Advertisement

Phase II: Designing Operations

  • Urs JägerEmail author
  • Felipe Symmes
  • Guillermo Cardoza
Chapter

Abstract

Negotiating impact for the resources needed to scale can influence a social enterprise’s supply (how to move inputs from suppliers to the social enterprise to produce products and services), distribution (how the products and services reach the customer/beneficiary), and revenue processes (how the customer/beneficiary pays for them). On one hand, social enterprises link their operations and revenue processes by creating products and services and distributing them to their target customers. On the other hand, they link these processes via revenue systems to current and potential customers who can pay for these services. These were explored in Phase I, by listing actors with whom the social enterprise can negotiate impact for resources. Social entrepreneurs design efficient and effective operations that can help deliver the impacts that are most of interest to both potential customers or beneficiaries and impact investors. The goal is to reduce operating costs in order to design self-sustaining business models. Apart from streamlining operations, social enterprises also design a revenue process. Some choose to provide products or services to customers who can pay at least a minimal price and are positively impacted by the product or service they purchase. Others have traditional (non-impact) customers and, rather, serve beneficiaries by including them as employees or providers in their business’s value chain. In either case, social entrepreneurs must carefully design pricing and payment processes for their target customers. The elements analyzed in this phase are: supply and assets, products and services, and distribution and revenue.

References

  1. 1.
    Mentzer, J. T., Dewitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hockerts, K., & Agrawal, A. (2018). Impact investing: Review and research agenda. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. Published online 31 January 2019.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Son, H., Lee, J., & Chung, Y. (2017). Value creation mechanism of social enterprises in manufacturing industry: Empirical evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(46), 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2019). Innovation and scaling for impact: How effective social enterprises do it (256 pp.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pentland, B. T., & Reuter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Nations Development Program. (2015–2016). Más allá del conflicto, luchas por el bienestar (Chapter 9, p. 259). National Human Development Report, Guatemala.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INCAE Business School & VIVA IdeaAlajuelaCosta Rica
  2. 2.Viva IdeaSan JoséCosta Rica
  3. 3.INCAE Business SchoolAlajuelaCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations