Advertisement

Political Knowledge, Civic Education and Voting at 16

  • Henry MilnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics book series (PSYPP)

Abstract

To justify reducing eligibility to vote to age 16 is to show how it serves as a means to enhanced democratic political engagement. Hence the question posed here is under what, if any, circumstances does reducing the voting age enhance political engagement. Political engagement is shorthand for the second, qualitative dimension of electoral participation. The first dimension is that of turnout, a purely quantitative expression. If our concern is limited to this dimension, then we should address making voting compulsory. But, in doing so, we risk bringing to the polls an additional number of less sophisticated voters. This is also the challenge posed to voting at 16 which the data shows, can also raise turnout. This chapter concentrates on the second, qualitative, dimension of political participation, which we can characterize as political engagement, a combination of political interest and knowledge. And here the relationship is far from clear. The conclusion is thus that the first priority must be to promote natural experiments to test, and potentially establish, this relationship.

References

  1. Bergh, J. (2013). Does voting rights affect the political maturity of 16- and 17-year olds? Findings from the 2011 Norwegian voting-age trial? Electoral Studies, 32(1), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K., & Wass, H. (2012). The relationship between age and turnout: A roller-coaster ride. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 588–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, D., & Niemi, R. (2016). Testing civics: State-level civic education requirements and political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 495–511.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000368.
  4. Dassonneville, R., Quintelier, E., Hooghe, M., & Claes, E. (2012). The relation between civic education and political attitudes and behavior: A two-year panel study among Belgian late adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 16(3), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fesnic, F. (2016). Can civic education make a difference for democracy? Hungary and Poland compared. Educational Review, 64(4), 966–978.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, S., Laurence, L., & Curtice, J. (2008). Disengaging voters: Do plurality systems discourage the less knowledgeable from voting? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hooghe, M., & Stiers, D. (2017). Do reluctant voters vote less accurately? The effect of compulsory voting on party–voter congruence in Australia and Belgium. Australian Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Manning, N., & Edwards, K. (2014). Does civic education for young people increase political participation? A systematic review. Educational Review, 66(1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Milner, H. (2007). Political knowledge and participation among young Canadians and Americans (IRPP Working Paper).Google Scholar
  10. Milner, H. (2010). The Internet generation. Hanover, NH: UPNE.Google Scholar
  11. Neundorf, A., Niemi, R., & Smets, K. (2015). The compensation effect of civic education on political engagement: How civics classes make up for missing parental socialization. London: Royal Holloway, University of London.Google Scholar
  12. Owen, D., & Soule, S. (2015, September 3–6). Civic education, political knowledge, and dimensions of political engagement. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Pammett, J., & Leduc, L. (2003). Explaining the turnout decline in Canadian federal elections: A new survey of non-voters. Elections Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenqvist, O. (2016). Rising to the occasion? Youth political knowledge and the voting age (Working Paper). The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU) (2016/6).Google Scholar
  15. Schulz, W., Carstens, R., Losito, B., & Fraillon, J. (2016). ICCS technical report. Amsterdam: IEA, 2018.Google Scholar
  16. Torney-Purta, J., & Lopez, S. (2006). Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarden through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators. Denver: Education Commission of States.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Chair in Electoral StudiesUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations