Advertisement

Introduction: The Need for a Dynamic Theory on Social Entrepreneurship

  • Arvind AshtaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Ashta argues that a combination of high-speed technological change and inequalities is leading to an increase in social entrepreneurship, which in turn drives research in social entrepreneurship. However, research in this disciplinary field of social entrepreneurship is young, definitional, largely case-based and static. To make social entrepreneurship research more dynamic, Ashta proposes using the life cycle concept. He demonstrates that the overlap between research on microfinance sector and social entrepreneurship theory is surprisingly small, indicating that researchers have been treating these as distinct fields although there should be considerable overlaps. This book takes elements of the research in social entrepreneurship discipline, microfinance industry and the life cycle concept to extend Ashta’s previous work on building a realistic theory of social entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Social entrepreneur Social enterprise For-profit Not-for-profit Microfinance Life cycle 

References

  1. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Violante, G. L. (2002). General Purpose Technology and Wage Inequality. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arikan, A. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2016). Corporate Acquisitions, Diversification, and the Firm’s Life Cycle. Journal of Finance, 71(1), 139–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, D. B., Sandvik, I. L., & Sandvik, K. (2018). Two Paths to Organizational Effectiveness—Product Advantage and Life-Cycle Flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 84, 285–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashta, A. (2016). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Selling Dreams to Society. Burgundy School of Business. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2861345.
  5. Ashta, A. (2018). Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Selling Dreams as Visions and Missions. Cost Management, 32(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  6. Ashta, A. (2019). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship (NGOs) Grounded on Microfinance Research: Selling Dreams to Society. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 28(4), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Woolf, A. G. (1986). The Industry Life Cycle and the Concentration Profits Relationship. American Economist, 30 (2), 46–51.Google Scholar
  8. Bátiz-Lazo, B., & Billings, M. (2012). New Perspectives on Not-For-Profit Financial Institutions: Organisational Form, Performance and Governance. Business History, 54(3), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In Search of the Hybrid Ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1986). Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families. Journal of Labor Economics 4 (3), S1–39.Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, C. V. (2016). The Ongoing Evolution in Social Enterprise Legal Forms. In D. R. Young, E. A. Searing, & C. V. Brewer (Eds.), The Social Enterprise Zoo: A Guide for Perplexed Scholars, Entrepreneurs, Philanthropists, Leaders, Investors, and Policymakers (pp. 33–64). Glos, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calderisi, R. (2006). The Trouble with Africa: Why Foreign Aid Isn’t Working. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, R. (1986). Putting the Last First. In P. Ekins (Ed.), The Living Economy: A New Economics in the Making (pp. 306–322). London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Costanzo, L. A., Vurro, C., Foster, D., Servato, F., & Perrini, F. (2014). Dual-Mission Management in Social Entrepreneurship: Qualitative Evidence from Social Firms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 655–677.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Soto, H. (2000). The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. London, UK: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  17. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (Eds.). (2018). Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Dibrell, C., Craig, J., & Hansen, E. (2011). Natural Environment, Market Orientation, and Firm Innovativeness: An Organizational Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 467–489.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. London, UK: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emerson, J. (2003). The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erixon, F. (2003). Poverty and Recovery: The History of Aid and Development in East Africa. Economic Affairs, 23(4), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (2003 [1961]). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reasons (Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Fraisse, L., Gardin, L., Laville, J.-L., Petrella, F., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2016). Social Enterprise in France: At the Crossroads of the Social Economy, Solidarity Economy and Social Entrepreneurship? (CSEM Working Papers 34). Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.Google Scholar
  25. Fujimoto, T. (2014). The Long Tail of the Auto Industry Life Cycle. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 8–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hasan, M. M., & Cheung, A. (2018). Organization Capital and Firm Life Cycle. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 556–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the Way in Which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingham, M., & Assadi, D. (2016). A Research Agenda: Crowdfunding at the Service of Responsible Social Entrepreneurship and Innovations. Cahiers du CEREN vol 49. Burgundy School of Business, Dijon, France.Google Scholar
  29. Kerlin, J. A., Monroe-White, T., & Zook, S. (2016). Habitats in the Zoo. In D. R. Young, E. A. Searing, & C. V. Brewer (Eds.), The Social Enterprise Zoo (pp. 67–92). Glos, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leontief, W. (1986). Input-Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Manzardo, A., Loss, A., Jingzheng, R., Zuliani, F., & Scipioni, A. (2018). Definition and Application of Activity Portfolio and Control/Influence Approaches in Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohan, G. (2002). Participatory Development. In V. Desai & R. Potter (Eds.), The Companion to Development Studies (pp. 49–53). London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
  33. Moutos, T. (2006). Technological Change, Inequality and Work Sharing. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(3), 305–318.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00381.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moyo, D. (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  35. Mueller, D. C. (1972). A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm. Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(3), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We Do Good Things, Don’t We?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in Social Entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nurkse, R. (1952). Some International Aspects of the Problem of Economic Development. American Economic Review, 42(2), 571.Google Scholar
  38. Pache, A.-C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social Entrepreneurs as Institutionally Embedded Entrepreneurs: Toward a New Model of Social Entrepreneurship Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2018). Economic Inequality and Social Entrepreneurship. Business and Society, 57(6), 1150–1190.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317696069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perren, L. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship: Mythological ‘Doublethink’. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 127–133). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinto, J. E., Henry, E., Robinson, T. R., & Stowe, J. D. (2015). Equity Asset Valuation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: The Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders Matter: How Social Enterprises Address Mission Drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ranis, G. (1977). Development and the Distribution of Income: Some Counterevidence. Challenge, 20 (4), 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work: Technology, Jobs, and Your Future. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
  47. Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making Hybrids Work: Aligning Business Models and Organizational Design for Social Enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.  https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider, A. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, Collectivism, and Everything in Between: Prototypes and Continuous Dimensions. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 421–431.  https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  50. Serres, C., & Hudon, M. (2019). Toward the Emergence of a For-Profit Social Enterprise Paradigm: The Case of Social Companies. Paper presented at the Sixth European Microfinance Research Conference, Paris, June 3–5,Google Scholar
  51. Smith, N. R., & Miner, J. B. (1983). Type of Entrepreneur, Type of Firm, and Managerial Motivation: Implications for Organizational Life Cycle Theory. Strategic Management Journal, 4(4), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spencer, D. (2017). Work in and Beyond the Second Machine Age: The Politics of Production and Digital Technologies. Work, Employment & Society, 31(1), 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stewart, F. (1978). Inequality, Technology and Payments Systems. World Development, 6(3), 275–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(78)90108-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teasdale, S., Lyon, F., & Owen, R. (2018). A Methodological Critique of the Social Enterprise Growth Myth. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 19–39). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vona, F., & Patriarca, F. (2011). Income Inequality and the Development of Environmental Technologies. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2201–2213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. (1991). Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, M., & Thompson, S. (1986). Vertical Disintegration and the Life-Cycle of Firms and Industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 7(2), 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An Identity-Based Approach to Social Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, D. R., & Longhofer, W. (2016). Designing the Zoo. In D. R. Young, E. A. Searing, & C. V. Brewer (Eds.), The Social Enterprise Zoo: A Guide for Perplexed Scholars, Entrepreneurs, Philanthropists, Leaders, Investors, and Policymakers (pp. 15–32). Glos, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2007). Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  63. Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism That Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  64. Yunxia, Z. H. U., Rooney, D., & Phillips, N. (2016). Practice-Based Wisdom Theory for Integrating Institutional Logics: A New Model for Social Entrepreneurship Learning and Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(3), 607–625.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zietsma, C., & Tuck, R. (2012). First, Do No Harm: Evaluating Resources for Teaching Social Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 512–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERENBurgundy School of BusinessDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations