Advertisement

Risk Assessment of Power Transformer in Thailand’s Distribution Grid

  • Thanapong SuwanasriEmail author
  • Suphon Kumpalavalee
  • Cattareeya Suwanasri
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 598)

Abstract

Once power transformer has been installed in service, it is degraded by thermal, electrical and mechanical stresses. To upkeep its condition and prevent catastrophic consequences from its failure the preventive and condition-based maintenances should be applied appropriately. The appropriate maintenances are considered based on power transformer usage risk, which is evaluated from present condition and importance of power transformer. To determine the present condition, the health index of power transformer and its components are at first determined by scoring the test results of visual inspection, electrical and insulating oil tests. Then, the obtained scores and weights, which were determined by applying the analytical hierarchy process to brainstorm the utility’s expertise, were further calculated as component and overall health index of power transformer. Moreover, the major concerns of power transformer usage, such as loading percentage, load importance, redundancy, system fault level, number of through fault per year, transformer age, operation and maintenance satisfaction, are evaluated as importance index of power transformer by scoring and weighting technique. Then, the health and importance indices are coherently considered to access power transformer usage risk displayed on risk matrix. The aforementioned procedures were developed in Microsoft Excel to access 67 transformer’s usage risks in Thailand’s distribution grid. The software was developed to display the result as traffic light color as red, yellow and green for high, moderate and low usage risk respectively. The obtained risk are used to manage maintenance strategies and proper usage of power transformer according to its condition and usage risk.

Keywords

Condition Maintenance strategy Power transformer Usage risk 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Research Division, Substation Maintenance Division and Transformer Division of the Provincial Electricity Authority of Thailand (PEA) for technical support and funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Muhr, M.: Asset and risk management of electrical power equipment. In: International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials, Kitakyushu, Japan (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muhr, M.: Aging and degradation, their detection and monitoring & asset management. In: International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Material, Mie, Japan (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muhr M., Sumereder, C.: Applying risk management for high voltage equipment. In: IEEE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application, China (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arshad, M., Islam, S., Khaliq, A.: Power transformer asset management. In: International Conference on Power System Technology POWERCON, Singapore (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dominelli, N.: Equipment health rating of power transformers. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CIGRE WG A2.34. Guide-for-Transformer-Maintenance (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE 62-1995. Guide for Diagnostic Field Testing of Electric Power Apparatus (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gradnik, M.K.: Physical-chemical oil test monitoring and diagnostic of oil-filled transformers. In: Proceeding of 14 International Conference on Dielectric Liquids, Graz, Austria (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    IEC 60422-2013. Mineral Insulating Oils in Electrical Equipment - Supervision and Maintenance Guidance (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CIGRE WG B3.06. IT Strategies for Asset Management of Substations - General Principles (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    CIGRE WG 37.27. Ageing of The System Impact on Planning (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CIGRE WG A2.18. Life Management Techniques for Power Transformers (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CIGRE WG A2.20. Guide on Economics of Transformer Management (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanaka, H., Tsukao, S., Yamashita, D.: Multiple criteria assessment of substation conditions by pair-wise comparison of analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25(4), 3017–3023 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanapong Suwanasri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suphon Kumpalavalee
    • 1
  • Cattareeya Suwanasri
    • 1
  1. 1.King Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations