Government Control of the Cyber Economy Based on the Technologies of Industry 4.0

  • Mikhail A. Kovazhenkov
  • Gilyan V. Fedotova
  • Ruslan H. Ilyasov
  • Yury A. Nikitin
  • Natalia E. Buletova
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


Purpose: The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of government tools to manage the current digitization of Russian society. We analyze the specific measures that are implemented in a number of countries for the market subjects of digital tools and analyze the existing normative documents on the implementation of the philosophy of Industry 4.0 in Russia.

Government control of the transition to the cyber economy is impossible without a normative and legal basis for the interactions in this sphere. In this chapter, the authors focus on the list of adopted documents, purposes and tasks of implementation, and the indicators of target planning on informatization.

An adequately selected list of target indicators will determine future government policy for the process of informatization in all spheres of the national economy. The indicators for government measures that are set at the planning stage should correspond with the final results.

Methodology: The following methods are used: comparative analysis of data, dynamic assessment, comparison, analogy, and systematization.

Results: Through the study of the main normative and legal documents of government control that determine the possibilities and potential directions for the informatization of the Russian economic system an assessment of the achieved results of informatization in certain spheres of the socioeconomic environment is performed. The main target indicators for digitization and the future landscape of the Russian cyber economy are considered; achievements in the transition to Industry 4.0 are studied; and conclusions on the possible successes in various spheres of public and economic life in Russia are made.

Recommendations: The current tools for government control over the processes for the informatization of Russian society should be reconsidered in respect to certain tasks and target indicators for the future transition to full digitization of all spheres of the national economy.


Cyber economy Government Normative acts Industry 4.0 Information society 

JEL Code

F01 O11 O14 057 



The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-010-00103 A.


  1. Fedotova GV, Kulikova NN, Perekrestova LV, Kozenko YА (2018) Target indicators of implementing the measures on formation of the model of information economy. In: Sukhodolov AP (ed) Models of modern information economy: conceptual contradictions and practical examples. Emerald Publishing Limited, London, pp 255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kovazhenkov МА, Fedotova GV, Kurbanov TK, Uchurova EO, Tserenova BI (2018) Verification of state programs of geographically-distributed economic systems. In: Popkova EG (ed) The future of the global financial system: downfall or harmony: [materials of conference (Limassol, Cyprus, April 13–14, 2018)], Lecture notes in networks and systems, vol 57. Springer, Cham, pp 1043–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kravets AG, Gurtjakov AS, Darmanian AP (2013) Enterprise intellectual capital management by social learning environment implementation. World Appl Sci J 23(7):956–964Google Scholar
  4. Kuznetsov SY, Tereliansky PV, Shuvaev AV, Natsubize AS, Vasilyev IA (2016) Analysis of innovate solutions based on combinatorial approaches. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11(17):10222–10230Google Scholar
  5. Plotnokov V, Fedotova GV, Popkova EG, Kastyrina AA (2015) Harmonization of strategic planning indicators of territories’ socioeconomic growth. Reg Sect Econ Stud 15-2:105–114Google Scholar
  6. Popova L, Litvinova T, Ioda E, Suleimanova L, Chirkina M (2015) Perspectives of the growth of economic security by clustering of small innovative enterprises. Eur Res Stud J 18(Special Issue):163–172Google Scholar
  7. Romanova TF, Andreeva OV, Meliksetyan SN, Otrishko MO (2017) Increasing of cost efficiency as a trend of public law entities’ activity intensification in a public administration sector. Eur Res Stud J 20(1):155–161Google Scholar
  8. Sibirskaya EV, Shestaeva KA (2016) The contents of innovative in the Russian economy. In: Paweł L, Tomasz R (eds) Knowledge-economy-society: contemporary aspects of economic transformation. Cracow University of Economics, Krakow, Poland, pp 27–37Google Scholar
  9. Sukhodolov AP, Popkova EG, Kuzlaeva IM (2018) Internet economy: existence from the point of view of micro-economic aspect. Stud Comput Intell 714:11–21Google Scholar
  10. Vertakova Y, Plotnikov V, Fedotova G (2016) The system of indicators for indicative management of a region and its clusters. Procedia Econ Financ 39:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikhail A. Kovazhenkov
    • 1
  • Gilyan V. Fedotova
    • 2
  • Ruslan H. Ilyasov
    • 3
  • Yury A. Nikitin
    • 4
  • Natalia E. Buletova
    • 5
  1. 1.Volgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia
  2. 2.Volga Region Research Institute of Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy ProductsVolgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia
  3. 3.Chechen State UniversityGroznyRussia
  4. 4.General A.V. Khrulev Military Academy of Material and Technical ProvisionSt. PetersburgRussian Federation
  5. 5.Volgograd Institute of Management the Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations