Project BUMP: Developing Communication Tools for the Older Adult Population

  • Claudia B. RebolaEmail author
  • Shi He
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1069)


This paper describes the process of designing and developing robotic technologies as prosthetics for the home space to respond to the needs and advance the quality of life of older adults. The trend demographics report a significant increase of the number of older adults in the next decade in the United States, which would generate the most significant social transformations of the 21st century. Supporting older adult to age in place gracefully is a critical need. Even though there are a number of technologies that have been designed to support older adult, there are still challenges in their implementation and use, especially in products related to enabling communication. This project aims at exploring opportunities to expand the capabilities of existing homes and assist older adults in activities of daily life in their home. The project BUMP portrays a supportive human environment and how to extend older adults’ home in other’s homes. The significance of this project is to share pragmatic examples on how to better design technologies that are more natural, embedded and embodied communication tool for the older adult population.


Environment Robotics Older adults Well-being 


  1. 1.
    WHO | World report on ageing and health. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  2. 2.
    United Nations: World Population Ageing. (United Nations), 114 (2013).,+114.+. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  3. 3.
    F.I.F.A. Statistics: Older Americans 2016 Key Indicators of Well-Being. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kasem Cares: Socialization Leads to a Better Quality of Life for Seniors.
  5. 5.
    Cornwell, E.Y., Waite, L.J.: Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J. Health Soc. Behav. 50(1), 31–48 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute of Mental Health: Older Adults and Depression (2014).
  7. 7.
    K.H.-P. Care, Schlesinger, M., Golinkoff, R.M., Esther: The New Humanism: Technology should enhance, not replace, human interactions. Brookings, 11 June 2018Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Center for Technology and Aging: Technologies to Help Older Adults Maintain Independence: Advancing Technology Adoption (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones, B., Winegarden, C.R., Rogers, W.A.: Supporting Healthy Aging with New Technologies. Interactions 16 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rebola, C.B.: Designed Technologies for Healthy Aging. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu, C., Rebola, C.B., Kao, J.: BUMP: bridging unmet modes of participation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, New York, NY, USA, pp. 261–262 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Apache Kafka: Apache Kafka. Accessed 30 Mar 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations