Advertisement

Non-linear Dynamic Response of a Ground Rod in Resistive Soils

  • R. R. DiazEmail author
  • J. N. Silva
  • A. Parellada
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 598)

Abstract

The increasing use of intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) in substations, for supervisory control and data acquisition in power systems, makes critical the understanding of transients in grounding electrodes under lightning surges. Thus, acquiring greater knowledge of the dynamic response of grounding systems becomes strategic. The flow of high currents in earthed electrodes can produce high electric fields and the consequent ionization of the soil. The non-linear conduction mechanism in the soil provokes a time-dependent reduction of the impulse resistance. This reduction may be very pronounced for several tens of microseconds and the effect can be advantageous for the insulation coordination with soils of high resistivity, eventually limiting the harmful inductive behaviour depending on frequency.

Previous experimental work and computer simulation in a laboratory scale model, with a single soil resistivity value, demonstrated the importance of the energy injected for the ionization of the soil around the earthed electrode. A simplified physical model of the discharge progression in soils was proposed in order to explain the relationship between energy and transient grounding resistance. The model included waveform, peak value and rise time of the injected current. Extending the proposed method, this contribution presents and analyzes new experimental results obtained for several values of soil resistivity, between 290 and 3800 Ωm. Finally, from the experimental results obtained with this approach, a simple and practical procedure is proposed to estimate transient resistance reduction in actual vertical ground rods buried in soils having a different resistivity.

Keywords

Soil ionization Ground rod Transient resistance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of CONICET (the National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina).

References

  1. 1.
    Bellaschi, P.L., Armington, R.E., Snowden, A.E.: Impulse and 60-cycle characteristics of driven grounds - part 11. AIEE Trans. 61, 349–363 (1942)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liew, A.C., Darveniza, M.: Dynamic model of impulse characteristics of concentrated earths. Proc. IEE 121, 123–135 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oettle, E.E.: A new general estimation curve for predicting the impulse impedance of concentrated earth electrodes. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 3, 2020–2029 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mousa, A.M.: The soil ionization gradient associated with discharge of high currents into concentrated electrodes. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 9, 1669–1677 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espel, P., Diaz, R., Bonamy, A., Silva, J.: Electrical parameters associated with discharges in resistive soils. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 19, 1174–1182 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nor, N., Haddad, A., Griffiths, H.: Determination of threshold electric field Ec of soil under high impulse currents. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 20, 2108–2113 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nor, N., Ramli, A.: Soil characteristics of wet sand under different impulse polarity and earth electrode’s dimensions. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 15, 910–914 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cigre WG 33.01: Guide to procedures for estimating the lightning performance of transmission lines. Tech. Broch. Nr. 63, Paris (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coelho, V., et al.: Soil resistivity behaviour under high current density values using the energy balance method. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lightning Protection, XIII SIPDA, pp. 129–136, Brazil (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Habjanic, A., Trlep, M.: The simulation of the soil ionization phenomenon around the grounding system by the finite element method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 867–970 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salari, J.C., Portela, C.: Grounding systems modeling including soil ionization. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 23, 1939–1945 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sekioka, S.: Frequency and time-dependent grounding resistance model for lightning surge analysis. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 61(2), 419–425 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Theethayi, N., Thottappillil, R., Paolone, M., Nucci, C., Rachidi, F.: External impedance and admittance of buried horizontal wires for transient studies. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 14, 751–761 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourg, S., Sacepe, B., Debu, T.: Deep earth electrodes in highly resistive ground. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 584–589, USA (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diaz, R., Silva, J.: Experimental results on non-linear behaviour of grounding systems submitted to impulse currents. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lightning Protection, VIII SIPDA, pp. 551–555, Brazil (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diaz, R., Silva, J.: Energy injection effect on transient grounding resistance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on High-Voltage Engineering, pp. 1763–1768, Johannesburg (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diaz, R., Silva, J.: Space charge and soil ionization: an electro-kinetic approach. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 18(6), 2032–2039 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DC Current Flow Package. https://www.quickfield.com/cflow.htm. Downloaded 11 Dec 2018
  19. 19.
    IEEE Std. 80: Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding, USA (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of TucumanSan Miguel de TucumánArgentina
  2. 2.CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations