Advertisement

Laws and Court Cases Pertaining to Children: Offenders and Victims

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
Chapter

Abstract

The creation of the Juvenile Court in Cook County IL in 1899, followed by the establishment of juvenile courts in all other states, led to the development of a juvenile justice system.

Abuse of the parens patriae (parent substitute) principle by some officials and judges led to the involvement of the U.S. Supreme Court in matters pertaining to juvenile justice. These abuses included violation of civil rights, questionable police practices relating to questioning, interrogation, arrest procedures and detention of juveniles were challenged and declared unconstitutional by the Court. Other cases brought before the court pertained to the judicial process, detention and sentencing of juveniles The U.S. Supreme Court often referred to the principle of fundamental fairness in its decisions on the violation of the constitutional rights of juveniles.

Keywords

Law Due process rights Parens patriae Fundamental fairness principle “Best interests of the child” Preventive detention U.S. Supreme Court decisions 

References

  1. American Bar Association. (1993). America’s children at risk: A national agenda for legal action. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Presidential Working Group on the Unmet Needs of Children and Their Families.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, W. (1949). Jail bait, NY: Breenberg.Google Scholar
  3. Bookser, S. (2004). Making Gault meaningful: Access to counsel and quality of representation in delinquent proceedings for indigent youth. Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 3, 298–328.Google Scholar
  4. Bortner, M. (1982). Inside a juvenile court: The tarnished ideal of individualized justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feld, B. (1999). The right to counsel in juvenile court: An empirical study of when lawyers appear and the difference they make. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 79, 1185–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feld, B. (2004). Juvenile transfer. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(4), 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feld, B., & Schaefer, S. (2010). The right to counsel in juvenile court: The conundrum of attorneys as an aggravating factor at disposition. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 713–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hemmens, C., Steiner, B., & Mueller, D. (2004). Significant cases in juvenile justice. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Mezey, S. (1996).Children in court, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rothman, D. (1971). The discovery of the asylum , Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  12. Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report (editors). Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
    • 1
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
    • 2
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
    • 3
  1. 1.Sociology/Justice StudiesKent State UniversityTallmadgeUSA
  2. 2.TallmadgeUSA
  3. 3.Williams, Welser & Kratcoski LLCKentUSA

Personalised recommendations