Fresh Approaches to Practice, Skills, Competence and Expertise
This book has demonstrated how complexity thinking, in particular, the concept of emergence, sheds new light on central aspects of human performances. In the previous chapter, this took the form of a co-constitutive account of agency and learning. This concluding chapter builds on this to provide new accounts of practice; skills and competence (and four other associated concepts); and, finally, expertise. In progressing this analysis, the shape of this chapter is as follows. We argue that affectively impelled ‘holistic practical judgements’, embedded in co-present groups, provide novel accounts of practices (Sect. 10.1), and of skills and competence (and other related concepts) (Sect. 10.2). Whilst we acknowledge that reductive or atomised analyses of these are popular and sometimes helpful, we dispute the utility of many of the outcomes of these. Too often they tend to obliterate the integrity of the very performance that is supposedly being valued. Next, because we regard all of these phenomena as normative activities, we provide a novel account of expertise, understood as highly skilled, highly competent practice, manifesting intellectual and other virtues (Sect. 10.3). Finally (Sect. 10.4), we offer some reflections on the emergent process involved in producing this book and, more widely, on the social science implications of complexity thinking’s theoretical perspectives.
- Addis, M., & Winch, C. (Eds.). (2017). Introduction (Special issue on Education and expertise). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12250.
- Aristotle. (1941 version). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance (OECD Education Working Paper No. 71). Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2012)8&docLanguage=En. Accessed April 30, 2018.
- Buranyi, S. (2018, March 4). Dehumanising, impenetrable, frustrating: The grim reality of job hunting in the age of AI. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/au.
- Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hager, P. (2012). Theories of practice and their connections with learning: A continuum of more and less inclusive accounts. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (Professional and Practice-Based Learning Book Series) (Vol. 8, pp. 17–32). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kemmis, S. (2010). What is professional practice? Recognising and respecting diversity in understandings of practice. In C. Kanes (Ed.), Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory (pp. 139–165). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London & New York: Routledge (Original work published 1945).Google Scholar
- Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). (2010). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- O’Toole, J., & Beckett, D. (2013). Educational research: Creative thinking and doing (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Passmore, J. (1980). The philosophy of teaching. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Programme for International Student Assessment. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment. Accessed March 6, 2018.
- Ravilious, K. (2017, July 1). Find the flow. New Scientist, 33–35.Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- The Virtues Project. (n.d.). www.virtuesproject.com/virtues.html. Accessed April 30, 2018.
- Winch, C. (2010). Dimensions of expertise: A conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar