Advertisement

Development of Models and Algorithms for Intellectual Support of Life Cycle of Chemical Production Equipment

  • Evgenii MoshevEmail author
  • Valeriy Meshalkin
  • Makar Romashkin
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 259)

Abstract

The article gives the statement of tasks necessary for automation of processes of adoption of intellectual decisions on the integrated logistic support of chemical production equipment, the solution of which is aimed at creating a cyber-physical system of the life cycle of the equipment. An example of formalization of this equipment life cycle with the help of functional modeling methods is given. There are given the models of knowledge representation about the equipment in a form of frames, and also—the processes of adoption of intellectual decisions on integrated logistic support of the equipment in a form of production rules. A heuristic-computational algorithm that allows automating the determination of classification characteristics of the equipment according to the degree of danger of the working substance is presented.

Keywords

Cyber-physical system Integrated logistic support Frame Production rules Heuristic-computational algorithm SADT-model Functional model 

References

  1. 1.
    Elena Nenni, M.: A cost model for integrated logistic support activities. Adv. Oper. Res. 2013, 1–6 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin, P., Kolesár, J.: Logistic support and computer aided acquisition. J. Logistics Manag. 1, 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meshalkin, V.P., Moshev, E.R.: Modes of functioning of the automated system “pipeline” with integrated logistical support of pipelines and vessels of industrial enterprises. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab. 44(7), 580–592 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moshev, E.R., Meshalkin, V.P.: Computer based logistics support system for the maintenance of chemical plant equipment. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 48(6), 855–863 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, D., Olson, D.L., Dolgui, A.: Artificial intelligence in engineering risk analytics. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 65, 433–435 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, F., Zou, F., Liu, J., Wang, Z.: Working mode in aircraft manufacturing based on digital coordination model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 98, 1547–1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2048-0 (2018) (Springer, Cham)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, H., Han, S.: Interactive 3D building modeling method using panoramic image sequences and digital map. Multimedia Tools Appl. 77(20), 27387–27404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5926-4 (2018) (Springer, Cham)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, J., Liu, Z., Yu, X., Feng, Q., Zeng, X.: Research on dynamic modeling and electromagnetic force centering of piston/piston rod system for labyrinth piston compressor. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 230(8), 786–798 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pretorius, P.J.: How integrated is integrated logistics. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 8(2), 11–16 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Comelli, M., Gourgand, M., Lemoine, D.: A review of tactical planning models. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 17(2), 204–229 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yevstratov, S.N., Vozhakov, A.V., Stolbov, V.Y.: Automation of production planning within an integrated information system of a multi-field enterprise. Autom. Remote Control 75(7), 1323–1329 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khouri, S., Bellatreche, L.: Design life-cycle-driven approach for data warehouse systems configurability. J. Data Semant. 6(2), 83–111. http://dx.doi.org/  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-017-0077-8 (2017) (Springer, Cham)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A., Isaksson, O.: A value-driven concept selection method for early system design. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 27(1), 46–77 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAP Software & Solutions. http://go.sap.com/index.html (2015). Accessed 14 Dec 2015
  16. 16.
    Isogen®. Automatic piping isometrics from 3D plant design systems. http://www.alias.ltd.uk/ISOGEN_main.asp (2015). Accessed 21 Jan 2015
  17. 17.
    AVEVA. Software Solutions for the Plant Industries. http://www.aveva.com/en/Products_and_Services/AVEVA_for_Plant.aspx (2015). Accessed 25 Jan 2015
  18. 18.
    CEA Systems. Plant-4D-Plant Engineering Solution. http://www.ceasystems.com/plant-4d-plant-engineering-solution (2014). Accessed 1 Jul 2014
  19. 19.
    iMaint.—CMMS Software—Service Management Software. http://www.imaint.com/en (2014). Accessed 5 Apr 2014
  20. 20.
    Lu, J., Zhu, Q., Wu, Q.: A novel data clustering algorithm using heuristic rules based on k-nearest neighbors’ chain. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 72, 213–227 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moshev, E.R., Romashkin, M.A.: Development of a conceptual model of a piston compressor for automating the information support of dynamic equipment. Chem. Petrol. Eng. 49(9–10), 679–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10556-014-9818-9 (2014). Springer, Cham
  22. 22.
    Menshikov, V., Meshalkin, V., Obraztsov, A.: Heuristic algorithms for 3D optimal chemical plant layout design. In: Proceedings of 19th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering (CHISA-2010), vol. 4, pp. 1425. Prague (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evgenii Moshev
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valeriy Meshalkin
    • 2
  • Makar Romashkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Perm National Research Polytechnic UniversityPermRussia
  2. 2.D. Mendeleev, University of Chemical Technology of RussiaMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations