The Process of Engagement: Hard to Reach or Easy to Ignore?
This chapter begins by highlighting the overarching aims of our research before discussing the methodologies employed within each study. In particular, it focuses on the complexities and challenges associated with researching diversity, and more specifically with attempts to engage with, and to collect data from, groups and communities considered ‘hard to reach’. This chapter draws from the methodological dilemmas encountered during fieldwork to illustrate that it is only through developing a more nuanced, less formulaic approach to conducting research that social scientists will achieve more inclusive constructions of ‘difference’, more complete accounts of victimisation and a more comprehensive understanding of the specific issues and problems facing different communities.
KeywordsHard to reach Diverse communities Engagement Victims Qualitative Survey
- Ahn Lin, H. (2009). Race, bigotry and hate crime: Asian Americans and the construction of difference. In B. Perry (Ed.), Hate crimes volume 3: The victims of hate crime (pp. 65–84). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Bates, L. (2014). Everyday sexism. London, UK: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- End Child Poverty. (2018). More than half of children now living in poverty in some parts of the UK. Available at https://www.endchildpoverty.org.uk/more-than-half-of-children-now-living-in-poverty-in-some-parts-of-the-uk/. Accessed 22 October 2019.
- Fleetwood, J. (2009). Emotional work: Ethnographic fieldwork in prisons in Ecuador. Special Issue: Critical Issues in Researching in Hidden Communities, pp. 28–50.Google Scholar
- Friemuth, V. S., & Mettger, W. (1990). Is there a hard-to-reach audience? Public Health Reports, 105(3), 232–233.Google Scholar
- Medland, A. (2011). Portrait of the West Midlands. Office for National Statistics. London.Google Scholar
- Office for National Statistics. (2012). Ethnicity and national identity in England and Wales: 2011. Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11. Accessed 22 October 2019.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issues in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2014). Analysis: principles and processes. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 199–218). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Yeo, A., Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2014). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 177–210). London: Sage.Google Scholar