Advertisement

Party Leaders in Romania: Designated Successors or Tactical Players?

  • Clara Volintiru
  • Sergiu Gherghina
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology book series (PSPP)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on two leaders belonging to influential parties in Romanian politics: Emil Boc (PDL) and Victor Ponta (PSD). We aimed to include those leaders that would allow an analysis of the relationship between their personality and behavior, and the general evolution of the party. Our analysis, consistent with the general goal of this book, seeks to test the leadership’s impact on party organization in terms of electoral performance, intra-party cohesion and membership. Both party leaders were also prime ministers in turbulent times, which makes the comparison even more interesting.

Keywords

Protégé Gradual ascension Confidence Awareness Party membership 

References

  1. Close, C., & Gherghina, S. (2019). Rethinking intra-party cohesion: Towards a conceptual and analytical framework. Party Politics (online first).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819836044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duţulescu, A. (2011, May 15). Băsescu a plâns din nou şi a câştigat Convenţia PDL [Băsescu cried again and won the PDL Congress]. Jurnalul.Ro. Retrieved from https://jurnalul.antena3.ro/stiri/politica/basescu-a-plans-din-nou-si-a-castigat-conventia-pdl-578098.html.
  3. Gallagher, T. (2005). Theft of a nation: Romania since communism. London: Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Gherghina, S. (2014). Party organization and electoral volatility in central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing voter loyalty. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gherghina, S., & Miscoiu, S. (Eds.). (2010). Partide si personalitati popuiste in România postcomunista [Populist political parties and leaders in post-communist Romania]. Iasi: Institutul European.Google Scholar
  6. Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2017). A new model of clientelism: Political parties, public resources, and private contributors. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. HotNews. (2010a, February 20). Victor Ponta este noul presedinte al PSD [Victor Ponta is the new PSD president]. HotNews.Ro.Google Scholar
  8. HotNews. (2010b, March 11). Emil Boc: PNL a intins mana celor care au colaborat cu fosta Securitate [Emil Boc: PNL gave a hand to those who collaborated with the former Securitate]. HotNews.Ro. Retrieved from http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-8378914-.htm?nomobile.
  9. King, R. F., & Marian, C. G. (2014). Antagonism and austerity: The December 2012 Romanian parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies, 34, 310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mediafax. (2013, April 21). Congresul PSD: Victor Ponta a avut 3851 voturi “pentru” din 3932 valabil exprimate [The PSD Congress: Victor Ponta had 3851 votes “in favor” out of 3932 valid votes]. Mediafax.Ro. Retrieved from https://www.mediafax.ro/politic/congresul-psd-victor-ponta-a-avut-3851-voturi-pentru-din-3932-valabil-exprimate-voturile-inregistrate-pentru-fiecare-functie-10775482.
  11. Mughan, A. (2000). Media and the presidentialization of parliamentary elections. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (Eds.). (2005). The presidentialization of politics: A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pop-Eleches, G. (1999). Separated at birth or separated by birth? The communist successor parties in Romania and Hungary. East European Politics and Societies, 13(1), 117–147.Google Scholar
  14. Pop-Eleches, G. (2014). Romania twenty years after 1989: The Bizarre Echoes of a contested revolution. In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty years after communism: The politics of memory and commemoration (pp. 85–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stan, L., & Vancea, D. (Eds.). (2015). Post-communist Romania at twenty-five: Linking past, present, and future. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Volintiru, C. (2016). Clientelism and cartelization in post-communist Europe: The case of Romania (Doctoral dissertation). London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
  17. Webb, P., Poguntke, T., & Kolodny, R. (2012). The presidentialization of party leadership? Evaluating party leadership and party government in the democratic world. In L. Helms (Ed.), Comparative political leadership (pp. 77–98). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clara Volintiru
    • 1
  • Sergiu Gherghina
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of International Business and EconomicsBucharest University of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of PoliticsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations