Advertisement

Perspectives on Juveniles Incarcerated in Secure Facilities

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
Chapter

Abstract

Youth adjudicated delinquent are given either determinate dispositions (incarceration for a specific amount of time) or indeterminate dispositions (release on parole on the recommendation of a release committee). The population of long-term correctional facilities is predominately composed of hard core serious offenders. In additional to the secure facilities, juvenile correctional facilities include training schools, forestry camps, reception centers, and shelter homes. Some juveniles tried as adults are held in adult correctional facilities.

Youth held in secure facilities are classified and provided with treatment according to their dangerousness, needs, and maturity (age). Educational and vocational programs are used, along with various types of individual and group therapy and counseling.

The institutions for females are generally less secure and may emphasis different types of programming. Often the administration of secure correctional facilities must focus more on security than on treatment. Some treatment programs are geared toward promoting security in the institution rather than the needs of the youth.

Keywords

Determinate dispositions Indeterminate dispositions Juvenile correctional facilities Detention centers Jails Inmate life minimum standards Youth leader roles Levels of security Programming 

References

  1. Caldwell, R., & Black, J. (1971). Juvenile delinquency. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Cellini, H. (1994). Management & treatment of violent institutionalized delinquents. Corrections Today, 57(40), 98–101.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, L. (1974). Our children’s keepers. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.Google Scholar
  4. Correctional Council of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (1975). Status offenders and the juvenile court NY: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, M. (1991). Children in adult jails: A look at liability issues. American Jails, 4(5), 30–37.Google Scholar
  6. Feld, B. C. (1984). A comparative analysis of organizational structure and inmate subculture in institutions for juvenile offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 27(3), 106–108.Google Scholar
  7. Gerard, R. (1970). Institutional innovations in juvenile corrections. Federal Probation, 34(4), 37–44.Google Scholar
  8. Hamparian, D., David, J., Jackson, J., & McGraw, R. (1985). The young criminal years of the violent few. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  9. Hengesh, D. (1991). Think of boot camps as a foundation for change, not an instant cure. Corrections Today, 53(6), 106–108.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, D. (1984). It took trains to put street kids on the right track out of the slums (Vol. 15, p. 95). Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
  11. Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act. (1974, Amended 1977). National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Juvenile justice and delinquency prevention (p. 310). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  12. Kerle, K. (1991). Juveniles and jails. American Jails, 4(5), 30.Google Scholar
  13. Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  14. Kratcoski, P. (2019). Unpublished research:1969–2019: Past and present.Google Scholar
  15. Leonard, C. (1879). Family homes for paupers and delinquent children. Chicago; Proceedings: Annual Conference of Charities. Quoted in Platt, A. The rise of the child saving movement (p. 123).Google Scholar
  16. Minnesoto Division of Juvenile Justice (2019). Red Wing Juvenile Facility https://mn.gov/doc/facilities/red-wing/juvenile/accessed7/6/2019
  17. Moore, J. (1991). Overcoming the past. Corrections Today, 53(1), 43–47.Google Scholar
  18. Morales v Turman. (1974). 383 F. Supp. 53 (Ed. Texas).Google Scholar
  19. Nelson v. Heyne. (1974). 491 F.2.2d (7 Cir).Google Scholar
  20. North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation. (2019). Youth Correctional Center. Retrieved April 19, 2019, from https://docr.nd.gov/facilityoffice-locations-test/division-juvenile-services/youth-correctional-center
  21. Ohio Department of Youth Services, (2019). Juvenile Correctional Facilities-Circleville. https//www.dys.ohio.gov/juvenile-correctionalfacilities/circlevilleJCF. Accessed 6 Jul 2019Google Scholar
  22. Platt, A. (1974). The rise of the child-saving movement: A study of social policy and correctional reform. In F. Faust & P. Brantingham (Eds.), Juvenile justice philosophy (pp. 129–137). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Poole, E., & Regoli, R. (1983). Violence in juvenile institutions. Criminology, 21(2), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schall v. Martin (1984). 52 U.S.L.W. 4681.Google Scholar
  25. Sedlak, A., & McPherson, K. (2010). Conditions of confinement: Findings from the survey of youth in residential placement. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin (May). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  26. Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
  27. Street, D., Vinter, R. D., & Perrow, C. (1966). Organization for treatment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Justice. (1977). Juvenile correctional reform in Massachusetts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Vanderwall, D. (2001). Multi-county juvenile attention system responsibility behavior program. Canton, OH: Multi-County Juvenile Attention System.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
    • 1
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
    • 2
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
    • 3
  1. 1.Sociology/Justice StudiesKent State UniversityTallmadgeUSA
  2. 2.TallmadgeUSA
  3. 3.Williams, Welser & Kratcoski LLCKentUSA

Personalised recommendations