Advertisement

Extraction of Cyber-Physical Systems Inventions’ Structural Elements of Russian-Language Patents

  • Sergey S. Vasiliev
  • Dmitriy M. KorobkinEmail author
  • Alla G. Kravets
  • Sergey A. Fomenkov
  • Sergey G. Kolesnikov
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 259)

Abstract

The chapter presents software for extracting predicate-argument constructions that characterizing the composition of the structural elements of the inventions from cyber-physics domain and the relationships between them. The extracted structures reconstruct the component structure of the invention in the form of a net. Such data is further converted into a domain ontology and used in the field of information support of automated invention. A new method for extracting structured data from patents has been proposed taking into account the specificity of the text of patents and is based on the shallow parsing and segmentation of sentences. The ontology scheme includes the structural elements of technical objects as the concepts and the relationship between them, as well as supporting information on the invention. The results suggest that the proposed approach is promising. A further direction of research is seen by the authors in improving the existing method for extracting data and expanding ontology.

Keywords

Patents Information extraction SAO CAI-systems Ontology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research projects 18-07-01086, 19-07-01200; and was funded by RFBR and Administration of the Volgograd region according to the research projects 19-47-340007, 19-41-340016.

References

  1. 1.
    Choi, S., et al.: SAO network analysis of patents for technology trends identification: a case study of polymer electrolyte membrane technology in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Scientometrics, 863–883 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0420-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo, J., et al.: Subject–action–object-based morphology analysis for determining the direction of technological change. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (105), 27–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, X., et al.: Identification of technology development trends based on subject–action–object analysis: the case of dye-sensitized solar cells. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (98), 24–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, C., et al.: SAO semantic information identification for text mining. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 10, 593–604 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Souili, A., et al.: Starting from patents to find inputs to the problem graph model of IDM-TRIZ. Procedia Eng. 131, 150–161 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    UFAL UDPipe: http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe (2019)
  8. 8.
    Korobov, M.: Morphological Analyzer and Generator for Russian and Ukrainian Languages. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts, pp. 320–332. arXiv:1503.07283v1 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asiryan, A.K.: Morphological tagging tools comparison. Chapter presented at the Intellectual Potential of the XXI Century ’2017, November. https://www.sworld.com.ua/konferu7-317/27.pdf (2017)
  10. 10.
    Blazhievskaya, A., et al.: Morphological Analysis for Russian: Integration and Comparison of Taggers. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts, vol. 661, pp. 162–171. Springer, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dereza, O.V., et al.: Automatic morphological analysis for Russian: a comparative study. In: Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference «Dialogue» (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reis, S.R.N., Reis, A., Carrabina, J., Casanovas, P.: Contributions to Modeling Patent Claims When Representing Patent Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10791, pp. 140–156 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulmschneider, K., Glimm, B.: Semantic exploitation of implicit patent information. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI 2016), Athens, Greece, December (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2016.7849943
  14. 14.
    Korobkin, D., Fomenkov, S., Golovanchikov, A.: Method of identification of patent trends based on descriptions of technical functions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1015, 7 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korobkin, D., Fomenkov, S., Kolesnikov, S.: The method for detecting the dependencies between technical functions and physical effects. In: Proceedings of the MCCSIS 2018, Madrid, pp. 225–228 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phan, C.-P., Nguyen, H.-Q., Nguyen, T.-T.: Ontology-based heuristic patent search. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-06-2018-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey S. Vasiliev
    • 1
  • Dmitriy M. Korobkin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alla G. Kravets
    • 1
  • Sergey A. Fomenkov
    • 1
  • Sergey G. Kolesnikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Volgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations