Advertisement

Affective Aging on Different Time-Scales

  • Marko KatanaEmail author
  • Patrick L. Hill
Chapter
  • 74 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 26)

Abstract

The study of affective aging provides unique insights into how personality influences healthy aging, as well as the assessment challenges associated with capturing personality states, traits, and processes. This chapter will give an overview about the current literature on affective aging. First, age differences and long-term change of affect will be presented and put into relation to well-established theoretical frameworks about aging. Second, the chapter will summarize current and state-of-the-art technologies of assessing state affect in everyday life, and how they serve as an extension to traditional measurements of trait affect. Third, example of correlates of state affect in the current aging literature are illustrated with regard to the impact of personality. Future avenues of affective aging research will be discussed by accounting for daily context and structure.

Keywords

Affect Emotion Lifespan development Healthy aging Emotional wellbeing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Work on the manuscript was supported by a grant from the Jacobs Foundation to the first author. During the work on his dissertation, Marko Katana was a pre-doctoral fellow of the International Max Planck Research School on the Life Course (LIFE, www.imprs-life.mpg.de; participating institutions: Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University of Michigan, University of Virginia, University of Zurich). Thank you to Christina Röcke for her feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References

  1. Birditt, K. S., Fingerman, K. L., & Almeida, D. M. (2005). Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 330–340.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boker, S. M. (2013). Selection, optimization, compensation, and equilibrium dynamics. Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 29, 61–73. Retrieved from http://people.virginia CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 127–160.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_06 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Greve, W. (1993). Adaptive resources of the aging self: Outlines of an emergent perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16(2), 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brose, A., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2015). Ambulatory assessment in the research on aging: Contemporary and future applications. Gerontology, 61, 372–380.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000371707 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Normal aging dampens the link between intrusive thoughts and negative affect in reaction to daily Stressors. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 488–502.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022287 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.115.3.401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.54.3.165 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1068–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021232 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2007). Emotion regulation and aging. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 307–320). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Charles, S. T., Luong, G., Almeida, D. M., Ryff, C., Sturm, M., & Love, G. (2010). Fewer ups and downs: Daily stressors mediate age differences in negative affect. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan, M. J., Badland, H. M., & Mummery, W. K. (2009). Applying GPS to enhance understanding of transport-related physical activity. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12, 549–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.10.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662–676.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assodates Inc..Google Scholar
  18. Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and Bipolarity in the Structure of Current Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967–984. Retrieved from https://www.homeworkforyou.com/static/uploadedfiles/User_2768452013psp-74-4-967.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1409 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642–662.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.531 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Freund, A. M., & Riediger, M. (2003). Successful aging. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 601–628). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Gruber, J., Kogan, A., Quoidbach, J., & Mauss, I. B. (2013). Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion, 1, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruenenfelder-Steiger, A. E., Katana, M., Martin, A. A., Aschwanden, D., Koska, J. L., Kündig, Y., … Allemand, M. (2017). Physical activity and depressive mood in the daily life of older adults. Geropsychiatry, 30, 119–129.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamaker, E. L. (2012). Why researchers should think within-person. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). New York, NY/London, UK: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(6), 820–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hay, E. L., & Diehl, M. (2011). Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 8, 157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0191-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Heckhausen, J. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102(2), 284–304.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.284 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 1–53.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668.A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoppmann, C. A., & Riediger, M. (2009). Ambulatory assessment in lifespan psychology: An overview of current status and new trends. European Psychologist, 14, 98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kanning, M., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Brand, R. (2012). Autonomous regulation mode moderates the effect of actual physical activity on affective States: An ambulant assessment approach to the role of self-determination. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(2), 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kanning, M., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Schlicht, W. M. (2015). Using activity triggered e-diaries to reveal the associations between physical activity and affective states in older adult’s daily living. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 111.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0272-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanning, M., & Hansen, S. (2017). Need satisfaction moderates the association between physical activity and affective states in adults Aged 50+: an activity-triggered ambulatory assessment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51, 18–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9824-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kunzmann, U., Kappes, C., & Wrosch, C. (2014). Emotional aging: A discrete emotions perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00380
  36. Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1042–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020962 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: Affect, cognition and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 201–206.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01262.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen, J. T. (2017). Holes in the case for mixed emotions. Emotion Review, 9, 118–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mroczek, D. K., & Almeida, D. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355–378.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00265.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Neupert, S. D., Almeida, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (2007). Age differences in reactivity to daily stressors: The role of personal control. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B(4), 216–225. Retrieved from https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/psychsocgerontology/62/4/10.1093/geronb/62.4.P216/2/P216.pdf?Expires=1502279827&Signature=LrF6l83bTXq0FNvSAaFuH72Z~VEIaUIuWWjNpWW-tphQ89VedHofhvDxNzTZdV4Vf-F1JWJE6PCcD9lO7Q~bR0XFc9uHsE~5r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ong, A. D., & Bergeman, C. S. (2004). The complexity of emotions in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59, 117–122.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.3.P117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinquart, M. (2001). Correlates of subjective health in older adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 414–426.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.16.3.414 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Ready, R. E., Åkerstedt, A. M., & Mroczek, D. K. (2012). Emotional complexity and emotional well-being in older adults: Risks of high neuroticism. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.602961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ready, R. E., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). Do older individuals adapt to their traits?: Personality-emotion relations among younger and older adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1020–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts, B. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Röcke, C., & Brose, A. (2013). Intraindividual variability and stability of affect and well-being. Geropsychiatry, 26, 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Röcke, C., Brose, A., & Kuppens, P. (2018). Emotion dynamics in older age. In P. M. Cole & T. Hollenstein (Eds.), Emotion regulation: A matter of time (pp. 179–207). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Röcke, C., Hoppmann, C. A., & Klumb, P. L. (2011). Correspondence between retrospective and momentary ratings of positive and negative affect in old age: Findings from a one-year measurement burst. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 66B, 411–415.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Röcke, C., Li, S., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863–878.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016276 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell, J. A. (2017). Mixed emotions viewed from the psychological constructionist perspective. Emotion Review, 9(2), 111–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51(7), 702–714. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d87c/3eefb33a833668d7d97859e96d1f7d882d4f.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1991). Social support and health: A theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2008). How to overcome health-compromising behaviors the health action process approach. European Psychologist, 13(2), 141–151.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2013). Age differences in emotional responses to daily stress: The role of timing, severity, and global perceived stress. Psychology and Aging, 28, 1076–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151–176.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. World Health Organization. (2015). World report on aging and health. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf?ua=1
  62. Wrzus, C., Luong, G., Wagner, G. G., & Riediger, M. (2015). Can’t get it out of my head: Age differences in affective responsiveness vary with preoccupation and elapsed time after daily hassles. Emotion, 15, 257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wrzus, C., Müller, V., Wagner, G. G., Lindenberger, U., & Riediger, M. (2013). Affective and cardiovascular responding to unpleasant events from adolescence to old age: Complexity of events matters. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 384–397.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and University Research Priority Program “Dynamics of Healthy Aging”University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations