Introduction: A Relational Sociology of Morality in Practice

  • Owen AbbottEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology book series (PSRS)


In this introductory chapter, Abbott highlights the commonalities between the relational sociology critiques of dualistic and static thinking in social theory on the one hand, and the recent philosophic critiques of the problematic reliance of Enlightenment moral thought on universalism, rationalism, and the disembedded subject on the other. This, Abbott argues, indicates the necessity of a relational sociology of morality. Specifically, the work of the likes of MacIntyre, Gilligan, and Dreyfus, along with a resurgent body of research conducted within the ‘new’ sociology of morality, point towards viewing morality in terms of practice, including everyday practice, and thus calls for a relational sociology of morality in practice.


  1. Aboulafia, M. (1999). A (Neo) American in Paris: Bourdieu, Mead, and Pragmatism. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (pp. 153–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, B. (2000). Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action (1st ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2005). Consuming Ethics: Articulating the Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption. Antipode, 37(1), 23–45. Scholar
  4. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bottero, W. (2009). Relationality and Social Interaction. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(2), 399–420. Scholar
  6. Burkitt, I. (2008). Social Selves: Theories of Self and Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Christman, J. (2014). Relational Autonomy and the Social Dynamics of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(3), 369–382. Retrieved from JSTOR.Google Scholar
  8. Crossley, N. (2006). Reflexive Embodiment in Contemporary Society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crossley, N. (2011). Towards Relational Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The Relational Subject. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H. L. (2014). Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action (M. R. Wrathall, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Elias, N. (1991). The Society of Individuals (Reissue ed.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. Scholar
  14. Fritzson, F.-A. (2018). Subjectivism and Relational Good. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(2), 359–370. Scholar
  15. Gergen, K. J. (2011). From Moral Autonomy to Relational Responsibility. Journal of Religion and Science, 46(1), 204–223.Google Scholar
  16. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1995). Individuation Through Socialization: On George Herbert Mead’s Theory of Subjectivity. In Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays (pp. 149–205). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hekman, S. (1995). Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hilbert, R. (2009). Ethnomethodology and Social Theory. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 159–178). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). Back to the Future. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (pp. 3–14).
  21. Holdsworth, C., & Morgan, D. (2007). Revisiting the Generalized Other: An Exploration. Sociology, 41(3), 401–417. Scholar
  22. Ignatow, G. (2009). Why the Sociology of Morality Needs Bourdieu’s Habitus. Sociological Inquiry, 79(1), 98–114. Scholar
  23. Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luckmann, T. (2002). Moral Communication in Modern Societies. Human Studies, 25(1), 19–32. Scholar
  25. MacIntyre, A. (1985). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  26. May, V. (2008). On Being a ‘Good’ Mother: The Moral Presentation of Self in Written Life Stories. Sociology, 42(3), 470–486. Scholar
  27. May, V. (2013). Connecting Self to Society: Belonging in a Changing World. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  28. McNay, L. (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of A Social Behaviorist: 1 (C. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Powell, C., & Dépelteau, F. (2013). Introduction. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues (pp. 1–12).
  31. Sayer, A. (2005). The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (1998). Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 193–209. Scholar
  33. Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family Fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, B. (1973). Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations