Advertisement

Sulfur Contamination in the Everglades, a Major Control on Mercury Methylation

  • William H. OremEmail author
  • David P. Krabbenhoft
  • Brett A. Poulin
  • George R. Aiken
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter sulfur contamination of the Everglades and its role as a major control on methylmercury (MeHg) production is examined. Sulfate concentrations over large portions of the Everglades (60% of the ecosystem) are elevated or greatly elevated compared to background conditions of <1 mg/L. Land and water management practices in south Florida are the primary reason for the high levels of sulfate loading to the Everglades. Marshes in the northern Everglades that are highly enriched in sulfate have average concentrations of 60 mg/L, but water in canals in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) contain the highest concentrations of sulfate averaging 60–70 mg/L. Studies that examined the mass balance of sulfur to the Everglades have determined that the primary sources of sulfate include: sulfur currently used in agriculture, and natural and legacy agricultural sulfur released by oxidation of organic soil within the EAA. The extensive loading of sulfate to the ecosystem increases microbial sulfate reduction, the dominant microbial process driving mercury methylation and MeHg production. The biogeochemical processes linking sulfate loading and MeHg production, however, are complex. MeHg production increases as sulfate levels rise from levels <1 mg/L up to about 20 mg/L. However, production of sulfide (a byproduct of microbial sulfate reduction) starts to inhibit MeHg production above 20 mg/L. Sulfate loading to canals in the EAA has impacted the northern Everglades the most, but the Everglades canal system can transport sulfate as far as Everglades National Park (ENP), 80 km further south. Plans to deliver more water to ENP as part of restoration may increase overall sulfate loads to the southern Everglades.

Reduction of sulfate loading should be a major goal of Everglades restoration because of the many negative effects of sulfate on the ecosystem. The ecosystem has been shown to respond quickly to reductions in sulfate loading, and strategies for reducing sulfate loading may produce positive outcomes for the Everglades in the near-term. Strategies for reducing sulfate loading will need to include: best management practices for agricultural use of sulfate, approaches to minimize soil oxidation in the EAA, and modifications to stormwater treatment areas to improve sulfate retention.

Keywords

Everglades Sulfur Mercury Water quality Sulfate reduction 

Abbreviations

BCNP

Big Cypress National Preserve

EAA

Everglades Agricultural Area

ENP

Everglades National Park

STA

Stormwater Treatment Area

WCA

Water Conservation Area

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the USGS Priority Ecosystems Studies for South Florida Program—Nick Aumen, Program Executive. Any use of trade, firm, or product names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS or the U.S. Government. All figures and tables used are original creations for this chapter. Thanks to Matthew Varonka, Anne Bates, Tiffani Schell, Cynthia Gilmour, John DeWild, and many others who contributed to the USGS Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades (ACME) Project over the years.

References

  1. Adelman IR, Smith LL (1970) Effect of hydrogen sulfide on northern pike eggs and sac fry. Trans Am Fish Soc 99:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken GR, Gilmour CC, Krabbenhoft DP, Orem W (2011) Dissolved organic matter in the Florida Everglades: implications for ecosystem restoration. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:217–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allam AI, Hollis JP (1972) Sulfide inhibition of oxidases in rice roots. Phytopathology 62:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altschuler ZS, Schnepfe MM, Silber CC, Simon FO (1983) Sulfur diagenesis in Everglades peat and origin of pyrite in coal. Science 221:221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong J, Armstrong W, Van der Putten WH (1996) Phragmites die-back: bud and root death, blockages within the aeration and vascular systems and the possible role of phytotoxins. New Phytol 133:399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkeson T, Axelrad D, Pollman C, Keeler G (2003) Integrating atmospheric mercury deposition and aquatic cycling in the Florida Everglades: an approach for conducting a total maximum daily load analysis for an atmospherically derived pollutant. Integrated summary. Final report. Florida Department of the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkeson TD, Pollman CD, Axelrad DM (2005) Chapter 26: Recent trends in Hg emissions, deposition, and biota in the Florida Everglades: a monitoring and modeling analysis. In: Pirrone N, Mahaffey K (eds) Dynamics of mercury pollution on regional and global scales: atmospheric processes, human exposure around the world. Springer, Norwell, MA, pp 637–656Google Scholar
  8. Axelrad DM, Lange T, Gabriel M, Atkeson TD, Pollman CD, Orem WH, Scheidt DJ, Kalla PI, Frederick PC, Gilmour CC (2008) Mercury and sulfur monitoring, research and environmental assessment in South Florida. South Florida environmental report, Chapter 3B, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 53 pGoogle Scholar
  9. Axelrad DM, Lange T, Atkeson TD, Gabriel MC (2009) Mercury and sulfur monitoring research and environmental assessment in South Florida. South Florida environmental report, Chapter 3B, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 32 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates AL, Spiker EC, Holmes CW (1998) Speciation and isotopic composition of sedimentary sulfur in the Everglades, Florida, USA. Chem Geol 146:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates AL, Orem WH, Harvey JW, Spiker EC (2001) Geochemistry of sulfur in the Florida Everglades; 1994 through 1999. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-0007, 54 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Bates AL, Orem WH, Harvey JW, Spiker EC (2002) Tracing sources of sulfur in the Florida Everglades. J Environ Qual 31:287–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Benoit JM, Gilmour CC, Mason RP (2001) The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbous propionicus (1pr3). Environ Sci Technol 35:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benoit JM, Gilmour CC, Heyes A, Mason RP, Miller CL (2003) Chapter 19: Geochemical and biological controls over methylmercury production and degradation in aquatic ecosystems. In: Cai Y, Braids OC (eds) Biogeochemistry of environmentally important trace elements, ACS symposium series, vol 835, pp 262–297Google Scholar
  15. Berner RA (1980) Early diagenesis: a theoretical approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p 241Google Scholar
  16. Boswell CC, Friesen DK (1993) Elemental sulfur fertilizers and their use on crops and pastures. Fert Res 35:127–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bottcher AB, Izuno FT (1994) Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA)—water, soil, crop, and environmental management. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL, p 318Google Scholar
  18. Brown E, Crooks JW (1955) Chemical character of surface waters in the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District. USGS Open File Report FL 55002, 13 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Casagrande DJ, Siefert K, Berschinski C, Sutton N (1977) Sulfur in peat-forming systems of the Okefenokee Swamp and Florida Everglades: origins of sulfur in coal. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 41:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Casagrande DJ, Idowu G, Friedman A, Rickert P, Siefert K, Schlenz D (1979) H2S incorporation in coal precursors: origins of organic sulphur in coal. Nature 282:599–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CH2MHILL (1978) Water quality studies in the Everglades Agricultural Area. Report submitted to the Florida Sugarcane League. Gainesville, FL, 136 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen M, Daroub SH, Lang TA, Diaz OA (2006) Specific conductance and ionic characteristics of farm canals in the Everglades Agricultural Area. J Environ Qual 35:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Childers DL, Doren RF, Jones R, Noe GB, Rugge M, Scinto LJ (2003) Decadal change in vegetation and soil phosphorus pattern across the Everglades landscape. J Environ Qual 32:344–362PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corrales J, Naja GM, Dziuba C, Rivero RG, Orem W (2011) Sulfate threshold target to control methylmercury levels in wetland ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 409:2156–2162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis SM (1994) Phosphorus inputs and vegetation sensitivity in the Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp 357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobermann A, Fairhurst TH (2000) Rice: nutrient disorders and nutrient management. Potash and Phosphate Institute, International Rice Research Institute, Singapore, Makati City, 254 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Drake HL, Aumen NG, Kuhner C, Wagner C, Griesshammer A, Schmittroth M (1996) Anaerobic microflora of Everglades sediments: effects of nutrients on population profiles and activities. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:486–493PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Dvonch JT, Graney JR, Keeler GJ, Stevens RK (1999) Use of elemental tracers to source apportion mercury in South Florida precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 33:4522–4527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dvonch JT, Keeler GJ, Marsik FJ (2005) The influence of meteorological conditions on the wet deposition of mercury in Southern Florida. J Appl Meteorol 44:1421–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fauque G, LeGall J, Barton LL (1991) Sulfate-reducing and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Shively JM, Barton LL (eds) Variations in autotrophic life. Academic, London, pp 271–337Google Scholar
  31. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1981) Specific conductance and ionic characteristics of the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida. National Park Service, Homestead, FL, Report T-615, 55 pGoogle Scholar
  32. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1982a) The response of specific conductance to environmental conditions in the Everglades National Park, Florida. Water Air Soil Pollut 17:51–59Google Scholar
  33. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1982b) Historical changes in the conductivity and ionic characteristics of the source water for the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 97:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Florida Department of Health (2003) Florida fish consumption advisories. ftp://ftp.dep.state.fl.us/pub/lab/assessment/mercury/fishadvisory/pdf. Accessed 29 June 2018
  35. Frederick PC, Spalding MG, Sepulveda MS, William G, Bouton S, Lynch H, Arrecis J, Lorezel S, Hoffman D (1997) Effects of environmental mercury exposure on reproduction, health and survival of wading birds in the Florida Everglades. Final report for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee, FL, 206 pGoogle Scholar
  36. Gabriel MC, Axelrad DM, Lange T, Dirk L (2010) Mercury and sulfur monitoring, research and environmental assessment in South Florida. In: 2010 South Florida environmental report, Chapter 3B, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 49 pGoogle Scholar
  37. Gabriel MC, Howard N, Osborne TZ (2014) Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades protection area. Environ Manag 53:583–593.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0224-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gao S, Tanji KK, Scardaci SC (2003) Incorporating straw may induce sulfide toxicity in paddy rice. Calif Agric 57:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garrett B, Ivanoff D (2008) Hydropattern restoration in Water Conservation Area 2A. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in Fulfillment of Permit # 0126704-001-GL (STA-2), by the STA Management Division, South Florida Water Management District, 113 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilmour C, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:2287–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gilmour C, Riedel GS, Ederington MC, Bell JT, Benoit JM, Gill GA, Stordal MC (1998) Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the Northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40:327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilmour CC, Krabbenhoft D, Orem W, Aiken G (2004) Appendix 2B-1: influence of drying and rewetting on mercury and sulfur cycling in Everglades and STA soils. In: 2004 Everglades consolidated report, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  43. Gilmour C, Krabbenhoft D, Orem W, Aiken G, Roden E (2007a) Status report on ACME studies on the control of Hg methylation and bioaccumulation in the Everglades. In: 2007 South Florida environmental report, Appendix 3B-2, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 37 pGoogle Scholar
  44. Gilmour C, Orem W, Krabbenhoft D, Roy S, Mendelssohn I (2007b) Preliminary assessment of sulfur sources, trends and effects in the Everglades. In: 2007 South Florida environmental report, Appendix 3B-3, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 46 pGoogle Scholar
  45. Gilmour CC et al (2011) Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3938–3951PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gleason PJ (ed) (1974) Environments of South Florida: present and past. Miami Geological Society, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  47. Guentzel JL, Landing WM, Gill GA, Pollman CD (1995) Atmospheric deposition of mercury in Florida: the fams project (1992–1994). Water Air Soil Pollut 80:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Guentzel JL, Landing WM, Gill GA, Pollman CD (2001) Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida. Environ Sci Technol 35:863–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gunderson LH, Snyder JR (1994) Fire patterns in the Southern Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp 291–305Google Scholar
  50. Haggerty GM, Bowman RS (2002) Sorption of chromate and other inorganic anions by organo-zeolite. Environ Sci Technol 28(3):452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harvey JW, McCormick PV (2009) Groundwater’s significance to changing hydrology, water chemistry, and biological communities of a floodplain ecosystem, Everglades, South Florida, USA. Hydrogeol J 17:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harvey JW, Newlin JT, Krupa SL (2006) Modeling decadal timescale interactions between surface water and ground water in the central Everglades, Florida, USA. J Hydrol 320:400–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hawkesford MJ, DeKok LJ (2007) Sulfur in plants: an ecological perspective. Springer, Dordrecht, p 264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Heitmann T, Blodau C (2006) Oxidation and incorporation of hydrogen sulfide by dissolved organic matter. Chem Geol 235:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hotes S, Adema E, Grootjans A, Inoue T, Poschlod P (2005) Reed die-back related to increased sulfide concentration in a coastal mire in Eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Wetl Ecol Manag 13:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. James RT, McCormick P (2012) The sulfate budget of a shallow subtropical lake. Fundam Appl Limnol 181(4):253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. James RT, Jones BL, Smith VH (1995) Historical trends in the Lake Okeechobee ecosystem II. Nutrient budgets. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 107:25–47Google Scholar
  58. Jeremiason JD, Engstrom DR, Swain EB, Nater EA, Johnson BM, Almendinger JE, Monson BA, Kolka RK (2006) Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ Sci Technol 40:3800–3806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Joyner BF (1974) Chemical and biological conditions of Lake Okeechobee, Florida, 1969–70. Open-File Report 71006. U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  60. Jurczyk NU (1993) An ecological risk assessment of the impact of mercury contamination in the Florida Everglades. MS thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  61. Katz BG, Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Revesz KM, Jones BF, Lee TM (1995) Chemical evolution of groundwater near a Sinkhole Lake, Northern Florida, 2. Chemical patterns, mass-transfer modeling, and rates of chemical reactions. Water Resour Res 31:1564–1584Google Scholar
  62. Keeler GJ, Marsik FJ, Al-Wali KI, Dvonch JT (2001) Appendix 7–6: status of the atmospheric dispersion and deposition model. In: 2001 Everglades consolidated report. South Florida Water Management District and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  63. Klein H, Hull JE (1978) Biscayne aquifer, Southeast Florida. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 78-107, 52 pGoogle Scholar
  64. Koch MS, Mendelssohn IA (1989) Sulfide as a soil phytotoxin: differential responses in two marsh species. J Ecol 77:565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Koch MS, Reddy KR (1992) Distribution of soil and plant nutrients along a trophic gradient in the Florida Everglades. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1492–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Koch MS, Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL (1990) Mechanism for the hydrogen sulfide-induced growth limitation in wetland macrophytes. Limnol Oceanogr 35:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lamers LM, Tomassen HM, Roelofs JM (1998) Sulfate-induced eutrophication and phytotoxicity in freshwater wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 32:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Landing W (2015) Peer-review report on the Everglades Agricultural Area regional sulfur mass balance: technical webinar. In: 2015 South Florida environmental report, Appendix 3B-2, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, 44 pGoogle Scholar
  69. Li S, Mendelssohn IA, Chen H, Orem WH (2009) Does sulfate enrichment promote Typha domingensis (cattail) expansion into the Cladium jamaicence (sawgrass)-dominated Florida Everglades? Freshw Biol 54:1909–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lissner J, Mendelssohn IA, Lorenzen B, Brix H, McKee KL, Miao S (2003) Interactive effects of redox intensity and phosphate availability on growth and nutrient relations of Cladium jamaicense (Cyperaceae). Am J Bot 90:736–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lockwood JL, Ross MS, Sah JP (2003) Smoke on the water: the interplay of fire and water flow on Everglades restoration. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Love SK (1955) Quality of ground and surface waters. In: Parker G, Ferguson GE, Love SK, others (eds) Water resources of Southeastern Florida with special reference to the geology and ground water of the Miami area, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1255, Washington, DC, pp 727–833Google Scholar
  73. Maglio M, Krabbenhoft D, Tate M, DeWild J, Ogorek J, Thompson C, Aiken G, Orem W, Kline J, Castro J, Gilmour C (2015) Drivers of geospatial and temporal variability in the distribution of mercury and methylmercury in Everglades National Park. GEER meeting, Coral Springs, FL, April 2015. Program and AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  74. Marvin-DiPasquale M, Windham-Myers L, Agee JL, Kakouros E, Kieu le H, Fleck JA, Alpers CN, Stricker CA (2014) Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California, USA. Sci Total Environ 484:288–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCormick PV, Harvey JW (2011) Influence of changing water sources and mineral chemistry on the Everglades ecosystem. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):28–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McCormick PV, James RT (2008) Lake Okeechobee: regional sulfate source, sink, or reservoir? Presented at the 19th Annual Florida Lake Management Society Conference and 2008 NALMS Southeast Regional Conference, June 3, 2008Google Scholar
  77. McCormick PV, Rawlick PS, Lurding K, Smith EP, Sklar FH (1996) Periphyton–water quality relationships along a nutrient gradient in the Florida Everglades. J N Am Benthol Soc 15:433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McCormick PV, Newman S, Miao S, Gawlik DE, Marley D, Reddy KR, Fontaine TD (2002) Effects of anthropogenic phosphorus inputs on the Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida keys, an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 83–126Google Scholar
  79. McCoy CW, Nigg HN, Timmer LW, Futch SH (2003) Use of pesticides in citrus IPM. In: Timmer LW (ed) 2003 Florida citrus pest management guide. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural ServicesGoogle Scholar
  80. Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL (1988) Spartina alterniflora dieback in Louisiana: time course investigation of soil waterlogging effects. J Ecol 76:509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Meyer B (1977) Sulfur, energy, and environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 457Google Scholar
  82. Miao S, Newman S, Sklar FH (2000) Effects of habitat nutrients and seed sources on growth and expansion of Typha domingensis. Aquat Bot 68:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Michaud JP, Grant AKJ (2003) Sub-lethal effects of a copper sulfate fungicide on development and reproduction in three coccinellid species. J Insect Sci 3:16–22PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Miller WL (1988) Description and evaluation of the effects of urban and agricultural development on the surficial aquifer system, Palm Beach County, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4056Google Scholar
  85. Mitchell MJ, Mayer B, Bailey SW et al (2001) Use of stable isotope ratios for evaluating sulfur sources and losses at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. In: Proceedings of acid rain 2000, Japan. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mitchell CPJ, Branfireun BA, Kolka RK (2008) Assessing sulfate and carbon controls on net methylmercury production in peatlands: an in situ mesocosm approach. Appl Geochem 23:503–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Morgan MD (1990) Streams in the New Jersey pinelands directly reflect changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. J Environ Qual 19(2):296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Morgan MD, Good RE (1988) Stream chemistry in the New Jersey pinelands: the influence of precipitation and watershed disturbance. Water Resourc Res 24:1091–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Morse JW, Luther GW III (1999) Chemical influences on trace metal-sulfide interactions in anoxic sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:3373–3378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Munthe J, Bodaly R, Branfireun B, Driscoll C, Gilmour C, Harris R, Horvat M, Lucotte M, Malm O (2007) Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36:33–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. NADP, National Atmospheric Deposition Program (2008) National Atmospheric Deposition Program data, site FL11, annual data summaries. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/default.html
  92. National Research Council (1979) Hydrogen sulfide. University Park Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  93. Ogden JC, Robertson WB, Davis GE, Schmidt TW (1974) Pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and heavy metals in upper food chain levels, Everglades National Park and vicinity. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Technical Information Service, No. PB-235 359Google Scholar
  94. Orem WH (2004) Impacts of sulfate contamination on the Florida Everglades ecosystem. USGS Fact Sheet FS 109-03, 4 pGoogle Scholar
  95. Orem W (2007) Sulfur contamination in the Florida Everglades: initial examination of mitigation strategies. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1374, 53 pp. http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/2007-1374/
  96. Orem WH, Lerch HE, Rawlik P (1997) Descriptive geochemistry of surface and pore water from USGS 1994 and 1995 coring sites in South Florida wetlands. USGS Open-File Report 97-454, 70 pGoogle Scholar
  97. Orem W, Gilmour C, Axelrad D, Krabbenhoft D, Scheidt D, Kalla P, McCormick P, Gabriel M, Aiken G (2011) Sulfur in the South Florida ecosystem: distribution, sources, biogeochemistry, impacts, and management for restoration. Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):249–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Orem W, Newman S, Osborne TZ, Reddy KR (2014) Projecting changes in Everglades soil biogeochemistry for carbon and other key elements, to possible 2060 climate and hydrologic scenarios. Environ Manag 55:776–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Orem WH, Fitz C, Krabbenhoft D, Tate M, Gilmour C, Shafer M (2015) Modeling sulfate transport and distribution and methylmercury production associated with aquifer storage and recovery implementation in the everglades protection area. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3–4:33–46Google Scholar
  100. Parker GG, Ferguson GE, Love SK et al (1955) Water resources of Southeastern Florida—with special reference to the geology and ground water of the interior Miami area. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1255, pp 1–4, 157Google Scholar
  101. Payne GG, Xue SK, Weaver KC (2009) Chapter 3A: Status of water quality in the Everglades protection area. In: 2009 South Florida environmental report—volume I. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  102. Perry W (2008) Everglades restoration and water quality challenges in South Florida. Ecotoxicology 17:569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pfeuffer R, Rand G (2004) South Florida ambient pesticide monitoring Program. Ecotoxicology 13:195–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pietro K, Bearzotti R, Germain G, Iricanin N (2009) Chapter 5: STA performance, compliance and optimization. In: 2009 South Florida Environmental Report, vol I. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  105. Pollman CD (2012) Modeling sulfate and Gambusia mercury relationships in the Everglades. Final reported submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee, FL. Aqua Lux Lucis, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  106. Pollman CD (2014) Mercury cycling and trophic state in aquatic ecosystems: implications from structural equation modeling. Sci Total Environ 499:62–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Pollman CD, Canfield DE Jr (1991) Florida. In: Charles DF (ed) Acid deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case studies. Springer, New York, pp 367–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Poulin BA, Ryan JN, Nagy KL, Stubbins A, Dittmar T, Orem W, Krabbenhoft DP, Aiken GR (2017) Spatial dependence of reduced sulfur in everglades dissolved organic matter controlled by sulfate enrichment. Environ Sci Technol 51:3630–3639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Price RM, Swart PK (2006) Geochemical indicators of groundwater recharge in the surficial aquifer system, Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. GSA Spec Pap 404:251–266.  https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2404(21) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Priyantha N, Perera S (2000) Water Resour Manag 14(6):417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Radell MJ, Katz BG (1991) Major-ion and selected trace metal chemistry of the Biscayne Aquifer, Southeast Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 91-4009. Tallahassee, FL, 18 pGoogle Scholar
  112. Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Chimney MJ (2006) The Everglades nutrient removal project. Ecol Eng 27:265–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Restoration, Coordination and Verification (2007) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan system-wide performance measuresGoogle Scholar
  114. Rice RW, Gilbert RA, Lentini RS (2006) Nutritional requirements for florida sugarcane. Document SS-AGR-228 of the Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Online at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SC028
  115. Richardson CJ, Ferrell GM, Vaithiyanathan P (1999) Nutrient effects on stand structure, resorption efficiency, and secondary compounds in Everglades sawgrass. Ecology 80:2182–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rumbold DG, Lange TR, Axelrad DM, Atkeson TD (2008) Ecological risk of methylmercury in Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Ecotoxicology 17(7):632–641.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0234-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Scheidt DJ, Kalla PI (2007) Everglades ecosystem assessment: water management and quality, eutrophication, mercury contamination, soils and habitat: monitoring for adaptive management: a R-EMAP status report. USEPA Region 4. EPA 904-R-07-001. Athens, GA, 98 p. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/sesd/reports/epa904r07001/epa904r07001.pdf
  118. Scheidt D, Stober J, Jones R, Thornton K (2000) South Florida ecosystem assessment: water management, soil loss, eutrophication and habitat. United States Environmental Protection Agency Report 904-R-00-003. Atlanta, GA, 46 p. http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/reports/epa904r00003/epa904r00003.pdf
  119. Scherer MM, Richter S, Valentine RL, Alvarez PJJ (2008) Chemistry and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for groundwater clean up. Crit Rev Microbiol 26(4):221–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Schueneman TJ (2000) Characterization of sulfur sources in the EAA. Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla Proc 60:20–22Google Scholar
  121. Schueneman TJ, Sanchez CA (1994) Vegetable production in the EAA. In: Bottcher AB, Izuno FT (eds) Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA): water, soil, crop, and environmental management. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL, pp 238–277Google Scholar
  122. SFWMD (2009) DBHYDRO. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL. http://my.sfwmd.gov/dbhydroplsql/show_dbkey_info.main_menu
  123. Shen Y, Buick R (2004) The antiquity of microbial sulfate reduction. Earth Sci Rev 64:243–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Smith LL Jr, Oseid DM, Adelman LR, Broderius SJ (1976) Effect of hydrogen sulfide on fish and invertebrates, part I. Acute and Chronic Toxicity Studies, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., USA (1976) EPA-600/3-76-062aGoogle Scholar
  125. Smolders AJP, Nijboer RC, Roelofs JGM (1995) Prevention of sulfide accumulation and phosphate mobilization by the addition of iron(II) chloride to a reduced sediment: an enclosure experiment. Freshw Biol 34:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Smolders AJP, Lamers LPM, den Hartog C, Roelofs JGM (2003) Mechanisms involved in the decline of Stratiotes aloides L. in The Netherlands: sulphate as a key variable. Hydrobiologia 506–509:603–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Smolders AJP, Lamers LPM, Lucassen ECHET, Van der Velde G, Roelofs JGM (2006) Internal eutrophication: how it works and what to do about it—a review. Chem Ecol 22:93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stober J, Scheidt D, Jones R, Thornton K, Ambrose R, France D (1996) South Florida ecosystem assessment. Monitoring for adaptive management: implications for ecosystem restoration. Interim report. United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA-904-R-96-008Google Scholar
  129. Stober J, Thornton K, Jones R, Richards J, Ivey C, Welch R, Madden M, Trexler J, Gaiser E, Scheidt D, Rathbun S (2001) South Florida ecosystem assessment: phase I/II summary report. Everglades stressor interactions: hydropatterns, eutrophication, habitat alteration, and mercury contamination. EPA 904-R-01-002. USEPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division. Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  130. Tabatabai MA (1984) Importance of sulphur in crop production. Biogeochemistry 1:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Thurston RV, Russo RC, Fetterolf CM Jr, Edsall TA, Barber YM Jr (1979) A review of the EPA Red Book: quality criteria for water. Water Quality Section, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  132. Ullman WJ, Aller RC (1982) Diffusion coefficients in nearshore marine sediments limnol. Oceanography 27:552–556Google Scholar
  133. USEPA (1976) Quality criteria for water. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  134. USEPA (2006) Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) 2005 Annual Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Clean Air Markets Division, Washington, DC, 48 pp. plus references and appendices. http://www.epa.gov/castnet
  135. Vairavamurthy MA, Schoonen MAA, Eglinton TI, Luther GW III, Manowitz B (1995) Geochemical transformations of sedimentary sulfur, American Chemical Society Symposium Series 612. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  136. Van der Welle MEW, Cuppens M, Lamers LPM, Roelofs JGM (2006) Detoxifying toxicants: interactions between sulfide and iron toxicity in freshwater wetlands. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1592–1597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Vismann B (1996) Sulfide species and total sulfide toxicity in the shrimp Crangon crangon. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 204:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wang F, Chapman PM (1999) Biological implications of sulfide in sediment—a review focusing on sediment toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2526–2532Google Scholar
  139. Wang H, Waldon M, Meselhe E, Arceneaux J, Chen C, Harwell M (2009) Surface water sulfate dynamics in the Northern Florida Everglades. J Environ Qual 38:734–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. William O, Gilmour C, Axelrad D, Krabbenhoft D, Scheidt D, Kalla P, McCormick P, Gabriel M, Aiken G (2011) Sulfur in the South Florida ecosystem: distribution, sources, biogeochemistry, impacts, and management for restoration. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(Supp 1):249–288Google Scholar
  141. Wu Y, Sklar FH, Gopu K, Rutchey K (1996) Fire simulations in the Everglades landscape using parallel programming. Ecol Model 93:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Ye R, Wright AL, Orem WH, McCray JM (2010) Sulfur distribution and transformations in everglades agricultural area soil as influenced by sulfur amendment. Soil Sci 175(6):263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Orem
    • 1
    Email author
  • David P. Krabbenhoft
    • 2
  • Brett A. Poulin
    • 3
  • George R. Aiken
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyRestonUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyMiddletonUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations