The Limits of Punishment: Of Angels and Bad Men

  • Thomas J. MiceliEmail author


The chapter explores the limits of criminal punishment as a means of regulating conduct by introducing the role of law in communicating unacceptable behaviors to members of society. This “expressive function” of law can expand the reach of law if least some members of the population are responsive to the idea that disobeying the law is itself wrong or immoral, regardless of the consequences. The chapter examines the implications of this moral dimension of law for the optimal scope of rulemaking and the structure of punishments. It turns out that an increase in the fraction of reflexive law-abiders may make it desirable to expand or contract the scope of law; that is, morality can either be a complement or substitute for the threat of punishment.


  1. Andrews, E., and F. Andrews. 1974. Work and Worship Among the Shakers: Their Craftsmanship and Economic Order. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, James. 1965. Ethical Values, Expected Values, and Large Numbers. Ethics 76: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Budiansky, Stephen. 2019. Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Cooter, Robert. 1998. Expressive Law and Economics. The Journal of Legal Studies 27: 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2005. The Confluence of Justice and Efficiency in the Economic Analysis of Law. In The Origins of Law and Economics: Essays of the Founding Fathers, ed. F. Parisi and C. Rowley. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2006. The Intrinsic Value of Obeying a Law: Economic Analysis of the Internal Viewpoint. Fordham Law Review 75: 1275–1285.Google Scholar
  8. Coşgel, Metin, and Thomas J. Miceli. 2009. State and Religion. Journal of Comparative Economics 37: 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2019. Toward a Theory of Religious Belief and the Emergence of Law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. Dharmapala, Dhammika, and Richard McAdams. 2003. The Condorcet Jury Theorem and the Expressive Function of Law: A Theory of Informative Law. American Law and Economics Review 5: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etzioni, Amitai. 1999. Back to the Pillory? The American Scholar 68: 43–50.Google Scholar
  12. Frank, Robert. 1987. If Homo Economicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience? American Economic Review 77: 593–604.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1990. A Theory of Moral Sentiments. In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. J. Mansbridge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, David. 2000. Law’s Order: What Economics Has to Do with the Law and Why It Matters. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1982. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1973. Law and Legislation: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1881 [1963]. The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1897. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review 10: 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iannaccone, L., R. Finke, and R. Stark. 1997. Deregulating Religion: The Economics of Church and State. Economic Inquiry 35: 350–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, Dominic. 2005. God’s Punishment and Public Goods: A Test of the Supernatural Punishment Hypothesis in 186 World Cultures. Human Nature 16: 410–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2016. God Is Watching You: How the Fear of God Makes Us Human. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kahan, Dan. 1998. Social Meaning and the Economic Analysis of Crime. The Journal of Legal Studies 27: 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz, Leo. 1987. Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewin, Jeff, and William Trumbull. 1990. The Social Value of Crime? International Review of Law and Economics 10: 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madison, James. 2008. The Federalist, 51. In The Federalist Papers, ed. L. Goldman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mungan, Murat. 2012. The Scope of Criminal Law. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Criminal Law, ed. A. Harel and K. Hylton. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Norenzayan, A. 2013. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Parisi, Francesco, and Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci. 2004. The Rise and Fall of Communal Liability in Ancient Law. International Review of Law and Economics 24: 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Polinsky, A. Mitchell, and Steven Shavell. 2007. The Theory of Public Law Enforcement. In Handbook of Law and Economics, ed. A.M. Polinsky and S. Shavell, vol. I. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  33. Posner, Richard. 1983. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shavell, Steven. 2002. Law Versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct. American Law and Economics Review 4: 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, Adam. 1759 [1976]. A Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stark, Rodney. 2007. Discovering God: The Origins of the Great Religions and the Evolution of Belief. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  39. Sunstein, Cass. 1996. On the Expressive Function of Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 2021–2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wade, Nicholas. 2009. The Faith Instinct: How Religion Evolved and Why It Endures. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, Max. 1930 [2003]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  42. White, Mark. 2018. The Neglected Nuance of Beccaria’s Theory of Punishment. European Journal of Law and Economics 46: 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrs MansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations