Advertisement

Robot-Assisted Vasectomy Reversal (Vasovasostomy)

  • George A. de BoccardEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Since the early days of the twentieth century, vasectomy gained attention with its eugenic and therapeutic applications. Soon it was adopted for purely contraceptive purpose in many European countries. Today, vasectomy is widely used as a contraceptive tool, and it is estimated that about 50 million men have relied on vasectomy for family planning. Above all, in the United States, vasectomy is chosen as contraceptive method by nearly 11% of married couples. With the success of vasectomy, the number of patient seeking for a repair grows parallel.

Keywords

Robot-assisted vasectomy reversal Vasovasostomy Vasectomy reversal 

References

  1. 1.
    Ligod G. Vasectomia, amor sin consecuensas, 1933, cited in ecologia humana en el anarquismo iberico. Masjuan-Bracons E, editor. Madrid: Icaria; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandlow JI, Nagler HM. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: important issues. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(3):xiii–xiv.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jequier AM. Edward Martin (1859–1938). The founding father of modern clinical andrology. Int J Androl. 1991;14(1):1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Potts JM, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson D, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1999;161:1835–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Twyman ED, Nelson CS. Vas deferens anastomosis: successful repair four years subsequent to bilateral vasectomy. Urol Cutan Rev. 1938;42:586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, et al. Results of 1469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. 1991;145:505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yarbro ES, Howards SS. Vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1987;14(3):515–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas AJ Jr, Pontes JE, Buddhdev H, Pierce JM Jr. Vasovasostomy: evaluation of four surgical techniques. Fertil Steril. 1979;32(3):324–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer MA, Grantmyre JE. Comparison of modified one- and two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. BJU Int. 2000;85(9):1085–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleming C. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31:769–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, et al. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol. 2004;171(1):300–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuang W, Shin PR, Oder M, et al. Robotic assisted vasovasostomy: a two-layer technique in an animal model. J Urol. 2005;65(4):811–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol. 2004;171:1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Boccard G-A. Robotic vasectomy reversal, video, posted YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zHRyFHC7nE. Accessed 25 Oct 2009.
  15. 15.
    Parekattil SJ, Atalah HN, Cohen MS. Video technique for human robot-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(4):511–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parekattil SJ, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt J, Wharton J, Priola KB. Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28:435–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kavoussi PK. Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:245–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Boccard G-A, Mottrie A. Robotic surgery in male infertility. In: Robotics in genitourinary surgery, vol. 7. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 617–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Boccard G. RAMSES – the robotic assisted microsurgical & endoscopic society 2015 meeting report. Robotics Lap Endosurg. 2016;2(1):46–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shurey S, Akelina Y, Legagneux J, Malzone G, Jiga L, Ghanem AM. The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(3):201–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prunières GJ, Taleb C, Hendriks S, Miyamoto H, Kuroshima N, Liverneaux PA, Facca S. Use of the Konnyaku shirataki noodle as a low fidelity simulation training model for microvascular surgery in the operating theatre. Chir Main. 2014;33(2):106–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Mulken TJM, et al. Robotic (super) microsurgery: feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118(5):826–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Innocenti M. A new robotic platform devoted to microsurgery: preliminary report. World Society for reconstructive microsurgery congress, Seoul, Korea, 17 June 2017.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chan P, Parekattil SJ, Goldstein M, Lipschultz LI, Kavoussi P, McCullough A, Sigman M. Pros and cons of robotic microsurgery as an appropriate approach to male reproductive surgery for vasectomy reversal and varicocele repair. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):816–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy Surgery CenterClinique Generale BeaulieuGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations