Advertisement

3D Distance Transformations with Feature Subtraction

  • Mike Janzen
  • Sudhanshu Kumar SemwalEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1069)

Abstract

This paper presents a technique to implement three-dimensional distance transformation based on the city-block algorithm and selective removal of cells of interest using both serial and parallel techniques. We call this feature subtraction. One of the main benefits of feature subtraction is that the volume data could be representing as union of these subtracted features (e.g. spheres), replacing the cells in the volume data by a set of these disjointed spheres. The algorithm is implemented in the specialized graphics programming language called Processing Language.

Keywords

3D distance transformation Sphere packing Medical applications 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to acknowledge the role Slicer3D Community has played in our research directions. Although we have implemented the code using Processing Language, we want to implement the Distance Transformations algorithms using 3D Slicer platform in future. The second author of this paper is also grateful to Dr. Arcady Godin who introduced Dr. Leonid Perlovsky, and Dr. Perlovsky’s work on Dynamic Logic, although not discussed in paper, was the motivation to start our work in 3D medical data visualization.

References

  1. 1.
    Lorenson, W.E., Cline, H.E.: Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorithm. Comput. Graph. 21, 163–169 (1987). SIGGRAPH 1987 Proc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levoy, M.: Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 8, 29–37 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Upson, C., Keeler, M.: V-BUFFER: visible volume rendering. Comput. Graph. 22, 59–64 (1988). SIGGRAPH 1988 Proc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drebin, R., Carpenter, L., Hanrahan, P.: Volume rendering. Comput. Graph. 22, 65–74 (1988). SIGGRAPH 1988 Proc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spitzer, V.M., Whitlock, D.G.: High resolution electronic imaging of the human body. Biol. Photogr. 60, 167–172 (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan, D., Semwal, S.K.: A front to back technique for volume rendering. In: Computer Graphics International, Computer Graphics Around the World, Singapore, pp. 149–174. Springer-Verlag (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers, C.A.: Packing and Covering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1964)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgefors, G.: Distance transformation in digital images. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process 34, 344–371 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Junli, L, Xiuying, W.: A fast 3D euclidean distance transformation. In: 2013 6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP 2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bailey, D.G.: An Efficient Euclidean Distance TransformationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janzen, M.: 3D Distance Transformation with Feature Subtraction, MS Project report. Advisor: Dr. SK Semwal, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, pp. 1–49 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Semwal, S.K., Janzen, M., Promersberger, J., Perlovsky, L.: Towards approximate sphere packing solutions using distance transformations and dynamic logic. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S. (eds.) CVC 2019, AISC 944, pp. 1–14 (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17798-0-31

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ColoradoColorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations