Advertisement

How Regional Are Regional Headquarters? The “Latinization” of Control in European Structures of a Brazilian MNC

  • Roberta AguzzoliEmail author
  • Ilona Hunek
Chapter

Abstract

Regionalization of operations is a trend among multinationals. Regional structures bridge the distance between the corporate headquarters and local subsidiaries and markets by acting as integral intermediaries. A growing number of multinationals from emerging markets establish their regional headquarters in Europe, yet little is known about the role of regional structures in emerging multinationals. One of key questions is, how much autonomy and influence does the regional headquarters have in managing regional operations? To examine the relationship between headquarters and regional headquarters we adopt the micro-political perspective. Based on a case study of a Brazilian multinational’s activities in Switzerland, this study contributes to the literature about the role of regional headquarters in the internationalization of multilatinas. It also explains how corporate headquarters achieved dominance over the European headquarters by deploying different power capabilities, mainly power over processes and power over meaning.

References

  1. Aguilera RV, Ciravegna L, Cuervo-Cazurra A, Gonzalez-Perez MA (2017) Multilatinas and the internationalization of Latin American firms. J World Bus 52:447–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfoldi EA, Clegg LJ, McGaughey SL (2012) Coordination at the edge of the empire: the delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates. J Int Manag 18:276–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambos B, Schlegelmilch BB (2010) The new role of regional management. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1998) Managing across borders: the transnational solution, 2nd edn. Random House Business Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker-Ritterspach FAA, Dörrenbächer C (2011) An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations. Manag Int Rev 51:533–559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0083-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belderbos R, Du HS, Goerzen A (2017) Global cities, connectivity, and the location choice of mnc regional headquarters. J Manag Stud 54:1271–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blazejewski S, Becker-Ritterspach FAA (2011) Conflict in headquarters-subsidiary relations: a critical literature review and new directions. In: Dörrenbächer C, Geppert M (eds) Politics and power in the multinational corporation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 139–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blazejewski S, Becker-Ritterspach FAA (2016) Theoretical foundations and conceptual definitions. In: Becker-Ritterspach FAA, Blazejewski S, Dörrenbächer C, Geppert M (eds) Micropolitics in the multinational corporation: foundations, applications and new directions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–50Google Scholar
  9. Börsch A (2008) Institutional variation and coordination patterns in CMEs: Swiss and German corporate governance in comparison. In: Hancké B, Rhodes M, Thatcher M (eds) Beyond varieties of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 173–193Google Scholar
  10. Céspedes J, González M, Molina CA (2010) Ownership and capital structure in Latin America. J Bus Res 63:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu RA, Wood T Jr (2008) Cultura organizacional brasileira pós-globalização: global ou local? Rev Adm Pública 42:969–991.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122008000500008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clegg S, Josserand E, Mehra A, Pitsis TS (2016) The transformative power of network dynamics: a research agenda. Organ Stud 37:277–291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616629047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conroy KM, Collings DG, Clancy J (2017) Regional headquarter’s dual agency role: micro-political strategies of alignment and self-interest. Br J Manag 28:390–406.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conti CR, Parente R, de VFC (2016) When distance does not matter: implications for Latin American multinationals. J Bus Res 69:1980–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuervo-Cazurra A (2008) The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: the case of multilatinas. J Int Manag 14:138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards P (2006) Power and ideology in the workplace. Work Employ Soc 20:571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006067015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards P, Bélanger J (2009) The multinational firm as a contested terrain. In: Collinson S, Morgan G (eds) Images of the multinational firm. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards T, Rees C (2006) The transfer of human resource practices in multinational companies. In: Edwards T, Rees C (eds) International human resource management: Globalization, national systems and multinational companies. Prentice Hall, Harlow, pp 91–110Google Scholar
  19. Enright MJ (2005) The roles of regional management centers. Manag Int Rev 45:83–102Google Scholar
  20. Evans P, Lorange P (1989) The two logics behind human resource management. In: Evans P, Doz YL, Laurent A (eds) Human resource management in international firms. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 144–161Google Scholar
  21. Ferner A, Quintanilla J (1998) Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity or a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization’. Int J Hum Resour Manag 9:710–731.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095851998340973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferner A, Almond P, Colling T, Edwards T (2005) Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: between micro-politics and macro-institutions. Br J Ind Relat 43:703–728.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2005.00480.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferner A, Edwards T, Tempel A (2012) Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Hum Relat 65:163–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711429494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleming P, Spicer A (2014) Power in management and organization science. Acad Manag Ann 8:237–298.  https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.875671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fluder R, Hotz-Hart B (1998) Switzerland: still as smooth as clockwork? In: Ferner A, Hyman R (eds) Changing industrial relations in Europe. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 262–282Google Scholar
  26. Geppert M, Dörrenbächer C (2014) Politics and power within multinational corporations: mainstream studies, emerging critical approaches and suggestions for future research. Int J Manag Rev 16:226–244.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geppert M, Becker-Ritterspach FAA, Mudambi R (2016) Politics and power in multinational companies: integrating the international business and organization studies perspectives. Organ Stud 37:1209–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616656152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillén MF, García-Canal E (2009) The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. Acad Manag Perspect 23:23–35.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardy C (1996) Understanding power: bringing about strategic change. Br J Manag 7:3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00144.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harzing A-W (2001) Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: the role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries. J World Bus 36:366–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00061-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Homlong N, Springler E (2019) Impact of Chinese multinationals on global labor conditions and European strategies. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  33. Lange KSG, Becker-Ritterspach FAA (2016) Micropolitics in emerging market multinational corporations (EMNCs) as a field of new research. In: Becker-Ritterspach FAA, Blazejewski S, Dörrenbächer C, Geppert M (eds) Micropolitics in the multinational corporation: foundations, applications and new directions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 281–297Google Scholar
  34. Lukes S (2005) Power. A radical view, 2nd edn. Macmillan International Higher Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo Y, Tung RL (2007) International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. J Int Bus Stud 38:481–498.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luo Y, Zhang H (2016) Emerging market MNEs: qualitative review and theoretical directions. J Int Manag 22:333–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahnke V, Ambos B, Nell PC, Hobdari B (2012) How do regional headquarters influence corporate decisions in networked MNCs? J Int Manag 18:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J Polit 24:662.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2128040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mellahi K, Frynas JG, Collings DG (2016) Performance management practices within emerging market multinational enterprises: the case of Brazilian multinationals. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:876–905.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1042900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morgan G (2001) The multinational firm. Organizing across institutional and national divides. In: Morgan G, Kristensen PH, Whitley R (eds) The multinational firm: organizing across institutional and national divides. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  41. Morgan G, Kristensen PH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Hum Relat 59:1467–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706072866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan G, Kelly B, Sharpe D, Whitley R (2003) Global managers and Japanese multinationals: internationalization and management in Japanese financial institutions. Int J Hum Resour Manag 14:389–407.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519022000031816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mudambi R, Pedersen T, Andersson U (2014) How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. J World Bus 49:101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paik Y, Sohn JHD (2004) Striking a balance between global integration and local responsiveness: the case of Toshiba Corporation in redefining regional headquarters’ role. Organ Anal 12:347–359Google Scholar
  45. Piekkari R, Nell PC, Ghauri PN (2010) Regional management as a system. Manag Int Rev 50:513–532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0044-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rees C, Edwards T (2009) Management strategy and HR in international mergers: choice, constraint and pragmatism. Hum Resour Manag J 19:24–39.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00087.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ribeiro D (1995) O povo brasileiro: a formação e o sentido do Brasil. Companhia das Letras; Editora Schwarcz, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  48. Royle T (2004) Employment practices of multinationals in the Spanish and German quick-food sectors: low-road convergence? Eur J Ind Relat 10:51–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680104041191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rugman AM, Verbeke A (2004) A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. J Int Bus Stud 35:3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider BR (2013) Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sethi D (2009) Are multinational enterprises from the emerging economies global or regional? Eur Manag J 27:356–365.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm Sci Q 50:35–67.  https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan D (1992) Organization in American MNCs: the perspective of the European regional headquarters. Manag Int Rev:237–250Google Scholar
  54. Tavares M, Ferraz J (2007) Internacionalização e os países emergentes. In: Fleury MTL, Fleury A (eds) Internacionalização e os países emergentes. Atlas, São Paulo, pp 120–141Google Scholar
  55. Tempel A, Edwards T, Ferner A, Muller-Camen M, Wächter H (2006) Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: collective representation practices of US multinationals in Britain and Germany. Hum Relat 59:1543–1570.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706072863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright EO (2000) Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. Am J Sociol 105:957–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1086/210397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yeung HW-c, Poon J, Perry M (2001) Towards a regional strategy: the role of regional headquarters of foreign firms in Singapore. Urban Stud 38:157–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980124278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durham University Business SchoolDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of StrategyKozminski UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations