Advertisement

Special Economic Zone of the Tourist and Recreation Type as a Tool of Regional Policy

  • Natalia S. BeskorovaynayaEmail author
  • Elena V. Khokhlova
  • Ilya V. Ermakov
  • Zukhra S. Dotdueva
  • Vitaly V. Lang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 91)

Abstract

Unsuccessful attempts to create special economic zones in several subjects of the Russian Federation, which have the corresponding natural conditions and resources, for the purpose of development of tourism and regional economy, actualize the problem of their economic substantiation and formation of the corresponding normative and methodological provision.

The purpose of the article is to determine the main factors that determine successfulness of implementing the projects for creation of special economic zones of the tourist and recreation type in Russian Federation and to improve organizational foundations of managing the development of territories that have tourist potential.

Methodology. In the recent years, the number of scientific works devoted to the problem of increase of effectiveness of functioning of special economic zones of various types in Russia has increased. However, most studies reflect peculiarities of development of successful zones – as a rule – technical and implementation, as well as theoretical aspects of their influence – on the territorial economy. At that, not enough attention is paid to the issues of economic substantiation of special zones of the tourist and recreation type as a tool of regional policy.

Analysis of the state of sanatorium-resort sphere in Stavropol Krai has been performed on the basis of statistical information, with the use of the methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, systemic methods, etc.

Results. The resorts of the Caucasian Spas, most of which are located in Stavropol Krai, possess unique natural and geographic resources and the balneological basis. However, the quality of recreation services is low, and the municipal resort infrastructure is very old. The services’ consumers are the Russian population (more than 90% of the general number of the customers). Thus, there’s necessity for state support for development of the territorial resort complex.

Miscalculations and mistakes at the stage of substantiation of the project of a special economic zone in Stavropol Krai, which constituted in planning the construction of the resort infrastructure on new territories and orientation at new tourist products, which required large budget investments, became the reasons for its incompleteness. Besides, it is necessary to note the existing uncertainty of the order of actions for creation of a special economic zone, ignoring the dynamics of demand for recreation services, and the consequences of influence on the environment. However, such projects allow for receipt of large federal investments into modernization and reconstruction of old resort infrastructure of municipal entities.

Conclusions. It is concluded that special economic zone of the tourist and recreation type could be an effective tool of regional policy that implements a complex approach to management, oriented at activation of economic environment. At that, all efforts should be aimed at development of existing resort infrastructure and tourist business, and after that – at formation of new recreational territory.

Substantiation of the necessity for creation of special economic area should be based on criteria of sustainability of the project, its significance for development of the region, and economic effectiveness.

Keywords

Special economic zone Regional policy Effectiveness of functioning of special economic zone Tourism Sanatorium and resort activities Tourist cluster 

JEL Code

O 18 R 12 

References

  1. Asian economic integration report 2015: How can special economic zones catalyze economic development? Asian Development Bank Publications, Mandaluyong City. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/177205/asian-economic-integration-report-2015.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2017
  2. Beskorovaynaya, N., Rubchevskaya, T.A.: Strategy for sustainable development of the region in conditions of globalization. In: Regularities and Tendencies of Development of Science in Modern Society Proceeding of the International Scientific-Practical Conference in Ufa, Russia, 2016, LLC Aeterna, pp. 42–44 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Bohmer, A., Farid, N.: Designing Economic Zones for Effective Investment Promotion (2010). http://www.oecd.org/mena/investment/44866506.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2017
  4. Bolshakov, A.I.: Formation and development of cross-border tourism clusters, Moscow (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Erokhina, E.V.: Influence of areas with special economic status on the spatial development of the regions. Nat. Interests Priorities Secur. 36(321), 12–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. Farole, T., Akinci, G.: Special Economic Zones Progress, Emerging Challenges, and Future Directions. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2011). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2341/638440PUB0Exto00Box0361527B0PUBLIC0.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2017
  7. Federal State Statistics Service (2016). Russia in figures 2016, The concise statistical handbook, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  8. Khokhlova, E.V., Pashayev, M.J.: Special economic zone in the Chechen republic. In: The Scientific Mechanisms for the Resolution of Problems of Innovative Development, Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference in Ufa, Russia, 2017, LLC Aeterna, pp. 211–217 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Kropinova, E.G., Mitrofanova, A.V.: Regional-geographical approach to the concept of tourism and recreation cluster, Vestnik Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, vol 1, pp. 70–75 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Kropova, A.A.: Evolution of special economic zones in Russia. Young Sci. 4(108), 429–431 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. McCallum, J.K.: Export processing zones: Comparative Data from China, Honduras. Nicaragua and South Africa (2011). http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_dialogue/—dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_158364.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2017
  12. Pavlov, P.V.: System of indicators for assessing the functioning of special economic zones. Finan. Credit 29(365), 2–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Pavlov, P.V.: Institute of Special Economic Zones in the Russian Federation: Financial, Legal and Organizational-Economic Aspects of Functioning. Magistr, Moscow (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Peredkova, I.V.: Organizational and economic mechanism of formation of special economic areas. Socio-Econ. Phenom. Process. 9(55), 93–97 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Prihodko, S., Volovik, N.: Special Economic Zones. Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Advice, IET, Moscow (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Rodrigues, A.B.: Turismo rural: práticas e perspectivas. Contexto, Sao Paulo (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Selivanova, E.V.: International and Russian experience of creation of special economic zones for tourism and recreation: problems and prospects. Sci. Bull. SevKavGTI 1(24), 46–50 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. Territorial body of Federal state statistics service of the Stavropol territory (2016). The resort-tourist complex of the Stavropol territory for 2011–2015, Statistical compilationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia S. Beskorovaynaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena V. Khokhlova
    • 1
  • Ilya V. Ermakov
    • 1
  • Zukhra S. Dotdueva
    • 1
  • Vitaly V. Lang
    • 1
  1. 1.North Caucasus Federal UniversityStavropolRussia

Personalised recommendations