Advertisement

Basic Income, Disability Dimension and the Fairness Test

  • Jennifer MaysEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee book series (BIG)

Abstract

This chapter critically explores the philosophical arguments of Rawls’s theory of justice and fairness to develop a normative justification for basic income, and egalitarian distributive justice and considerations of the disability dimension. In this chapter, the question is posed, can a non-marginalizing basic income be achieved for people with disability? In response, Rawls’s theory of justice is extended to include insights from Fraser’s disability and distributive justice conceptions. The conceptions help extend basic income ideas to position the disability dimensions within basic income debates, design considerations and implementation strategies. Such an exploration helps to inform strategies for basic income that are inclusive of the disability dimension to produce enhanced equitable effects.

References

  1. Ablett, P., Morley, C., & Newcomb, M. (2019). Social work, human services and basic income. In E. Klein, J. Mays, & T. Dunlop (Eds.), Implementing a basic income in Australia: Pathways forward (pp. 215–235). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundson, R. (1992). Disability, handicap, and the environment. Journal of Social Philosophy, 23(1), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. S. (1999). What’s the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badano, G. (2014). Political liberalism and the justice claims of the disabled: A reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(4), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickenbach, J. E. (2014). Universally design social policy: When disability disappears? Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(16), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickenbach, J. E., & Cieza, A. (2011). The prospects for universal disability law and social policy. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  7. Birnbaum, S. (2012). Basic income reconsidered: Social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birnbaum, S. (2017). Equality of opportunity and the precarization of labour markets. European Journal of Political Theory, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885117738116
  9. Brand, M. (2019, June 7). Rebrand universal basic income? Why its biggest advocates say its time. Inverse. Retrieved from, http://inverse.com. Accessed 7 June 2019.
  10. Brighouse, H. (2001). Can justice as fairness accommodate the disabled? Social Theory & Practice, 27(4), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brighouse, H., & Wright, E. O. (2008). Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics & Society, 36(3), 360–372.Google Scholar
  12. Casal, P. (2007). Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117(2), 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Commission of Inquiry into Poverty in Australia. (1975). Poverty in Australia: First main report. Canberra, ACT: AGPS.Google Scholar
  14. Cunliffe, J., & Erreygers, G. (2005). The origins of universal grants: An anthology of historical writings on basic capital and basic income. Houndsmills, BA: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Danermark, B., & Gellerstedt, L. C. (2004). Social justice: Redistribution and recognition—A non-reductionist perspective on disability. Disability & Society, 19(4), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition: Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Law Review, 212, 68–93.Google Scholar
  17. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fraser, N. (2001). Recognition without ethics. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(2), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (2007). Identity, exclusion, and critique: A response to four critics. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 305–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gramsci, A. (1977). The conquest of the state (J. Mathews, Trans.). In Q. Hoare (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci: Selections from political writings 1910–1920 (pp. 73–78). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Gramsci, A. (1996). Selections. In Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith (Eds.), Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  22. Grover, C., & Piggott, L. (2007). Social security, employment and incapacity benefit: Critical reflections on A new deal for welfare. Disability & Society, 22(7), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirschmann, N. J. (2013). Rawls, freedom, and disability: A feminist reading. In R. Abbey (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of John Rawls. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschmann, N. J. (2016). Disability rights, social rights, and freedom. Journal of International Political Theory, 12(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimberlin, S. E. (2009). Political science theory and disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(1), 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marshall, T. H. (2000). Citizenship and social class. In C. Pierson & F. G. Castles (Eds.), The welfare state: A reader (pp. 32–41). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and social class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mays, J. M. (2015). Countering disablism: An alternative universal income support system based on egalitarianism. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18(2), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mays, J. (2016). Disability, citizenship, and basic income: Forging a new alliance for a non-disabling society. In J. Mays, G. Marston, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: Perspectives from the neoliberal frontier (pp. 207–251). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Mays, J., Marston, G., & Tomlinson, J. (2016). Neoliberal frontiers and economic insecurity: Is basic income a solution? In J. Mays, G. Marston, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: Perspectives from the neoliberal frontier (pp. 1–25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Mladenov, T. (2016). Disability and social justice. Disability & Society, 31(9), 1226–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagel, T. (1997). Justice and nature. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17(2), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: The Bellknap Press.Google Scholar
  35. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pogge, T. (1989). Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pogge, T. (2004). Equal liberty for all? Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 28(1), 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of Freedom (J. Wark, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. In E. Kelly (Ed.), Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Richardson, H. S. (2006). Rawlsian social-contract theory and the severely disabled. The Journal of Ethics, 10(4), 419–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sisson, M., & DeNicolo, M. (2015). Minimal mutual advantage: How can the social contract do justice to the disabled. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(2), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat Charter: From denizens to citizens. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  45. Stark, C. A. (2007). How to include the severely disabled in a contractarian theory of justice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Titmuss, R. M. (1974). The social division of welfare. London: University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Torry, M. (2016). The feasibility of citizen’s income. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tulloch, P. (1979). Poor policies: Australian income security 1972–1977. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  49. Unemployed Workers Movement. (Western Australia). (1979). The guaranteed minimum income, pamphlet July 28–29. Perth, WA: Unemployed Workers Movement.Google Scholar
  50. Van Parijs, P. (1991). Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20(2), 101–131.Google Scholar
  51. Van Parijs, P. (1997). Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Parijs, P. (2000). Basic income and the two dilemmas of the welfare state. In C. Pierson & F. G. Castles (Eds.), The welfare state: A reader (pp. 355–359). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  53. Van Parijs, P. (2001). What’s wrong with a free lunch? Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  54. Van Parijs, P. (2002). Egalitarian justice left libertarianism and the market. In I. Carter, S. de Wijze, & M. Kramer (Eds.), The anatomy of justice: Themes from the political philosophy of Hillel Steiner (pp. 145–162). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Van Parijs, P. (2005). Basic income: A simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. In B. Ackerman, A. Alstott, & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), Redesigning distribution: Basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Van Parijs, P. (2007). International distributive justice. In R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, & T. Pogge (Eds.), The Blackwell’s companion to political philosophy Vol. II (pp. 638–652). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Wasserman, D., Asch, A., Blustein, J., & Putnam, D. (2015, Summer). Disability and justice. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/disability-justice/
  58. Widerquist, K. (2013). Independence, propertylessness and basic income. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Widerquist, K., Vanderborght, Y., Noguera, J., & De Wispeleare, J. (2013). Introduction. In K. Widerquist, J. A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, & J. De Wispeleare (Eds.), Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research (pp. xi–xxiv). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kelvin Grove CampusQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations