Advertisement

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay with Slow Scintillator

  • Jack DungerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

A strength of water Cherenkov detectors is that the direction, quantity and isotropy of Cherenkov radiation produced in physics events encodes information about the type and direction of the particle(s) that produced it. In particular, solar neutrino events which produce electrons may be identified using the angle the electron subtends with the solar direction. If a 0\(\nu \beta \beta \) search was performed in a water Cherenkov detector, this technique could be used to reduce the \(^{8}\)B \(\nu \) ES background that limits the sensitivity of SNO+. Moreover, if the directionality and energy split of the two electrons emitted in 0\(\nu \beta \beta \) could be estimated from their Cherenkov signals, this information could be used to determine the underlying 0\(\nu \beta \beta \) mechanism. However, the relatively modest Cherenkov yield prohibits a \(^{130}\)Te 0\(\nu \beta \beta \) search in water: the \(\mathcal {O}\)(1 MeV) events of interest are poorly reconstructed or below detector threshold altogether in modern water Cherenkov detectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso JR et al (2014) Advanced scintillator detector concept (ASDC): a concept paper on the physics potential of water-based liquid scintillator. arXiv:1409.5864
  2. 2.
    Biller S (2017) Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright A (2017) Te Dev R&D pre-summary. SNO+-docDB 4545-v1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mastbaum A, Barros N, Coulter I, Kaptanoglu T, Segui L (2016) Optics overview and proposed changes to RAT. SNO+-docDB 3461 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaptanoglu T (2017) Characterization of the Hamamatsu 8 R5912-MOD photomultiplier tube. arXiv:1710.03334
  6. 6.
    Klein J (2018) Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang W et al (2015) Performance of the 8-in. R5912 photomultiplier tube with super bialkali photocathode. J Instrum 10(08):T08001. http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/10/i=08/a=T08001
  8. 8.
    Biller SD et al (1999) Measurements of photomultiplier single photon counting efficiency for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A: Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 432(2):364–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00500-8
  9. 9.
    Zhi Y, Liang Y, Wang Z, Chen S (2017) Wide field-of-view and high-efficiency light concentrator. arXiv:1703.07527
  10. 10.
    Boger J et al (2000) The Sudbury neutrino observatory. Nucl Instrum Meth 449:172–207Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akashi-Ronquest M et al (2015) Improving photoelectron counting and particle identification in scintillation detectors with Bayesian techniques. Astropart Phys 65:40–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.12.006, arXiv:1408.1914
  12. 12.
    Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tretyak VI, Zdesenko YuG (1995) Tables of double beta decay data. At Data Nucl Data Tables 61(1):43–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(95)90011-X

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Merantix AGBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations