Advertisement

Develop a GIS-Based Context-Aware Sensors Network Deployment Algorithm to Optimize Sensor Coverage in an Urban Area

  • Meysam ArganyEmail author
  • Mir-Abolfazl Mostafavi
Conference paper
First Online:
  • 122 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

Adequate coverage is an important issue in geosensor networks in order to fulfill the sensing applications in urban areas. GIS as well as optimization methods are widely used to distribute geosensors in the network to achieve the desired level of coverage. Most of the algorithms applied in urban domain suffer from the lack of considering real environmental information. In this paper, the problem of placing sensors to get optimum coverage is studied by investigating the concept of urban contextual information in sensor network. Then a local GIS-based context-aware framework of sensor network deployment optimization method is introduced. Obtained results of our algorithm under different working conditions and applications show the effectiveness of our approach.

Keywords

Sensor network Deployment Optimization Context-aware Urban area 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Nittel S (2009) A survey of geosensor networks: advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors (Basel) 9(7):5664–5678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lewis FL (2004) Wireless sensor networks. Smart Environ Technol Protoc Appl 1–18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghosh A, Das SK (2008) Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Pervasive Mob Comput 4(3):303–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghosh A (2004) Estimating coverage holes and enhancing coverage in mixed sensor networks. In: 29th annual IEEE international conference on local computer networks, pp 68–76Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thai MT, Wang F, Du DH, Jia X (2008) Coverage problems in wireless sensor networks: designs and analysis. Int J Sens Netw 3(3):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li BM, Li Z, Vasilakos AV (2013) A survey on topology control in wireless sensor networks: taxonomy, comparative study, and open issues, vol 101, no 12Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aziz N, Aziz K, Ismail W (2009) Coverage strategies for wireless sensor networks. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 50:145–150Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmed N, Kanhere S, Jha S (2005) The holes problem in wireless sensor networks: a survey. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev 1(2):1–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang C, Tseng Y (2005) A survey of solutions to the coverage problems in wireless sensor networks. J Internet Technol 1:1–9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adriaens J, Megerian S, Potkonjak M (2006) Optimal worst-case coverage of directional field-of-view sensor networks. In: 2006 3rd annual IEEE communications society on sensor and ad hoc communications and networks, pp 336–345Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akbarzadeh V, Gagne C, Parizeau M, Argany M, Mostafavi MA (2013) Probabilistic sensing model for sensor placement optimization based on line-of-sight coverage. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 62(2):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Argany M, Mostafavi MA, Karimipour F, Gagné C (2011) A GIS based wireless sensor network coverage estimation and optimization: a Voronoi approach. Trans Comput Sci XIV 6970:151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paul AK, Sato T (2017) Localization in wireless sensor networks: a survey on algorithms, measurement techniques, applications and challenges. J Sens Actuator Netw 6(4)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun JZ, Sauvola J (2002) Towards a conceptual model for context-aware adaptive services. In: Proceedings of 8th international scientific and practical conference of students, post-graduates and young scientists modern technique and technologies MTT’2002 (Cat. No.02EX550), pp 90–94Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park S, Savvides A, Srivastava M (2000) SensorSim: a simulation framework for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, pp 104–111Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahfouz AMA, Hancke GP (2018) Localised information fusion techniques for location discovery in wireless sensor networks. Int J Sens Netw 26(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shit RC, Sharma S, Puthal D, Zomaya AY (2018) Location of Things (LoT): a review and taxonomy of sensors localization in IoT infrastructure. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 20(3):2028–2061Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bharathi Priya C, Sivakumar S (2018) A survey on localization techniques in wireless sensor networks. Int J Eng Technol 7(1.3):125Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karimipour F, Argany M, Mostafavi MA (2014) Spatial coverage estimation and optimization in geosensor networks deployment. In: Ibrahiem MM, Ramakrishnan S (eds) Wireless sensor networks, from theory to applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp 59–83Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fan G, Jin S (2010) Coverage problem in wireless sensor network: a survey. J Netw 5(9):1033–1040Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Argany M, Mostafavi MA, Akbarzadeh V, Gagne C, Yaagoubi R (2012) Impact of the quality of spatial 3D city models on sensor networks. Geomatica 66(4):291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of GeographyUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Forestry, Geography, and GeomaticsLaval UniversityQuebec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options