trainable nonlinear reaction diffusion: a flexible framework for fast and effective image restoration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(6), 1256–1272 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mao, X., Shen, C., Yang, Y.B.: Image restoration using very deep convolutional en-coder-decoder networks with symmetric skip connections. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2802–2810 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., Zhang, L.: Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A., Lempitsky, V.: Deep image prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711-10925 (2017)
  18. 18.
    Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Zhang, L.: FFDNet: toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN based image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27, 4608–4622 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lehtinen, J., Munkberg, J., Hasselgren, J., Laine, S., Karras, T., Aittala, M., Aila, T.: Noise2Noise: learning image restoration without clean data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04189 (2018)
  20. 20.
    Maggiori, E., Tarabalka, Y., Charpiat, G., Alliez, P.: Can semantic labeling methods generalize to any city? The inria aerial image labeling benchmark. In: IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IGARSS) (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISCAS)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations