Advertisement

Calculation of Filtration Properties of the Antey Uranium Deposit Rock Massif at the Deformation Phases: Microstructural Approach

  • Stepan UstinovEmail author
  • Vladislav Petrov
  • Valery Poluektov
  • Vasily Minaev
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

The spatial and geometric parameters of various types and systems of microstructures were established, basing on the special technique of microstructural analysis, implemented by using the authors’ GIS module, in oriented rock samples of the Antey molybdenum-uranium deposit (Southeastern Transbaikalia, Russia). The sequence of activation of these microstructures was reconstructed by using additional methods for analysis of mineral substances. We investigated the fluid inclusion planes, which are microcracks that captured secondary fluid inclusions in the hydrothermal activity process, as reliable indicators of changing parameters of the stress-strain field and the identification of rock deformation phases. Thus, three successive structural phases in the history of the formation of the Antey deposit, were established. The established phases reflect the impacts of different stress-strain fields, which led to the formation of a specific set of microstructures generations that behaved as fluid-conducting channels within the hydrothermal process. The values of porosity and permeability were calculated for each identified structural phase of the deposit formation associated with certain deformations that directly influence the migration process of ore-bearing fluids.

Keywords

Special technique of microstructural analysis Antey uranium deposit Microcracks Fluid inclusion planes Deformations of rocks Stress-strain field Porosity Permeability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No.18-35-00109.

References

  1. 1.
    Cathles, L.M.: An analysis of the cooling of intrusives by ground water convection which includes boiling. Econ. Geol. 72(5), 804–826 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cathles, L.M.: Scales and effects of fluid-flow in the upper crust. Science 248, 323–329 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayba, D.O., Ingebritsen, S.E.: Multiphase groundwater flow near cooling plutons. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 12235–12252 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamanyu, S., Fujimoto, K.: On the models for the deep-seated geothermal system in the kakkonda field. Rept. Geol. Surv. Jpn. 284, 133–164 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fournier, R.O.: Hydrothermal processes related to movement of fluid from plastic into brittle rock in the magmatic-epithermal environment. Econ. Geol. 94, 1193–1211 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shmonov, V.M., Vitovtova, V.M., Zharikov, A.V.: Fluid Permeability of the Earth’s Crust Rocks. Nauchnii Mir, Moscow (2002). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roedder, E.: Fluid inclusions. Rev. Mineral. 12, 644 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuttle, O.F.: Structural petrology of planes of liquid inclusions. J. Geol. 57, 331–356 (1949)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lespinasse, M.: Are fluid inclusion planes useful in structural geology? J. Struct. Geol. 21, 1237–1243 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boullier, A.M.: Fluid inclusions: tectonic indicators. J. Struct. Geol. 21, 1229–1235 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrov, V.A., Ustinov, S.A., Poluektov, V.V., Prokofiev, V.Yu.: Reconstruction of the paths and conditions of ore-bearing hydrothermal solutions migration: the structural-geological and thermobarogeochemical approach. Vestnik RFBR 1, 27–33 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ustinov, S.A., Petrov, V.A.: Theoretical basics and opportunities of the special technique of microstructural analysis application. Uspekhi Sovrem yestestvoznaniya 10, 125–131 (2018). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lespinasse, M., Désindes, L., Fratczak, P., Petrov, V.: Microfissural mapping of natural cracks in rocks: implications for fluid transfers quantification in the crust. J. Chem. Geol. 223, 170–178 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, J., Zhao, X., Liu, B.: Digital image analysis of fluid inclusions. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 44(6), 942–947 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ustinov, S.A., Petrov, V.A.: Using of GIS-technology for microstructural analysis in geology. Geoinformatika 2, 33–46 (2015). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gueguen, Y., Dienes, J.: Transport properties of rocks from statistics and percolation. Math. Geol. 21, 1–13 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sausse, J., Jacquot, E., Fritz, B., Leroy, J., Lespinasse, M.: Evolution of crack permeability during fluid-rock interaction. Example of the Brézouard granite (Vosges, France). Tectonophysics 336(4), 199–214 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ischukova, L.P., Modnikov, I.S., Sychev, I.V., Naumov, G.B., Melnikov, I.V., Kandinov, M.N.: Uranium Deposits of the Streltsovsky Ore Field in Transbaikalia. Glazovskaya Printing House, Irkutsk (2007). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andreeva, O.V., Aleshin, A.P., Golovin, V.A.: Vertical zoning of near-ore transformations at the uranium deposit Antey-Streltsovskoe (Eastern Transbaikalia, Russia). In: Geologiya Rudnykh Mestorozhdeniy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 396–411 (1996). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrov, V.A., Poluektov, V.V., Rebetsky, Y.L., Burmistrov, A.A.: Tectonophysics of hydrothermal ore formation: an example of the Antei Mo–U deposit. Transbaikalia. Geol. Ore Depos. 57(4), 292–312 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations