Advertisement

Representative Bureaucracy and Performance

  • Sergio Fernandez
Chapter
Part of the Executive Politics and Governance book series (EXPOLGOV)

Abstract

The chapter introduces the book’s central themes: representative bureaucracy, the demographic transformation of the South African public service since 1994, and how racial and gender representation influence bureaucratic performance. Affirmative action to promote equity and proportional representation in the public sector is discussed, along with a summary of the main criticisms of affirmative action, including claims about its adverse impact on bureaucratic capacity and performance. Another view is also presented, one based on research suggesting representative bureaucracies are more effective at implementing public policies. The main research questions are then posed: can increased representation of blacks and women in the public service improve organizational performance, and if so, how or why? The methodological approach, data, and main empirical findings are summarized.

Keywords

Representative bureaucracy Transformation Affirmative action Performance 

References

  1. Agocs, C., & Burr, C. (1996). Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity: Assessing the differences. International Journal of Manpower, 17, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA). (1995). White paper on the transformation of the public service. Pretoria: DPSA.Google Scholar
  5. DPSA. (1998). White paper on affirmative action in the public service. Pretoria: DPSA.Google Scholar
  6. DPSA. (2016). Annual report on employment equity in the public service 2015/2016. Pretoria: DPSA.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandez, S., Malatesta, M., & Smith, C. R. (2013). Race, gender, and government contracting: Different explanations or new prospects for theory? Public Administration Review, 73, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks, P. E. (2014). The crisis of the South African public service. Journal of the Helen Suzman Foundation, 74, 48–56.Google Scholar
  9. Gade, D. M., & Wilkins, V. M. (2013). Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guan, L. H. (2005). Affirmative action in Malaysia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habib, A. (2013). South Africa’s suspended revolution: Hopes and prospects. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay (pp. 1–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heilman, M. E., Battle, W. S., Keller, C. E., & Lee, R. A. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (1999). Are affirmative action hires less qualified? Evidence from employer-employee data on new hires. Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 534–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (2000). What does affirmative action do? ILR Review, 53, 240–271.Google Scholar
  17. Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (2006). Affirmative action: What do we know? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaffrelot, C. (2006). The impact of affirmative action in India: More political than socioeconomic. India Review, 5, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaunch, H. M. (1998). Affirmative action in Namibia: Redressing the imbalances of the past? Windhoek: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
  20. Jeffery, A. (2014). BEE: Helping or hurting? Cape Town: Tafelberg.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, R. W. (2010). South Africa’s brave new world: The beloved country since the end of apartheid. New York: Overlook Press.Google Scholar
  22. Keiser, L. R. (2010). Representative bureaucracy. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (pp. 1–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellough, J. E. (2006). Understanding affirmative action: Politics, discrimination and the search for justice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kernaghan, K. (1978). Representative bureaucracy: The Canadian perspective. Canadian Public Administration, 21, 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.Google Scholar
  27. Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Kubler, D., Kobelt, E., & Andrey, S. (2012). Towards a representative bureaucracy: Promoting linguistic representation and diversity in the Swiss and Canadian federal public services. World Political Science Review, 8, 272–296.Google Scholar
  29. Lim, H. (2006). Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review, 66, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long, N. E. (1952). Bureaucracy and constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 46, 808–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luiz, J. M. (2002). South African state capacity and post-apartheid economic reconstruction. International Journal of Social Economics, 29, 594–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 3, 243–277.Google Scholar
  33. Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69, 526–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 393–414.Google Scholar
  35. Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  36. Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66, 850–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meier, J., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. Journal of Politics, 61, 1025–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ncholo, P. (2000). Reforming the public service in South Africa: A policy framework. Public Administration and Development, 20, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ndletyana, M. (2008). Affirmative action in the public service. In A. Habib & K. Bentley (Eds.), Racial redress and citizenship in South Africa (pp. 77–98). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  41. Paswan, S., & Jaideva, P. (Eds.). (2004). Encyclopedia of dalits in India: Reservation (Vol. 5). Delhi: Kalpaz Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Picard, L. A. (2005). The state of the state: Institutional transformation, capacity and political change in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  44. Ratuva, S. (2013). Politics of preferential development: Trans-global study of affirmative action and ethnic conflict in Fiji, Malaysia and South Africa. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  45. Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Malley, P. (2007). Shades of difference: Mac Maharaj and the struggle for South Africa. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  47. Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2017). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, No. 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Communication and Information System. https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996.
  48. Schuck, P. H. (2002). Affirmative action: Past, present, and future. Yale Law and Policy Review, 20, 1–96.Google Scholar
  49. Selden, S. C. (2006). A solution in search of a problem? Discrimination, affirmative action, and the new public service. Public Administration Review, 66, 911–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skrentny, J. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solidarity. (2013). Stop “race-firmative” action. Johannesburg: Solidarity. http://solidariteit.co.za/en/affirmative-action-campaign/.
  52. South African Institute of Race Relations (SOIRR). (1989). Race relations survey 1988/89. Johannesburg: SOIRR.Google Scholar
  53. Southall, R. (2013). Liberation movements in power: Party and state in southern africa. Woodbridge, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
  54. Theobald, N. A., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2008). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (2009). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  56. Tummala, K. K. (2015). Politics of preference: India, United States, and South Africa. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  57. Turgeon, L., & Gagnon, A. G. (2013). The politics of representative bureaucracy in multilingual states: A comparison of Belgium, Canada and Switzerland. Regional and Federal Studies, 23, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van de Walle, S., Groeneveld, S., & Vandenbussche, L. (2013). Representative bureaucracy in Belgium: Power sharing or diversity? In P. Von Maravic, B. G. Peters, & E. Schroter (Eds.), Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia (pp. 69–86). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Gool, B., & de Zwart, F. (2013). Politics of representative bureaucracy in India. In P. Von Maravic, B. G. Peters, & E. Schroter (Eds.), Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia (pp. 188–203). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Van Riper, P. P. (1958). The history of the U.S. Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
  61. Von Maravic, P., Peters, B. G., & Schroter, E. (Eds.). (2013). Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  62. Wildman, Stephanie M. (1996). Privilege revealed: How invisible preference undermines America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Fernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations