Advertisement

Epilogue: What Have We Learned?

  • Thomas J. MiceliEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the conclusions from the prior chapters and weaves them into a coherent economic perspective on the goals and effects of criminal punishment. The discussion not only emphasizes the ability of economic theory to describe the structure and function of legal institutions as well as the decisions of rational offenders, but also cautions that an economic approach to criminal justice is dependent on the values that a given society seeks to pursue, which is ultimately a question of philosophy and politics.

References

  1. Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elster, Jon. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, Lawrence. 2004. Law in America: A Short History. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  4. Gennaioli, Nicola, and Andrei Shleifer. 2007. The Evolution of the Common Law. Journal of Political Economy 115: 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2013. David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  6. Harel, Alon. 2012. Economic Analysis of Criminal Law: A Survey. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Criminal Law, ed. Alon Harel and Keith Hylton. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1881 [1963]. The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  8. Posner, Richard. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
  9. Priest, George. 1977. The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. The Journal of Legal Studies 6: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rubin, Paul. 1977. Why Is the Common Law Efficient? The Journal of Legal Studies 6: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ryan, Scott. 2010. Inter-Judge Disparity After Booker: A First Look. Stanford Law Review 63: 1–66.Google Scholar
  12. Vitiello, Michael. 2004. Reforming Three-Strikes Excesses. Washington University Law Quarterly 82: 1–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrs MansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations