Advertisement

Cultural Ranking of Countries Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Methodology

  • Jinling LiEmail author
  • Yuying Yang
  • Thomas L. Saaty
  • Haixiang Guo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1074)

Abstract

Different countries have different cultures, but it is difficult to say which culture is best directly. This paper mainly established a hierarchy for the ranking of cultures to prioritize and quantify thinking about and comparing different cultures. It does not only pay attention to the different features of cultures but also focuses on manifestations of cultures. There are 9 criteria and 27 subcriteria in our ranking of cultures. To find some leading cultures in the world, we rank the cultures of different counties by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). After we get the priorities of the subcriteria according to judgment matrix obtained by questionnaires, we create different intensity categories for each subcriterion. In the end, we obtain the top 5 countries: the United States, Denmark, Australia, Norway and Canada. The result may be significant for advocating the spread of the better cultures throughout the world. What do they have to offer that others need to emulate? That is what is considered in this paper.

Keywords

Cultural ranking AHP Culture globalization 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71573237, 71874165, New Century Excellent Talents in University of China under Grant No. NCET-13-1012, Research Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education of China No. 15YJA630019, China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring No. 0001212016CC60013, Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China No. 2016CFB503, and Open Foundation for Hubei Provincial Ecological Civilization Research Center in China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) under Grant No. STZK2018z09.

References

  1. 1.
    Glowacki, L.: Another View: Tribal violence, then and now. Washington Post, 25 April 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tylor, E.B.: Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Gordon Press, New York (1974). ISBN 978-0-87968-091-6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meaning of culture. Cambridge English Dictionary. Accessed 26 July 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T.: Terror management theory and research: empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In: Zanna, M.P. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 61–139. Academic Press, San Diego (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hofstede, G.: Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online readings in Psychology and Culture International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofstede, G.: National cultures in four dimensions: a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 13(1/2), 46–74 (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoppe, M.H.: Culture and leader effectiveness: the GLOBE study. Central Eur. J. Commun. (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiong, Z.D., Guo, R.F.: Evaluation of national cultural soft power and research on its promotion path. China Ind. Econ. 9, 18–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gannon, M.J., Pillai, R.: Understanding global cultures: metaphorical journeys through 34 nations, clusters of nations, continents & diversity, London (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu, M.Y.: Hofstede’s cultural dimensions 30 years later: a study of Taiwan and the United States. Intercult. Commun. Stud. XV(1), 33–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L.: Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM-Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas 102(2), 257 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, C.: Riding the waves of culture: understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey International (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, E.T., Hall, M.R.: Understanding Cultural Differences: [Germans, French and Americans]. Intercultural Press, Yarmouth (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R.: Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shane, S.A.: Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. J. Bus. Venturing 8, 59–73 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vliert, V.E.: Climate, Affluence, and Culture. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinling Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yuying Yang
    • 1
  • Thomas L. Saaty
    • 3
  • Haixiang Guo
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementChina University of GeosciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Wuhan University of Engineering ScienceWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Strategic Studies, Ministry of Land and ResourcesChina University of GeosciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research CenterChina University of GeosciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations