Advertisement

Digital Dices: Towards the Integration of Cyber-Physical Systems Merging the Web of Things and Microservices

  • Manel MenaEmail author
  • Javier Criado
  • Luis Iribarne
  • Antonio Corral
Conference paper
  • 382 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11815)

Abstract

One of the main issues of devices and platforms related to Internet of Things (IoT) is that there exists a broad spectrum of different protocols addressing those devices. Management and connection to those things create integrability and usability issues. Hence, there is a need for a solution that facilitates the communication between different devices and platforms. The Web of Things (WoT) tries to handle interoperability issues by describing interfaces and interaction patterns among things. Thanks to the models proposed by the WoT, it is possible to decouple the description of things from the protocols handling the communication and implementation strategies. This article proposes Digital Dice as an abstraction of IoT devices inspired by the concept of Digital Twin, but capable of leveraging the advantages of microservices architectures. We focus on the creation of Digital Dices from WoT models. A Digital Dice consists in different facets that are able to handle a particular aspect of a thing, hence different WoT descriptions models will result in different microservices related to that particular thing. An architecture to handle multiple Digital Dices and their replicas is also proposed.

Keywords

Cyber-physical systems IoT Microservices Web of Things Digital Twins 

References

  1. 1.
    Postscapes: IoT Standards and Protocols. https://bit.ly/2iAWbky. Accessed 24 May 2019
  2. 2.
    Ngu, A., Gutierrez, M., Metsis, V., Nepal, S., Sheng, Q.: IoT middleware: a survey on issues and enabling technologies. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(1), 1–20 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shetty S.: How to Use Digital Twins in Your IoT Strategy. https://gtnr.it/2FFU4al. Accessed 24 May 2019
  4. 4.
    Tuegel, E., Ingraffea, A., Eason, T., Spottswood, M.: Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2011, 14 p, (2011). Article ID 154798Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W3C: Web of Things. https://www.w3.org/WoT/. Accessed 28 May 2019
  6. 6.
    Mozilla Foundation: Mozilla IoT Web of Things. https://iot.mozilla.org/. Accessed 28 May 2019
  7. 7.
    Angsuchotmetee, C., Chbeir, R.: A survey on complex event definition languages in multimedia sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems, pp. 99–108. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nadareishvili, I., et al.: Microservice Architecture: Aligning Principles, Practices, and Culture. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Syst. J. 45(3), 621–645 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V.: Building the Web of Things: With Examples in Node.js and Raspberry Pi. Manning Publications Co., New York (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khanda, K., Salikhov, D., Gusmanov, K., Mazzara, M., Mavridis, N.: Microservice-based IoT for smart buildings. In: 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 302–308. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Long, S., Yan, L., Memon, R.H.: An open IoT framework based on microservices architecture. China Commun. 14(2), 154–162 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vresk, T., Čavrak, I.: Architecture of an interoperable IoT platform based on microservices. In: 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, pp. 1196–1201 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Small, N., Akkermans, S., Joosen, W., Hughes, D.: Niflheim: an end-to-end middleware for applications on a multi-tier IoT infrastructure. In: IEEE 16th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bauer, M., et al.: Internet of Things – Architecture IoT-A Deliverable D1.5 – Final architectural reference model for the IoT v3.0 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manel Mena
    • 1
    Email author
  • Javier Criado
    • 1
  • Luis Iribarne
    • 1
  • Antonio Corral
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Computing Group (TIC-211)University of AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain

Personalised recommendations