Conclusion: A New Trinity of Governance?
The book highlights how wellbeing, resilience and sustainability come together in both policy making and public consciousness to promote a particular form of governance. While noting some of the confusion, ambiguity and contradiction present in how policy-makers take up these concepts, our main point has been to point out their connectedness, particularly as they have emerged ‘after the crisis’ as neoliberalism tries to recalibrate. We strongly associate these ideas with forms of governance that see themselves as responding to crisis and as advocating the need for rethinking and renewal. These ideas are thus connected to the dynamic wider social, political and economic context and the changing global political environment. There is often a conscious embrace of paradox, in particular through an obsession with better governing while also raising doubt and uncertainty about our ability to intervene. The new trinity provides a means whereby these doubts are being worked into the mechanisms of governance, while not interrupting the process of getting on with actual governing. This is the central paradox of the new trinity: that the three ideas have a certain critical element inherent in them that questions the rationalism, calculation and science on which government intervention has been founded, while at the same time exploring new ways that rationalism, calculation, science can be deployed to reinforce the governance systems that they raise their concerns about. We argue that the radical implications of the trinity are being compromised by this relationship to existing mechanisms of governance and call for a more systemic and genuinely transformative approach to the central issues of our time.
KeywordsWellbeing Resilience Sustainability Governance Social transformation Systems
- Bevir, M. (Ed.). (2016). Governmentality after Neoliberalism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human Security Now. New York: CHS.Google Scholar
- Cornia, G. A., Jolly, R., & Stewart, F. (1987). Adjustment with Human Face. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, W. (2017). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- DFID. (2011). Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M., & Ney, S. (1998). Missing Persons: A Critique of the Social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2012). EU Approach to Resilience: Learning from Food Security Crises. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2014). Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Haldrup, S. V., & Rosn, F. (2013). Developing Resilience: A Retreat from Grand Planning, Resilience. International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 1(2), 130–145.Google Scholar
- High Representative (HR/VP). (2016, June). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Available Online at http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf. Last accessed 14 April 2019.
- Landell-Mills, P., & Serageldin, I. (1991). Governance and the External Factor. Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics (pp. 303–320). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- McGregor, J. A. (2018). Reconciling Universal Frameworks and Local Realities in Understanding and Measuring Wellbeing (Chapter 9). In I. Bache & K. Scott (Eds.), The Politics of Wellbeing: Theory, Policy and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Sandel, M. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of the Market. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Stiglitz Commission. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report. Accessed 17 December 2018.
- UN. (2000). Millennium Declaration. A/RES/55/2. New York: United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
- UN. (2005). World Summit Outcome: Responsibility to Protect. A/RES/60/1. New York: United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
- UN. (2015). The Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar