Advertisement

Repeat Offenders: Marginal Deterrence and Redemption

  • Thomas J. MiceliEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter extends the economic model of crime to include a dynamic element—given the reality that many criminals are repeat offenders. Several new issues arise in this context, including marginal deterrence, the possibility of redemption (or rehabilitation) of offenders, whether or not an offender’s criminal record should be considered in setting punishment for a current crime, and the role of prison in incapacitating dangerous repeat offenders. The parable of the Prodigal Son from the New Testament serves as a thematic point of departure for much of the discussion.

References

  1. Agan, Amanda, and Sonia Starr. 2017. The Effect of Criminal Records on Access to Employment. American Economic Review 107: 560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baik, K., and I. Kim. 2001. Optimal Punishment When Individuals May Learn Deviant Values. International Review of Law and Economics 21: 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, Cyrus, Sheng-Cheng Hu, and Ting-Yuan Huang. 2000. Punishing Repeat Offenders More Severely. International Review of Law and Economics 20: 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooter, Robert. 1984. Prices and Sanctions. Columbia Law Review 84: 1523–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coşgel, Metin, and Thomas J. Miceli. 2018. The Price of Redemption: Sin Penance, and Marginal Deterrence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 156: 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrman, B. 2018. The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Ekelund, R., and R. Tollison. 2011. The Economic Origins of Roman Christianity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, David, and William Sjostrom. 1993. Hanged for a Sheep: The Economics of Marginal Deterrence. The Journal of Legal Studies 22: 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friehe, Tim, and Thomas J. Miceli. 2014. Marginal Deterrence When Offenders Act Sequentially. Economics Letters 124: 523–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funk, P. 2004. On the Effective Use of Stigma as a Crime-Deterrent. European Economic Review 48: 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, H.L.A. 1982. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hylton, Keith. 2005. The Theory of Criminal Penalties and the Economics of Criminal Law. Review of Law and Economics 1: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lott, John. 1992. Do We Punish High-Income Criminals Too Heavily? Economic Inquiry 30: 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCannon, Bryan. 2009. Differentiating Between First and Repeat Offenders. Contemporary Economic Policy 27: 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miceli, Thomas. 2010. A Model of Criminal Sanctions that Incorporates Both Deterrence and Incapacitation. Economics Letters 107: 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. Escalating Penalties for Repeat Offenders: Why Are They So Hard to Explain? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 169: 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miceli, Thomas, and Catherine Bucci. 2005. A Simple Theory of Increasing Penalties for Repeat Offenders. Review of Law and Economics 1: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mungan, Murat. 2010. Repeat Offenders: If They Learn, We Punish Them More Severely. International Review of Law and Economics 30: 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Polinsky, A. Mitchell, and Daniel Rubinfeld. 1991. A Model of Optimal Fines for Repeat Offenders. Journal of Public Economics 46: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Posner, Richard. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, Eric. 1996. Stigma and Self-Fulfilling Expectations of Criminality. Journal of Law and Economics 39: 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shavell, Steven. 1992. A Note on Marginal Deterrence. International Review of Law and Economics 12: 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2015. A Simple Model of Optimal Deterrence and Incapacitation. International Review of Law and Economics 42: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stark, Rodney. 1996. The Rise of Christianity. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2007. Discovering God: The Origins of the Great Religions and the Evolution of Belief. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, George. 1970. The Optimum Enforcement of Laws. Journal of Political Economy 78: 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stigler, George, and Gary Becker. 1977. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar
  30. Waldfogel, Joel. 1994. The Effect of Criminal Conviction on Income and the Trust ‘Reposed in the Workmen’. Journal of Human Resources 29: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilde, Louis. 1992. Criminal Choice, Nonmonetary Sanctions, and Marginal Deterrence. International Review of Law and Economics 12: 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrs MansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations