Regulation and Competition of Taxi Services

  • Siniša Petrović
  • Tomislav JakšićEmail author
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 76)


Throughout the world, the taxi market is generally considered a heavily regulated market. Such regulation refers primarily to establishing market entry restrictions, establishing taxi fares schemes, setting up of minimal passenger safety and protection standards, as well as ensuring that certain universal service requirements are adhered by respective taxi operators. Market regulation is normally justified where externalities prevail that ultimately harm competition and go to the detriment of overall consumer wellbeing. Regulation of taxi markets resulted in the creation of closed market structures. This eventually led to the establishment of a monopoly or an oligopoly of a limited number of taxi operators that enjoyed significant economic protection, normally denied to other entrepreneurs. The need for such severe restriction of competition generally invoked upon the necessity of establishing a valid consumer protection environment. The appearance of Uber demonstrated how a strong-willed participant can stir the pot. Uber was generally being denied market entry on such restrictive regulatory grounds. Appearance of Uber revived interest in the dormant taxi market and raised the unpleasant issue of whether such stringent regulation can still be justified. This chapter will elaborate on the fundaments of regulatory intervention in a market, the current taxi market structure, the Uber business model and ultimately on the adequacy of grounds used to justify institution and enforcement of such regulatory measures in the taxi market.



  1. Aarhaug J, Skollerud K (2014) Taxi: different solutions in different segments. Transp Res Procedia 1(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Defossez DAL (2017) The regulation of a project of the deregulation: UBER in Brazil and the European Union. J Law Regul 3(1)Google Scholar
  3. Geradin D (2015a) Should Uber be allowed to compete in Europe? And if so how? George Mason University legal studies research paper LS 15-11. Law & economics research paper series 15-19Google Scholar
  4. Geradin D (2015b) Uber and the rule of law: should spontaneous liberalization be applauded or criticized? Compet Policy Int 11(1)Google Scholar
  5. Gorecki PK (2012) Troubled times: what role for competition and regulatory policy? Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) papers EC10Google Scholar
  6. Gorecki PK (2016) Competition and vested interests in taxis in Ireland: a tale of two statutory instruments. MPRA paper no. 74099Google Scholar
  7. Lynch K (2016) The reaction of competition law to Uber. Stud Law J QUB.
  8. Toner JP (1992) Regulation in the taxi industry. Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds ITS working paper 381Google Scholar
  9. Wyman KM (2017) Taxi regulation in the age of Uber. Legis Public Policy 20(1)Google Scholar

Monographs and Studies

  1. Blanco LO, van Houtte B (2017) EU regulation and competition law in the transport sector, 2nd edn. CroydonGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission (2016a) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, a European agenda for the collaborative economy, Brussels, 2-6-2016, COM/2016/0356 finalGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission (2016b) Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU, final report. Study contract no. MOVE/D3/SER/2015-564/SI2.715085Google Scholar
  4. Kozik J (2017) Regulating Uber in the light of the emerging sharing economy. Master thesis at Tallinn University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. Ndlovu N (2017) Uber vs. metered taxis: a competition issue or a regulatory nightmare. Competition Commission South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  6. Noguellou R, Renders D (2018) Uber & taxis, comparative law studies. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. OECD (2018) Taxi, ride-sourcing and ride-sharing service—background note by the secretariat. DAF/COMP/WP2 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. Productivity Commission Australia (1999) Regulation of the taxi industryGoogle Scholar
  9. Rahel S (2016) Economics of the taxi industry: an Uber shake-up. Wyoming scholars repository honors theses AY 15/16Google Scholar
  10. Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (2017) Regulation and competition—a literature review. Report 0218Google Scholar
  11. Zuluaga D (2017) Taxi and private hire vehicle regulation: a briefing. Institute for Economic AffairsGoogle Scholar

Online Publications

  1. Barainsky L, Gumberidze E, Nurul Amin M (2016) Uber and taxi regulations: are member states preserving a legal monopoly to the detriment of consumers? Researchgate portal. Accessed on 4 Mar 2019
  2. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2019) The dictionary portal. Accessed 3 Mar 2019
  3. Online Cambridge Dictionary (2019) The dictionary portal. Accessed 3 Mar 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations