Advertisement

Why Are Emerging Market Multinationals Different? Challenges of a New Version of State Capitalism

  • Andreas NölkeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is based on the assumption that a major feature of emerging market multinationals appears to be their close relationship with their home country states. To be sure, many Western multinational corporations (MNCs) cultivate close relationships with their home states as well (as, for instance, recently witnessed in the case of the rescue operations for the financial sector), but this chapter investigates the special quality of the relationship between the state and major corporations originating from countries outside of the recent center of the world economy, as well as exploring how this special quality affects the cross-border activities of these corporations. In order to address this task, it opts for an integration of approaches traditionally kept separate because of the conventional disciplinary separation between international business and political economy. This integration demonstrates that the expansion of emerging market multinationals heralds a new wave of state capitalism.

References

  1. Abu-El-Haj J (2007) From interdependence to neo-mercantilism. Lat Am Perspect 34:92–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X07306244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan L (ed) (2011) The emergence of southern multinationals: their impact on Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan L, Bakir C (eds) (2016) Emerging market multinationals in Europe. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley PJ, Clegg JL, Cross AR, Voss H (2010) What can emerging markets learn from the outward direct investment policies of advanced countries? In: Sauvant KP, McAllister G, Maschek WA (eds) Foreign direct investments from emerging markets: the challenges ahead, vol 116. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 243–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifton J, Comín FA, Díaz Fuentes D (2007) Transforming network services in Europe and the Americas: from ugly ducklings to swans? In: Clifton J, Comín FA, Díaz Fuentes D (eds) Transforming public enterprise in Europe and North America: networks, integration and transnationalisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  6. Copara JAM (2014) Brazil’s ruling party and the internationalization of Brazilian companies. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:256–273.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-05-2014-0026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuervo-Cazurra A, Ramamurti R (2014) Understanding multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning JH (1986) The investment development and third world multinationals. In: Kahn KM (ed) Multinationals of the south: new actors in the international economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, pp 15–47Google Scholar
  9. Flynn M (2007) Between subimperialism and globalization. Lat Am Perspect 34:9–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X07308113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldstein A (2007) Multinational companies from emerging economies. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein A (2013) The political economy of global business: the case of the BRICs. Glob Policy 4:162–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grätz J (2012) “Russland” als globaler Wirtschaftsakteur: Handlungsressourcen und Strategien der Öl- und Gaskonzerne. Doctoral Thesis. Goethe University, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  13. Grätz J (2014) Russia’s multinationals: network state capitalism goes global. In: Nölke A (ed) Multinational corporations from emerging markets: state capitalism 3.0. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 90–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall PA, Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of capitalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassel A, Lütz S (2010) Durch die Krise aus der Krise?: Die neue Stärke des Staates der moderne staat 3:251–271Google Scholar
  16. He S, Fallon G, Khan Z, Lew YK, Kim K-H, Wei P (2017) Towards a new wave in internationalization of innovation? The rise of China’s innovative MNEs, strategic coupling, and global economic organization. Can J Adm Sci 34:343–355.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopewell K (2014) The transformation of state-business relations in an emerging economy. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:291–309.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-03-2014-0019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson G, Deeg R (2006) How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analyses of capitalist diversity. MPIfG discussion paper 6/2, CologneGoogle Scholar
  19. Masiero G, Ogasavara MH, Caseiro L, Junior SF (2014) Financing the expansion of Brazilian multinationals into Europe: the role of the Brazilian development bank (BNDES). In: Nölke A (ed) Multinational corporations from emerging markets: state capitalism 3.0. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 130–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathews JA (2002) Competitive Advantages of the latecomer firm: a resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pac J Manag 19:467–488.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020586223665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Misoczky MC, Imasato T (2014) The Brazilian sub-imperialist strategy of regional insertion. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:274–290.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-04-2014-0024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nölke A (2011a) Non-triad multinational enterprises and global economic institutions. In: Claes DH, Knutsen CH (eds) Governing the global economy: politics, institutions, and economic development. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 277–291Google Scholar
  23. Nölke A (2011b) Transnational economic order and national economic institutions. Comparative capitalism meets international political economy. MPIfG Working Paper 11/3. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, CologneGoogle Scholar
  24. Nölke A (2013) Der Aufstieg multinationaler Unternehmen aus Schwellenländern, Staatskapitalismus in besonderer Form. DMS – der moderne Staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 6:49–63Google Scholar
  25. Nölke A (2014a) Brazilian corporations, the state and transnational activity: introduction to the special issue. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:230–236.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-03-2014-0015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nölke A (2014b) Conclusion: state support for emerging market multinationals. In: Nölke A (ed) Multinational corporations from emerging markets: state capitalism 3.0. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nölke A (ed) (2014c) Multinational corporations from emerging markets: state capitalism 3.0. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Nölke A, Claar S (2012) Tiefe Integration in der Praxis der Nord-Süd-Beziehungen: Vergleichende Perspektiven. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28:80–98.  https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-28-2-80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nölke A, May C (2018) Handbook of the international political economy of the corporation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Nölke A, Taylor H (2010) Non-triad multinationals and global governance: still a north-south conflict? In: Ougaard M, Leander A (eds) Business and global governance. Routledge, London, pp 156–177Google Scholar
  31. Nölke A, ten BT, Claar S, May C (2015) Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: implications from the rise of large emerging economies. Eur J Int Rel 21:538–567.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114553682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peña AM (2014) The political trajectory of the Brazilian CSR movement. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:310–328.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-03-2014-0016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips N (2004) The southern cone model. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramamurti R (2008) What have we learned about emerging-market MNEs? Paper prepared for the conference on emerging market multinationals: outward FDI from emerging and developing economies, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramamurti R, Singh JV (eds) (2009) Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodrigues SB, Dieleman M (2018) The internationalization paradox: untangling dependence in multinational state hybrids. J World Bus 53:39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sauvant K, Maschek M, McAllister G (eds) (2010) Foreign direct investments from emerging markets. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor HL (2014) Sector creation and evolution. In: Nölke A (ed) Multinational corporations from emerging markets: state capitalism 3.0. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 130–154Google Scholar
  39. Taylor H, Nölke A (2010) Global players from India: a political economy perspective. In: Sauvant KP, McAllister G, Maschek WA (eds) Foreign direct investments from emerging markets: the challenges ahead, vol 9. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ten Brink T (2011) Kooperation oder Konfrontation?: Der Aufstieg Chinas in der globalen politischen Ökonomie. MPIfG working paper, No 11/7 11/7. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52725/1/675831628.pdf
  41. Tukic (2018) The role of MNCs in China and Brazil’s foreign policy towards developing states in Africa. Doctoral Thesis. Stellenbosch University, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  42. van Tulder R (2010) Toward a renewed stages theory for BRIC multinational enterprises? A home country bargaining approach. In: Sauvant KP, McAllister G, Maschek WA (eds) Foreign direct investments from emerging markets: the challenges ahead, vol 37. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wells LT (1983) Third world multinationals: the rise of foreign investment from developing countries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Winterhalter S, Zeschky MB, Neumann L, Gassmann O (2017) Business models for frugal innovation in emerging markets: the case of the medical device and laboratory equipment industry. Technovation 66-67:3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wooldridge A (2012) The visible hand: special report state capitalism. Jan 21, 2012. The Economist. Economist Newspaper, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Social SciencesGoethe UniversityFrankfurt/MainGermany

Personalised recommendations