Advertisement

Appellations of Origin of Goods as a Tool of Socio-Economic Development and Preservation of Cultural Diversity of Russia in the Context of Globalization

  • Irina V. SamsonovaEmail author
  • Elena V. Andreeva
  • Anna A. Neizvestnykh
  • Vasilii V. Skriabin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 91)

Abstract

One of the causes of tension and instability of the ethnic group as a social system, today are the processes of globalization. Issues of preservation and development of traditional knowledge of the ethnic group through folk art crafts, as a tool for preservation of cultural diversity and social basis of society in conditions of globalization. It has received great attention from both scientists and practitioners.

The purpose of this study is a comparative analysis of approaches to legal protection of products of traditional crafts as objects of intellectual property. Consideration from the point of view of evolutionary, systemic approaches the development of crafts in various countries of the world and Russian Federation.

The methodology for studying the content of discussions consists of: development of conceptual apparatus, opinions of experts, statistical (quantitative) methods, evaluation methods of state policy in the field of protection of intellectual rights of producers of folk handicrafts and the preservation of traditional knowledge.

This article presents results on the analysis of folk art crafts state as a sector of market economy and social stability of society in risks conditions of ethnic identity loss by globalization processes. The role of the industry in the economy of countries has been determined, as well as the most optimal mechanisms for protecting the legitimate interests of producers have been identified. Protection of traditional knowledge from distortion and favorable conditions for the development of creativity is identified also.

Recommendations on updating of international agreements in the field of preservation of traditional crafts, including protection of intellectual rights of their producers, taking into account positive experience regulation of countries practicing the use of appellations of origin.

Keywords

Ethnos Culture Traditions Folk art crafts Goods Appellation of origin Geographical indication Traditions Objects of intellectual property Globalization 

JEL code

F69 L79 O34 Z19 

References

  1. Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage, Paris, 17 October 2003. UNESCO (2003). unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000132540
  2. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at The Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, and as amended on September 28, 1979. www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=288514)
  3. Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration of October 31, 1958, as revised at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, and as amended on September 28, 1979. www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/legal_texts/lisbon_agreement.html
  4. Uruguay Round Agreement: TRIPS Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. The TRIPS Agreement is Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, signed in Marrakesh, Morocco on 15 April 1994. wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/305907
  5. WIPO. Intellectual property, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions/folklore a guide for countries in transition, Version One (2013). www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_transition_9.pdf
  6. Bromley, Iu. V.: Ethnos and ethnography, AN SSSR. The Institute of Ethnography. N.N. Miklukho-Maklai, M. Nauka (1978)Google Scholar
  7. O’Connor, B., de Bosio, G.: Economies Ius Gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice. In: van Caenegem, W., Cleary, J. (ed.) The Global Struggle Between Europe and United States Over Geographical Indications in South Korea and in the TPP. Springer, Cham. IUSGENT, vol. 58, pp. 47–79 (2017). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_3. Accessed 14 Apr 2019
  8. Hu, Z., Xiong, W., Sun, Z., Wang, S., Huang, L.: Intangible cultural heritage and geographical indication of specialty resources: a case study of Shiyan City. Agribusiness, no. 10, 77–87 (2013). https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/160723/files/18.PDF. Accessed 14 Apr 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina V. Samsonova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena V. Andreeva
    • 2
  • Anna A. Neizvestnykh
    • 3
  • Vasilii V. Skriabin
    • 3
  1. 1.Academy of Sciences of the Sakha RepublicNorth-Eastern Federal University by M. AmmosovYakutskRussia
  2. 2.North-Eastern Federal University by M. AmmosovYakutskRussia
  3. 3.Academy of Sciences of the Sakha RepublicYakutskRussia

Personalised recommendations