Modeling of Hydrological and Climatic Resources of the Landscape for Sustainable Land Use at Small Watersheds

  • Alexander A. Erofeev
  • Sergey G. Kopysov
Part of the Landscape Series book series (LAEC, volume 26)


The analysis of conditions for the runoff formation is believed to be the useful example of applying theoretical knowledge to study interrelations between landscape structure and functioning. The practical importance of such knowledge is seen in developing area zoning which takes into account microclimatic conditions and is aimed at sustainable organization of landscape structure and effective land use at the level of the small watershed. To model the water runoff and certain elements of water balance in the study area, we calculated topographically mediated indicative values of water cycle and solar radiation and assessed how they are related to the diversity of landscape conditions affecting runoff formation. The variability in growing conditions at different landforms was studied using the original method of hydroclimatic calculations and Ramenskiy’s vegetation scales which provide information on species sensitivity to moisture content. After that, the detected diversity was considered as rationale for modeling optimal distribution of land use types. The application of the method provides new opportunities for effective use of landscape resources as well for the sustainable development of natural and social systems. This method is believed to be of particular relevance for the newly cultivated agricultural lands and buffer zones of nature protected area.


Land use Water balance Landscape conditions Topographic attributes Landscape physics 



This research was financially supported by The Tomsk State University Competitiveness Improvement Programme (Project No.


  1. ASTER GDEM. (2009). Аccessed 01 May 2018.
  2. Beven, K. J., & Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrolological Science Bulletin, 24, 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982). A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 55, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dokuchaev, V. V. (1892). Our steppes in the past and at the present time. St. Petersburg. Evdokimov’s printing house. 128 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. Erofeev, A. A., Li, V. G., & Kopysov, S. G. (2017). Experience of a terrestrial laser scanning of natural landscapes of the southeast of West Siberia. In Contemporary problems of geography and geology. Proceedings of the IVth All-Russian scientific and practical conference (Vol. 1, pp. 57–61). Tomsk: Tomsk State University. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1211–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS GIS). (2018). Accessed 01 May 2018.
  8. Glugla, G., Jankiewich, P., Rachinow, C., et al. (2003). BAGLUVA. Wasserhaushaltsverfahren zur berechnung vieljähriger mittelwerte der tatsächlichen verdunstung und des gesamtabflusses. BfG – 1342. Koblenz: Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde.Google Scholar
  9. Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., et al. (2012). Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karnatsevich, I. V., Mezentseva, O. V., Tusupbekov, G. A., & Bikbulatova, G. G. (2007). Study of the dynamics and mapping of elements of energy and water balance and characteristics of energy and water availability. Omsk: Omsk State Agricultural University Press. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  11. Kopysov, S. G. (2014). Parametrical expression of landscape conditions of runoff in the method of hydroclimatic calculations. Geography and Natural Resources, 3, 157–161. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  12. Kopysov, S. G. (2015). Reflection of the ecosystem processes in method of hydro-climatic calculations. In Reflection of bio-, geo, antropospheric interactions in soils and soll cover (pp. 417–421). Tomsk: Izdatel’skij dom TGU. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Kopysov, S. G., & Yarlykov, R. V. (2015). Experience in organization of hydrological and climatic observations on small model catchments of West Siberia. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. GeoАssets Engineering, 326(12), 115–121. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. Kopysov, S. G., Erofeev, A. A., & Zemtsov, V. A. (2015). Estimation of water balance over catchment areas taking into account the heterogeneity of their landscape conditions. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 72(3), 380–385. Scholar
  15. Mezentsev, V. S. (1982). Hydrological calculations for melioration. Omsk: Omsk Agricultural Institute Publishing house. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991). Digital terrain modeling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Myshlyakov, S., & Glotov, A. (2015). «Geoanalitika.Argo» – an innovative solution for agricultural monitoring. Geomatics, 2(27), 58–62. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  18. Odum, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  19. Planchon, O., & Darboux, F. (2002). A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models. Catena, 46(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prikhod’ko, N. N., Shaldej, V. V., & Pishchak, D. V. (1994). Issues of rational nature management and ecological optimization of the west of Ukraine landscapes. In Problems of regional ecology. Vol. 2. Regional nature management (pp. 26–35). Tomsk: Krasnoe znamya. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  21. Ramamohana, R. P., & Suneetha, P. (2012). Land use modeling for sustainable rural development. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 1(5), 519–532.Google Scholar
  22. Ramensky, L. G. (1971). Problems and methods for studying vegetation cover. Selected works. Leningrad: Nauka. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  23. Rodriguez, E., Morris, C. S., Belz, J. E., Chapin, E. C. et al. (2005). An assessment of the SRTM topographic products. Technical report JPL D-31639. Pasadena, California: Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Google Scholar
  24. Shashko, D. I. (1967). Agro-climatic zoning of the USSR. Moscow: Kolos. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  25. Shmakin, A. B., Krenke, A. N., Mihajlov, Y. A., & Turkov, D. V. (2001). Role of the landscape structure of terrestrial surface in climatic system. Proceedings of Russian Academy of sciences, geographical series, 4, 38–43. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). (2018). Accessed 01 May 2018.
  27. Specialized data for climatic research. (2017). Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
  28. System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA). (2018). Accessed 01 May 2018.
  29. Sysuev, V. V. (2014). Basic concepts of the physical and mathematical theory of geosystems. In K. N. Dyakonov, V. M. Kotlyakov, & T. I. Kharitonova (Eds.), Issues in Geography (Horizons of landscape studies) (Vol. 138, pp. 65–100). Moscow: Kodeks. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  30. Tomilov, N. A. (2001). Russians of the lower part of Pritom’ye (the end of XIX – the first quarter of XX century). Omsk: Omsk Pedagogical University Publishing house.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2017). Accessed 22 Aug 2017.
  32. Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-earth: Our planet’s fight for life. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander A. Erofeev
    • 1
  • Sergey G. Kopysov
    • 1
  1. 1.Tomsk State University, Tomsk State University of Architecture and BuildingTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations