Endoleak Type I

  • Stevo Duvnjak


Endoleak type I is a high-pressure endoleak, and the risk of aneurysm rupture remains high. Treatment of endoleak type I can be challenging and can require a different endovascular strategy; in some cases, open surgery is the best treatment option. In this chapter, treatment of endoleak type I is described through use of various examples. Endovascular endoleak procedures using different materials such as micro-coils, liquid embolic material and aortic cuffs have been used. Newer technologies such as the EndoAnchor and advanced stent graft technology has been used as well. The best advice is to properly plan and select patients for endovascular treatment and avoid endoleak type I.


Endoleak type I Aortic cuff Fenestrated aortic cuff Micro-coils Liquid embolic material 

Suggested Reading

  1. 1.
    Ameli-Renani S, Pavlidis V, Morgan RA. Early and midterm outcomes after transcatheter embolization of type I endoleaks in 25 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:346–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biasi L, Ali T, Hinchliffe R, Morgan R, Loftus I, Thompson M. Intraoperative DynaCT detection and immediate correction of a type Ia endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandri MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charbonneau P, Hongku K, Herman CR, et al. Long-term survival after endovascular and open repair in patients with anatomy outside instructions for use criteria for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:1823–30. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chun JY, Morgan R. Transcatheter embolisation of type 1 endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with Onyx: when no other treatment option is feasible. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45:141–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donas KP, Inchingolo M, Cao P, pELVIS Registry Collaborators, et al. Secondary procedures following iliac branch device treatment of aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation: the pELVIS registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duvnjak S. Endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms: from intentional occlusion of the internal iliac artery to branch iliac stent graft. World J Radiol. 2016;8:275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duvnjak S, Balezantis T. Endovascular treatment of aorta–iliac aneurysms with a flared iliac limb. Int J Angiol. 2019;28:57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elkouri S, Martelli E, Gloviczki P, et al. Most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm are not suitable for endovascular repair using currently approved bifurcated stent-grafts. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;38:401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG, EVAR Trial Participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jordan WD Jr, Mehta M, Varnagy D, et al. Results of the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry of EndoAnchors for type Ia endoleaks and endograft migration in patients with challenging anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:885–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kouvelos GN, Spanos K, Nana P, et al. Large diameter (≥29 mm) proximal aortic necks are associated with increased complication rates after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;60:70–5. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouvelos GN, Oikonomou K, Antoniou GA, Verhoeven EL, Katsargyris A. A systematic review of proximal neck dilatation after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302:1535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maldonado TS, Rosen RJ, Rockman CB, et al. Initial successful management of type I endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:664–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mascoli C, Faggioli G, Gallitto E, et al. Planning and endograft related variables predisposing to late distal type I endoleaks. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(3):334–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Donnell TFX, Deery SE, Boitano LT, et al. Aneurysm sac failure to regress after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower long-term survival. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:414–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perini P, Bianchini Massoni C, Mariani E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of different treatments for type 1a endoleak after EVAR. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;60:435–446.e1. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spanos K, Rohlffs F, Panuccio G, Eleshra A, Tsilimparis N, Kölbel T. Outcomes of endovascular treatment of endoleak type Ia after EVAR: a systematic review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;60:175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tadros RO, Sher A, Kang M, et al. Outcomes of using endovascular aneurysm repair with active fixation in complex aneurysm morphology. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:683–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stevo Duvnjak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyOdense University HospitalOdense Denmark

Personalised recommendations