• Regine HampelEmail author


This chapter revisits the role of theory in CALL and argues for more theoretically-influenced approaches to CALL research, approaches such as complex systems theory that allow researchers to focus on how new technologies are changing learning, what the implications are for learners and teachers and how they can be supported. A summary of how the new technologies have been causing a phase shift, disrupting tradition patterns of meaning-making in the classroom and encouraging new patterns is followed by a confirmatory response to Roger Säljö’s question which he posed in 1999 about whether the new information technologies are radically transforming the way we learn and which opened this book.


CALL theories Disruption and transformation 


  1. Breen, M. P. (1999). Teaching language in the postmodern classroom. In R. Ribé (Ed.), Developing learner autonomy in foreign language learning (pp. 47–64). Barcelona: University of Barcelona Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cross, S., Wolfenden, F., & Adinolfi, L. (2018, November 6–8). Transforming classroom observation and professional development with 360-degree video and mobile VR. In mEducation Alliance Symposium. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Kannan, J., & Munday, P. (2018). New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and arti cial intelligence. In C. Fernández Juncal & N. Hernández Muñoz (Eds.), Vías de transformación en la enseñanza de lenguas con mediación tecnológica. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76, 13–30.
  4. O’Rourke, B., & Stickler, U. (2017). Synchronous communication technologies for language learning: Promise and challenges in research and pedagogy. Language Learning in Higher Education: Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS), 7(1), 1–20. Scholar
  5. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human–technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language StudiesThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations