Advertisement

Economic Appraisal of Introducing Energy Efficiency in the Public Sector: Overview of Existing Economic Methods with Ex-post Application to Sustainable Energy Management Program in Croatia

  • Mia Dragović MatosovićEmail author
  • Marko Matosović
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Sustainable energy management system is an important prerequisite for making informed choices about which buildings to retrofit, choosing from the entire existing building stock. However, the system itself does not say anything about the economic potential of the retrofit, what economic methods to use for appraising buildings and what indicators to look at if the aim is the highest monetary savings. This paper demonstrates to local and national governments as owners of public buildings; (1) how they can use existing data from energy management information system (EMIS) to achieve highest monetary savings; and (2) it is economically justified to implement EMIS to benefit from the highest monetary savings when choosing buildings for retrofit.

The hypothesis was tested on a stock of 602 public buildings from Zagreb, Croatia. Through an Intelligent Energy Efficiency project ZagEE, Zagreb city administration chose 87 buildings for energy retrofit. The estimated economic savings were compared to a scenario where optimal 87 buildings would be chosen. The difference in savings justifies the additional cost of performing energy audits of the entire building stock. Although monetary savings are only one of the reasons for choosing the order of buildings to be retrofitted, the authors argue that additional savings can result in such greater savings that additional buildings can then be retrofitted, and other objectives achieved. The intention is to raise awareness of the savings potential that is exposed when investing into an efficient EMIS and properly using its results to decide which buildings to retrofit.

Keywords

Sustainable energy management in public buildings Economic appraisal of building stock Public building retrofit Cost-effectiveness analysis Energy efficiency programme Energy efficiency in the public sector 

References

  1. 1.
    European Parliament. (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union Directive, (October), 1–56.  https://doi.org/10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng
  2. 2.
    Tuominen, P., Reda, F., Dawoud, W., Elboshy, B., Elshafei, G., & Negm, A. (2015). Economic appraisal of energy efficiency in buildings using cost-effectiveness assessment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 422–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00195-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruparathna, R., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2016). Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1032–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: Best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy-makers. A resource of the national action plan for energy efficiency. Washington DC: Office of Air and Radiation Climate Protection Partnerships Division. Retrieved November 12, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. (2008). Understanding cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: Best practices, technical methods, and emerging issues for policy makers. Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. and Regulatory Assistance Project. (November), 96. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-programs/suca/resources.html.
  6. 6.
    Home Performance Coalition. (2014). The national efficiency screening project mission statement. Retrieved from Home Performance Coalition. http://www.homeperformance.org/policy-research/advocacy/national-efficiency-screening-project.
  7. 7.
    OECD/IEA. (2014). Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. Paris: IEA Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission, DG ENER. (2012). Energy efficiency directive (2012/27/EU). Energy efficiency directive (2012/27/EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council (L 312/1), 11,15,16. Brussels, Belgium: OJ of the European Union. Retrieved June 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012L0027&from=EN
  9. 9.
    Roberts, S. (2008). Altering existing buildings in the UK. Energy Policy, 36 (12), 4482–4486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lemmet, S. (2013). Buildings and climate change. UNEP.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ministry of Economy. (2014). Pravilnik o sustavu za praćenje, mjerenje i verifikaciju ušteda energije. [Methodology on measurement and verification of EE savings] National Gazette, 1368(127/2014). Retrieved from http://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2015_06_71_1368.html.
  12. 12.
    City of Zagreb. (2016, March 1). ZagEE. Retrieved from http://zagee.hr/?page_id=547&lang=en.
  13. 13.
    Ministry of Economy. (2014, July 30). The third National Energy Efficiency Action Plan for the 2014–2016 period. 35. (E. Union, Trans.). Zagreb, Croatia: National Gazette. Retrieved 06 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_neeap_en_croatia.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Economidou, M., Atanasiu, B., Despret, C., Maio, J., Nolte, I., & Rapf, O. (2011). Europe’s buildings under the microscope: A country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings. Buildings Performance Institute Europe-BPIE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for European Energy and Climate PolicyAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department for Energy System PlanningEnergy Institute Hrvoje PožarZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations