Skip to main content

Economic Appraisal of Introducing Energy Efficiency in the Public Sector: Overview of Existing Economic Methods with Ex-post Application to Sustainable Energy Management Program in Croatia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings and Smart Communities

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Energy ((SPE))

Abstract

Sustainable energy management system is an important prerequisite for making informed choices about which buildings to retrofit, choosing from the entire existing building stock. However, the system itself does not say anything about the economic potential of the retrofit, what economic methods to use for appraising buildings and what indicators to look at if the aim is the highest monetary savings. This paper demonstrates to local and national governments as owners of public buildings; (1) how they can use existing data from energy management information system (EMIS) to achieve highest monetary savings; and (2) it is economically justified to implement EMIS to benefit from the highest monetary savings when choosing buildings for retrofit.

The hypothesis was tested on a stock of 602 public buildings from Zagreb, Croatia. Through an Intelligent Energy Efficiency project ZagEE, Zagreb city administration chose 87 buildings for energy retrofit. The estimated economic savings were compared to a scenario where optimal 87 buildings would be chosen. The difference in savings justifies the additional cost of performing energy audits of the entire building stock. Although monetary savings are only one of the reasons for choosing the order of buildings to be retrofitted, the authors argue that additional savings can result in such greater savings that additional buildings can then be retrofitted, and other objectives achieved. The intention is to raise awareness of the savings potential that is exposed when investing into an efficient EMIS and properly using its results to decide which buildings to retrofit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://zagee.hr/?page_id=166.

  2. 2.

    http://cei.hr/upload/2016/02/godisnji_plan_energetske_ucinkovitosti_grada_zagre_56bc950f80134.pdf.

  3. 3.

    http://cei.hr/upload/2017/04/grad_zagreb_58e642252c88a.pdf.

  4. 4.

    The data was in Croatian currency, Kunas, but the calculations were performed in Euros, using an average exchange rate of 7.5 Kuna per Euro.

  5. 5.

    The data is obtained from existing energy audits and the calculations were made according to the Croatian methodology for performing energy audits and energy certification of buildings.

References

  1. European Parliament. (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union Directive, (October), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng

  2. Tuominen, P., Reda, F., Dawoud, W., Elboshy, B., Elshafei, G., & Negm, A. (2015). Economic appraisal of energy efficiency in buildings using cost-effectiveness assessment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 422–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00195-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruparathna, R., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2016). Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1032–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: Best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy-makers. A resource of the national action plan for energy efficiency. Washington DC: Office of Air and Radiation Climate Protection Partnerships Division. Retrieved November 12, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: Best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy makers. Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. and Regulatory Assistance Project. (November), 96. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-programs/suca/resources.html.

  6. Home Performance Coalition. (2014). The national efficiency screening project mission statement. Retrieved from Home Performance Coalition. http://www.homeperformance.org/policy-research/advocacy/national-efficiency-screening-project.

  7. OECD/IEA. (2014). Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. Paris: IEA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission, DG ENER. (2012). Energy efficiency directive (2012/27/EU). Energy efficiency directive (2012/27/EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council (L 312/1), 11,15,16. Brussels, Belgium: OJ of the European Union. Retrieved June 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012L0027&from=EN

  9. Roberts, S. (2008). Altering existing buildings in the UK. Energy Policy, 36 (12), 4482–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemmet, S. (2013). Buildings and climate change. UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ministry of Economy. (2014). Pravilnik o sustavu za praćenje, mjerenje i verifikaciju ušteda energije. [Methodology on measurement and verification of EE savings] National Gazette, 1368(127/2014). Retrieved from http://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2015_06_71_1368.html.

  12. City of Zagreb. (2016, March 1). ZagEE. Retrieved from http://zagee.hr/?page_id=547&lang=en.

  13. Ministry of Economy. (2014, July 30). The third National Energy Efficiency Action Plan for the 2014–2016 period. 35. (E. Union, Trans.). Zagreb, Croatia: National Gazette. Retrieved 06 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_neeap_en_croatia.pdf.

  14. Economidou, M., Atanasiu, B., Despret, C., Maio, J., Nolte, I., & Rapf, O. (2011). Europe’s buildings under the microscope: A country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings. Buildings Performance Institute Europe-BPIE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mia Dragović Matosović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Matosović, M.D., Matosović, M. (2020). Economic Appraisal of Introducing Energy Efficiency in the Public Sector: Overview of Existing Economic Methods with Ex-post Application to Sustainable Energy Management Program in Croatia. In: Bertoldi, P. (eds) Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings and Smart Communities. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31459-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31459-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31458-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31459-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics