Advertisement

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Finland

  • Olli MäenpääEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law book series (GSCL, volume 39)

Abstract

The Finnish legal system shows only limited judicial deference to administrative discretion. Instead, more value is generally accorded to effective judicial protection and other related factors, such as adequate access to a court, guarantees of procedural fairness, the sufficiently broad scope of judicial review, effective remedies and a relatively active role for the administrative courts. In Finland, as in several other continental European jurisdictions with separate administrative courts, procedural law tends to attribute an active role to the courts. The courts exercise judicial power and play a central role in offering legal protection to individuals affected by administrative decision-making. Judicial review can constrain the exercise of executive power because of its emphasis on adherence to the law and legal principles. On the other hand, investigation of the advisability and expediency of an administrative decision falls outside the jurisdiction of the administrative courts. A further limit to judicial power is based on constitutional principles, more precisely on the separation of powers doctrine. According to that doctrine, the actual adoption of an administrative decision belongs exclusively to the sphere of executive power.

References

  1. Daly P (2012) A theory of deference in administrative law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elliott M (2001) The constitutional foundations of judicial review. Bloomsbury Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Galera S (ed) (2010) Judicial review: a comparative analysis inside the European legal system. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  4. Harlow C, Rawlings R (1997) Law and administration, 1st edn. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. 1984Google Scholar
  5. Hertogh M, Halliday S, Arup C (2004) Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: international and interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Letto-Vanamo P, Tamm D, Gram Mortensen B (eds) (2019) Nordic law in European context. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Mäenpää O (2017) Judiciary v. executive: judicial review and the exercise of executive power. Juridiska Föreningens Tidskrift 2–4:242–255Google Scholar
  8. Nuotio K et al (eds) (2012) Introduction to Finnish law and legal culture. Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  9. Spiliotopoulos E (ed) (2000) Towards a unified protection of citizens in Europe (?). Esperia, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations