Advertisement

Surface Topography and Its Functional Importance

  • Pawel PawlusEmail author
  • Andrzej Dzierwa
  • Agnieszka Lenart
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

The 2D profile was analysed earlier. Standards ISO 4287 and ISO 11562 define the roughness profile, waviness profile, the primary profile and their parameters. The mean line is determined by fitting a least squares line through the profile. The roughness profile is derived from the primary profile by retaining the short-wave component. The waviness profile contains long wavelengths.

References

  1. 1.
    E.J. Abbott, F.A. Firestone, Specifying surface quality—a method based on accurate measurement and comparison. Mech. Eng. 55, 569–572 (1933)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Burstein, D. Ingman, Pore ensemble statistics in application to lubrication under reciprocating motion. Tribol. Trans. 43(2), 205–212 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402000008982330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Campbell, Cylinder bore surface roughness in internal combustion engines: its appreciation and control. Wear 19, 163–166 (1972).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(72)90302-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.R. Chang, I. Etsion, D.B. Bogy, An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J. Tribol. Trans. ASME 109, 257–263 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3261348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Chengwei, Z. Linqing, A general expression for plasticity index. Wear 121, 161–172 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(88),90040-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. Cohen, Y. Kligerman, I. Etsion, A model for contact and static friction of nominally flat rough surfaces under full stick contact condition. J. Tribol. Trans. ASME 130(3), 031401 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2908925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimkovski Z (2011) Surfaces of honed cylinder liners. PhD Dissertation, Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Dzierwa, P. Pawlus, W. Zelasko et al., The study of the tribological properties of one-process and two-process surfaces after vapour blasting and lapping using pin-on-disc tester. Key Eng. Mater. 527, 217–222 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.527.217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Etsion, Improving tribological performance of mechanical components by laser surface texturing. Tribol. Lett. 17(4), 733–737 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-004-8081-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Etsion, State of the art in laser surface texturing, in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces, Rzeszow, Poland, 08–10 July 2009Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Galda, A. Dzierwa, J. Sep et al., The effect of oil pockets shape and distribution on seizure resistance in lubricated sliding. Tribol. Lett. 37(2), 301–311 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9522-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Grabon, P. Pawlus, J. Sep, Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribol. Int. 43, 1882–1892 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Greenwood, A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261, 191–200 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.09.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.A. Greenwood, J.H. Tripp, The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 185, 625–633 (1970).  https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1970_185_069_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A 295, 300–319 (1966).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.0242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Hirst, A.E. Hollander, Surface finish and damage in sliding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 337A, 379–394 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.M. Hsu, Y. Jing, F. Zhao, Self-adaptive surface texture design for friction reduction across the lubrication regimes. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 4(1), 014004 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672x/4/1/014004Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Hu, L. Hu, Q. Ding, The effect of laser texturing on the tribological behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 226, 854–863 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650112450801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.L. Jackson, I. Green, A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J. Tribol. 127, 343–354 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1866166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.L. Jackson, I. Green, A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol. Int. 39, 906–914 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Jeng, Impact of plateaued surfaces on tribological performance. Tribol. Trans. 39, 354–361 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009608983538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Kogut, I. Etsion, Elastic-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. J. Appl. Mech. 69, 657–662 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1490373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Kogut, T. Etsion, A finite element based elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. Tribol. Trans. 46, 383–390 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402000308982641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Koka, T. Pitchford, M. Jesh et al., Studies on head-disc contact increase during contact start/stop and continuous drag testing of thin film disc. Tribol. Trans. 36(1), 1–10 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009308983125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Koszela, L. Galda, A. Dzierwa et al., The effect of surface texturing on seizure resistance of a steel-bronze assembly. Tribol. Int. 43, 1933–1942 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Koszela, P. Pawlus, R. Reizer et al., The combined effect of surface texturing and DLC coating on the functional properties of internal combustion engines. Tribol. Int. 127, 470–477 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.06.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O. Kovalchenko, A. Ajayi, A. Erdemir et al., The effect of laser surface texturing on transitions in lubrication regimes during unidirectional sliding contact. Tribol. Int. 38, 219–225 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2004.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Z. Krzyzak, P. Pawlus, ‘Zero-wear’ of piston skirt surface topography. Wear 260, 554–561 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.03.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S.E. Leefe, “Bi-Gaussian” representation of worn surface topography in elastic contact problems, in Tribology for Energy Conservation, ed. by D. Dowson, et al. (Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 1998), pp. 281–290Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Z. Ma, N.E. Henein, W. Bryzik et al., Break-in liner wear and piston ring assembly friction in a spark–ignited engine. Tribol. Trans. 41, 497–504 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402009808983774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Masouros, A. Dimarogonas, K. Lefas, A model for wear and surface roughness transients during the running-in of bearings. Wear 45, 375–383 (1977).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(77)90028-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    B.B. Mihic, Thermal contact conductance: theoretical considerations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 17, 205–214 (1974).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(74),90082-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S.P. Mishra, A.A. Polycarpou, Tribological studies of unpolished laser surface textures under starved lubrication conditions for use in air-conditioning and refrigeration compressors. Tribol. Int. 44(12), 1890–1901 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Nakano, M. Korenaga, K. Miyake et al., Applying micro-texture to cast iron surfaces to reduce the friction coefficient under lubricated conditions. Tribol. Lett. 28, 131–138 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9257-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Nilsson, B.G. Rosen, T.R. Thomas et al., Oil pockets and surface topography: mechanism of friction reduction, in Abstracts of the XI International Colloquium on Surfaces, Chemnitz Germany, 2–3 Feb 2004Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    I. Nogueira, A.M. Dias, R. Gras et al., An experimental model for mixed friction during running-in. Wear 253, 541–549 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(02),00065-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    N. Patir, H.S. Cheng, An average flow model for determining effects of three dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J. Lubr. Technol. 100(1), 12–17 (1978).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3453103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    P. Pawlus, Effects of honed cylinder surface topography on the wear of piston-piston ring-cylinder assemblies under artificially increased dustiness conditions. Tribol. Int. 26(1), 49–55 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(93),90038-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    P. Pawlus, W.A. Grabon, D. Czach, Calculation of plasticity index of honed cylinder liner textures. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1183(1), 012003 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1183/1/012003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. Pawlus, W. Zelasko, R. Reizer et al., Calculation of plasticity index of two-process surfaces. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 231, 572–582 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650116664826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    U. Pettersson, S. Jacobson, Influence of surface texture on boundary lubricated sliding contacts. Tribol. Int. 36(11), 857–864 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(03)00104-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    C.Y. Poon, R.S. Sayles, The classification of rough surface contacts in relation to tribology. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 25(1A), 249–256 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/25/1A/038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Pullen, J.B.P. Williamson, On the plastic contact of rough surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. A327, 159–173 (1972).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    B.J. Roylance, C.H. Bovington, G. Wang, A. Hubbard, Running-in wear behaviours of valve train system, in Vehicle Tribology, ed. by D. Dowson et al. Tribology Series, vol. 18 (1991), pp. 143–147Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    T.R. Thomas, Rough Surfaces (Imperial College Press, London, 1999)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    T.R. Thomas, B.G. Rosen, Determination of the optimum sampling interval for rough contact mechanics. Tribol. Int. 33, 601–610 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(00),00076-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    E. Tomanik, Modelling the asperity contact area on actual 3D surfaces. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1864 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1864
  48. 48.
    M. Wakuda, Y. Yamauchi, S. Kanzaki et al., Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact. Wear 254(3–4), 356–363 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03),00004-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    D.J. Whitehouse, Handbook of surface Metrology (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1994)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D.J. Whitehouse, J.F. Archard, The properties of random surface of significance in their contact. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. A316, 97–121 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    K.L. Woo, T.R. Thomas, Roughness, friction and wear: the effect of contact planform. Wear 57, 357–363 (1979).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(79),90109-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    S. Wos, W. Koszela, P. Pawlus, Determination of oil demand for textured surfaces under conformal contact conditions. Tribol. Int. 93, 602–613 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    S. Wos, W. Koszela, P. Pawlus, The effect of the shape of oil pockets on the friction force. Tribologia 4, 151–156 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. Yu, W. Huang, X. Wang, Dimple patterns design for different circumstances. Lubr. Sci. 25, 67–78 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ls.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Y. Zhao, D.M. Maietta, L. Chang, An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. J. Tribol. 20, 86–93 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.555332CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing Processes and Production EngineeringRzeszów University of TechnologyRzeszówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Manufacturing Processes and Production EngineeringRzeszów University of TechnologyRzeszówPoland
  3. 3.EME Aero Sp. z o. o.JasionkaPoland

Personalised recommendations