Advertisement

Learning from Suspected Target: Bootstrapping Performance for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography

  • Li XiaoEmail author
  • Cheng Zhu
  • Junjun Liu
  • Chunlong Luo
  • Peifang Liu
  • Yi Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11769)

Abstract

Deep learning object detection algorithm has been widely used in medical image analysis. Currently all the object detection tasks are based on the data annotated with object classes and their bounding boxes. On the other hand, medical images such as mammography usually contain normal regions or objects that are similar to the lesion region, and may be misclassified in the testing stage if they are not taken care of. In this paper, we address such problem by introducing a novel top likelihood loss together with a new sampling procedure to select and train the suspected target regions, as well as proposing a similarity loss to further identify suspected targets from targets. Mean average precision (mAP) according to the predicted targets and specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, AUC values according to classification of patients are adopted for performance comparisons. We firstly test our proposed method on a private dense mammogram dataset. Results show that our proposed method greatly reduce the false positive rate and the specificity is increased by 0.25 on detecting mass type cancer. It is worth mention that dense breast typically has a higher risk for developing breast cancers and also are harder for cancer detection in diagnosis, and our method outperforms a reported result from performance of radiologists. Our method is also validated on the public Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) dataset, brings significant improvement on mass type cancer detection and outperforms the most state-of-the-art work.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program (2017-074) to Li Xiao.

Supplementary material

490281_1_En_52_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1077 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Al-masni, M.A., et al.: Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in digital mammograms via regional convolutional neural network. In: 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1230–1233. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., Bradley, A.P.: A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention. Med. Image Anal. 37, 114–128 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 88(2), 303–338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giger, M.L., et al.: Automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of women with dense breasts: reader study of mammography-negative and mammography-positive cancers. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 206(6), 1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hadsell, R., Chopra, S., LeCun, Y.: Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005 (CVPR), vol. 01, pp. 539–546, June 2005.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.202
  6. 6.
    Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeyer, P.: The digital database for screening mammography (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kooi, T., et al.: Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med. Image Anal. 35, 303–312 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, T.Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8693, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reiazi, R., Paydar, R., Ardakani, A.A., Etedadialiabadi, M.: Mammography lesion detection using faster R-CNN detector, pp. 111–115, January 2018.  https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2018.80212
  10. 10.
    Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 91–99 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li Xiao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cheng Zhu
    • 1
  • Junjun Liu
    • 2
  • Chunlong Luo
    • 1
  • Peifang Liu
    • 2
  • Yi Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Advanced Computer Research CenterInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and HospitalTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations