An Integrated Approach for the Evaluation of Sustainability and Patient Satisfaction in Hospitals: A Case of Turkey

  • Aziz Kemal Konyalıoğlu
  • Tuğçe BeldekEmail author
  • Hatice Camgöz Akdağ
  • Gizem Deniz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Improving quality is a very important issue in hospitals. Measuring quality is directly proportional to measuring sustainability criteria. Customer satisfaction is seemingly correlated with the factors which affect sustainability evaluation. Besides, the evaluation sustainability and satisfaction consist of different kinds of uncertainties. In this case, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is very useful tool to evaluate customer satisfaction integrated with the fact that the weights of QFD are calculated by the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this study, we propose an integrated approach for the evaluation of sustainability in Turkish Hospitals by using Quality Function Deployment and Analytic Hierarchy Process in order to assess patient satisfaction by considering the most important criterium in hospitals. This study enlightens the relations between patient satisfaction in hospitals and sustainability assessments in the same place.


QFD Quality management Healthcare AHP 


  1. Bergquist, K., Abeysekera, J.: Quality function deployment (QFD)—a means for developing usable products. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 18(4), 269–275 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouchereau, V., Rowlands, H.: Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking Int. J. 7(1), 8–20 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., Kajanus, M.: Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For. Policy Econ. 1(1), 41–52 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Saaty, T.L.: Analytic hierarchy process. In: Gass, S.I., Fu, M.C. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, Boston (2013)Google Scholar
  6. Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 1–29 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wind, Y., Saaty, T.L.: Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag. Sci. 26(7), 641–658 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zaim, S., Şevkli, M.: The methodology of quality function deployment with crisp and fuzzy approaches and an application in the Turkish shampoo industry. J. Econ. Soc. Res. 4, 27–32 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aziz Kemal Konyalıoğlu
    • 1
  • Tuğçe Beldek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hatice Camgöz Akdağ
    • 1
  • Gizem Deniz
    • 1
  1. 1.Management EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations