Advertisement

Storytelling on Cooking Shows

  • Kelsi MatwickEmail author
  • Keri Matwick
Chapter

Abstract

Television cooking shows provide a space for discourse about food, with storytelling emerging as a way to share and interpret experiences. Entertaining and educating simultaneously, cooking show hosts tell recipes and weave in stories, a form of narrative marked by distinctive linguistic and structural components. Cooking shows offer a kind of ‘super-story’ in that the show itself is a story with a consistent teller from week to week, each episode consists of a plot and a beginning and end, and within each episode are individual stories embedded within the recipe telling. Stories give context to the cooking, giving the act more meaning than just making food. The domestic scenario often revolves around a narrative of cooking demonstrations, for example, while travel cooking shows accompany celebrity chefs on tour as they progress from location to location, presenting viewers with ethnographic experiences of food cultures. Five different frameworks can be applied to analyzing cooking shows as a story: narrative, folklore, myth, media studies, and culinary tourism, each of which offers insight to the construction of celebrity chef expertise and authenticity. The expanding genre of cooking shows necessitates a broadened scope in theory to examine the shifting relations between participants.

References

  1. Alleyne, B. (2015). Narrative networks: Stories approaches in a digital age. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, R. (1986). Television/sound. In T. Modleski (Ed.), Studies in entertainment: Critical approaches to mass culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1981). Gastro-politics in Hindu South Asia. American Ethnologist, 8(3), 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1972). Ornamental cooker. In Mythologies. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights: Waveland.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, A. (1994). Telling stories. In D. Graddol & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.), Media texts: Authors and readers (pp. 100–118). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Blum-Kulka, S. (2001). The many faces of with Meni: The history and stories of one Israeli talk show. In A. Tolson (Ed.), Television talk shows: Discourse, performance, spectacle (pp. 89–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Bonner, F. (2003). Ordinary television. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cheshire, J., & Ziebland, S. (2005). Narrative as a resource in accounts of the experiences of illness. In J. Thornborrow & J. Coates (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of narrative (pp. 17–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Contois, E. (2018). Welcome to Flavortown: Guy Fieri’s populist American food culture. American Studies, 57(3), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cotter, C. (1997). Claiming a piece of the pie: How the language of recipes defines community. In A. Bower (Ed.), Recipes for reading: Community cookbooks, stories, histories (pp. 51–72). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  15. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). The handbook of narrative analysis. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Graburn, N. (1989). Tourism: The sacred journey. In V. Smith (Ed.), Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (pp. 21–37). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Labov, W., & Waletzsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (2nd ed., pp. 214–226). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long, L. (2004). Culinary tourism. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  22. Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2006). Buying and selling: Mediating persuasion in British property shows. Media, Culture and Society, 28(5), 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2009). Television discourse: Analysing language in the media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matwick, K., & Matwick, K. (2014). Storytelling and synthetic personalization on television cooking shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matwick, K., & Matwick, K. (2015). Inquiry in television cooking shows. Discourse & Communication, 9(3), 313–330.Google Scholar
  26. Matwick, K., & Matwick, K. (2017). Cooking at home: A multimodal narrative analysis of the Food Network. Discourse, Context & Media, 17, 20–29.Google Scholar
  27. Modleski, T. (1983). The rhythms of reception: Daytime television and women’s work. In E. Ann Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television: Critical approaches—An anthology (pp. 67–75). Frederick: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
  28. Nathanson, E. (2009). As easy as pie: Cooking shows, domestic efficiency, and postfeminist temporality. Television & New Media, 10, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norrick, N. (2010). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  30. Norrick, N. (2011). Conversational recipe telling. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2740–2761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Keeffe, A. (2006). Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of folk tale. Austin: University of Texas Press. (First published in Russian, 1928).Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, J. (1981). Personal narratives reconsidered. Journal of American Folklore, 94, 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowland, R. (1990). On mythic criticism. Communication Studies, 41(2), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Scannell, P. (1991). Introduction: The relevance of talk. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Schegloff, E. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silverblatt, A. (2007). Genre studies in mass media: A handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, K. (1999). Storytelling in the new Hollywood: Understanding classical narrative technique. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, K. (2003). Storytelling in film and television. ​Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Thornborrow, J. (2015). The discourse of public participation media: From talk show to Twitter. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Toolan, M. (1988). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, R. (1974/1992). Television: Technology and cultural form. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Journalism and CommunicationsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of HumanitiesNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations