Advertisement

When Inclusion Means Smart City: Urban Planning Against Poverty

  • Jean-Claude BolayEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1069)

Abstract

A majority of human beings live in cities, half of them in cities of less than 500.000 inhabitants, and around 1 billion of dwellers live today in slums (meaning 25% of urban residents in the global South). Having these numbers in mind, the main question for urban planners and decision makers is: why our forecasts of a sustainable urban development have not been reached, at least not for all people, what may we change in order to create and enhance “smart cities” offering access to infrastructures, services and environment of quality to all, without any exception? Based on a conceptual approach of urban planning and on case studies in Africa and Latin America, we shall focus on 3 dimensions of a renewed urban planning: base the planning on a diagnosis of human and material reality specific to each city – involve the planning in a critical perspective of financial and human available resources – implement innovative technologies in a participatory approach including inhabitants and all urban stakeholders.

Keywords

Urban Planning Smart cities Poverty 

References

  1. 1.
    Bolay, J.-C., Kern, A. L.: Intermediary cities. In: Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboten (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0163
  2. 2.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. United Nations, New York (2014). https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf
  3. 3.
    Bolay, J.-C., Chenal, J., Pedrazzini, Y.: Learning from the Slums: The Habitat of the Urban Poor in the Making of Emerging Cities. Springer, Paris (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31794-6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UN-Habitat: State of the World’s Cities 2010/2011. Bridging the Urban Divide. UN- Habitat & Earthscan, London: (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson, J.: Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. Routledge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parnell, S., Robinson, J.: (Re)theorising cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geograph. 33(4), 593–617 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watson, V.: Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central issues. Urban Stud. 46, 2259–2275 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yiftachel, O.: Ethnocracy. Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tannerfeldt, G., Ljung, P.: More Urban Less Poor. An Introduction to Urban Development and Management. Sida & Earthscan, London (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tacoli, C., McGranahan, G., Satterthwaite, D.: Urbanisation, rural-urban migration and urban poverty. IIED, London (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bolay, J.-C., Kern, A.L.: Technology and cities: what type of development is appropriate for cities of the south? J. Urban Technol. 18(3), 25–43 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.615563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolay, J.-C.: What sustainable development for the cities of the South? Urban issues for a third millennium. Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev. 4(1), 76–93 (2012). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19463138.2011.626170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M.: Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L., Colomer-Llinàs, J., Meléndez-Frigola, J.: Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change Part B 90, 611–622 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 135–148 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giffinger, R., Haindlmaier, G.: Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment = Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno, year IV, Num. 12, pp. 7–25 (2010). http://www-cpsv.upc.es/ace/Articles_n10/Articles_pdf/ACE_12_SA_10.pdf
  17. 17.
    Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., Airaksinen, M.: What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 60, 234–245 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monfaredzadeh, T., Berardi, U.: How can cities lead the way towards a sustainable, competitive and smart future? WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 191, 1063–1074 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.2495/SC140902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bolay, J.-C.: Planning the intermediate city, or how to do better with little: the case of the city of Nueve de Julio. Argentina. Curr. Urban Stud. 6(3), 366–400 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2018.63020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bolay, J.-C.: Prosperity and social inequalities: montes claros, how to plan an intermediary city in Brazil. Curr. Urban Stud. 4, 175–194 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.42013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bolay, J.-C.: Urban planning in Africa: which alternative for poor cities? the case of Koudougou in Burkina Faso. Curr. Urban Stud. 3, 413–431 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2015.34033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Key Facts. United Nations, New York (2018). https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf
  23. 23.
    UN-Habitat: Slum Almanac 2015–2016. Tracking Improvement in the Lives of Slum Dwellers. UN-Habitat, Nairobi (2016). https://unhabitat.org/slum-almanac-2015-2016/
  24. 24.
    World Bank. Global Monitoring Report: Rural-:Urban Dynamics and the Millennium Development Goals. World Bank, Washington, DC (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9806-7
  25. 25.
    Bolay, J.-C.: Slums and urban development: questions on society and globalisation. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 18(2), 284–298 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810600709492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hardoy, J.E., Mitlin, D., Satterthwaite, D.: Environmental Problems in an Urbanizing World. Finding Solutions for Cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Earthscan, London (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Satterthwaite, D.: The links between poverty and the environment in urban areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 590, 73–92 (2003). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3658546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cohen, M.: Urban economic challenges and the new urban agenda. UN-Habitat, Nairobi (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-Habitat): Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016. UN-Habitat, Nairobi (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lea, R..: Smart Cities: An Overview of the Technology Trends Driving Smart Cities. IEEE, Piscataway, USA (2017). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326099991_Smart_Cities_An_Overview_of_the_Technology_Trends_Driving_Smart_Cities

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Cooperation and Development (CODEV)Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations