Skip to main content

‘A New We’: Post-Individualistic Community-Based Initiatives as Social Innovations? Empirical Observations in Intentional Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Community through Transdisciplinary Research

Abstract

Sociologists largely discuss ‘community’ and ‘individual’ as antonyms, arguing that modernity has led to an erosion of community. Indeed, individualisation has been a one-sided development that has not been accompanied by the emergence of a new mode of commonality. Against this sociocultural background, ‘intentional communities’ have been increasingly developed in the past decades in the USA and in Europe as an attempt to revive social values like responsible interaction and binding commonality. However, only about 5% of these initiatives reach the stage of a community with shared property and a communal mode of living. Amongst the reasons for the failure of intentional communities are the negative side effects of individualisation and the individualised socialisation of people in the West. In this chapter, Iris Kunze discusses her research on social innovation initiatives. She interprets these movements as a reinvention of more communal social relations, which aim to ‘heal’ the ‘social poverty’ in industrialised countries. Offering new modes of community that allow for individual freedom, these social innovation initiatives provide laboratories that work as a silent innovation in the process of societal transformation. Based on her empirical research, Kunze outlines patterns, principles, and best practices how to reinvent community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swindler, and Steven Tipton. 1991. The Good Society. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, Klaus Hock, and Thomas Klie, eds. 2012. Religionshybride: Religion in posttraditionalen Kontexten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, Peter, ed. 1991. Landgemeinde und Stadtgemeinde in Mitteleuropa: Ein struktureller Vergleich. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, Stephan. 2002. “‘Gemeinschaft’ in der ‘deutschen Soziologie’.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31 (5): 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Susan Love. 2002. “Community as Cultural Critique.” In Intentional Community: An Anthropological Perspective, edited by Brown, 153–179. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, Diane Leaf. 2003. Creating a Life Together: Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1990) 1997. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitru, Adina, Isabel Lema-Blanco, Ricardo-García Mira, Iris Kunze, Tim Strasser, and René Kemp. 2016. Social Learning for Transformative Social Innovation (TRANSIT Deliverable 2.3), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2003.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, September 30. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFs/238%20TRANSIT%20deliverable%20D2%203%20Social%20learning%20for%20TSI.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, Matthias, ed. 2018. Gesellschaft von unten!? Studien zur Formierung zivilgesellschaftlicher Graswurzelinitiativen. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, Matthias, Thomas Dierschke, Stephan Drucks, and Iris Kunze, eds. 2006. Soziale Gemeinschaften: Experimentierfelder für kollektive Lebensformen. Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. (1981) 1987. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausknost, Daniel, Willi Haas, Sabine Hielscher, Martina Schäfer, Michaela Leitner, Iris Kunze, and Mandl Sylvia. 2018. “Investigating Patterns of Local Climate Governance: How Low‐Carbon Municipalities and Intentional Communities Intervene in Social Practices.” Environmental Policy and Governance 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haxeltine, Alexander, Bonno Pel, Julia Wittmayer, Adina Dumitru, René Kemp, and Flor Avelino. 2017. “Building a Middle-Range Theory of Transformative Social Innovation: Theoretical Pitfalls and Methodological Responses.” European Public and Social Innovation Review 2 (1): 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haxeltine, Alexander, Flor Avelino, Bonno Pel, Adina Dumitru, René Kemp, Noel Longhurst, Jason Chilvers, and Julia M. Wittmayer. 2016. A Framework for Transformative Social Innovation (TRANSIT Working Paper 5), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, November 5. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFP/240%20TRANSIT_WorkingPaper_no5_TSI%20framework_Haxeltine%20et%20al_November2016_AH041116.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Hitzler, Ronald, Anne Honer, and Michaela Pfadenhauer, eds. 2009. Posttraditionale Gemeinschaften: Theoretische und ethnografische Bestimmungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard, Flor Avelino, Jens Dorland, Sarah Rach, and Julia Wittmayer. 2016. Synthesis Across Social Innovation Case Studies (TRANSIT Deliverable 4.4), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, March 31. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFP/207%20TRANSIT_D4.4_Synthesis%20Report%20about%20all%20in-depth%20case%20studies.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Kunze, Iris. 2006. “Sozialökologische Gemeinschaften als Experimentierfelder für zukunftsfähige Lebensweisen: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Praktiken.” In Soziale Gemeinschaften. Experimentierfelder für kollektive Lebensformen, edited by Matthias Grundmann et al., 171–188. Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, Iris. 2009. “Soziale Innovationen für zukunftsfähige Lebensweisen: Gemeinschaften und Ökodörfer als experimentierende Lernfelder für sozial-ökologische Nachhaltigkeit.” PhD diss., University of Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, Iris. 2012. “Social Innovations for Communal and Ecological Living: Lessons from Sustainability Research and Observations in Intentional Communities.” Communal Societies. Journal of the Communal Studies Association 32 (1): 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, Iris. 2019. “Soziale Innovationen aus Gemeinschaftsinitiativen: Grundlagen für eine gemeinwohlorientierte Ökonomie.” In Jenseits von Wachstum und Nutzenmaximierung: Modelle für eine gemeinwohlorientierte Wirtschaft, edited by Ines Peper, Iris Kunze und Elisabeth Mollenhauer-Klüber. Bielefeld: Aithesis Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, Iris, and Flor Avelino. 2015. Social Innovation and the Global Ecovillage Network (Transit Research Report), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.32-1 Grant agreement no: 613169. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFs/192%20Case_study_report_GEN_FINAL.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Lockyer, Joshua. 2007. “Sustainability and Utopianism: An Ethnography of Cultural Critique in Contemporary Intentional Communities.” PhD diss., University of Athens, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, Noel, Flor Avelino, Julia Wittmayer, Paul Weaver, Adina Dumitru, Sabine Hielscher, Carla Cipolla, Rita Afonso, Iris Kunze, and Morten Elle. 2016. “Experimenting with Alternative Economies: Four Emergent Counter-Narratives of Urban Economic Development.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijering, Louise. 2006. “Making a Place of Their Own: Rural Intentional Communities in Northwest Europe.” PhD diss., University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, Bill, and Diana Christian. 2003. “Intentional Communities.” In Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, edited by Karen Christensen and David Levinson, 670–676. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert. 1990. The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Morgan Scott. (1987) 2005. The Different Drum: The Creation of True Community—The First Step to World Peace. London: Arrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pel, Bonno, Tom Bauler, Flor Avelino, Julia Backhaus, Saskia Ruijsink, Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, Iris Kunze, G. Voss, Adina Dumitru, Isabel Lema-Blanco, Rita Afonso, Carla Cipolla, Noel Longhurst, Jens Dorland, Morten Elle, Balint Balázs, J. Horváth, Reka Matolay, Julia Wittmayer, A. Valderrama Pineda, Bibiana Serpa, M. Rösing Agostini, F. Lajarthe, S. Garrido, Facundo Picabea, J. Moreira, Florencia Trentini, Augistín Bidinost, Paul Weaver, R. Heimann, C. Skropke, K. L. Hoffmeister, Donia Tawakol, Veronica Olivotto, A. Tsatsou, Y. Zahed, R. Moet, Linda Zuijderwijk, Jesse Renema, and René Kemp. 2017a. The Critical Turning Points Database; Concept, Methodology and Dataset of an International Transformative Social Innovation Comparison (TRANSIT Working Paper 10), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, July 12. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFs/263%20CTPdatabase_TRANSIT_WorkingPaper10_FINAL_BP120717.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Pel, Bonno, Adina Dumitru, René Kemp, Alexander Haxeltine, Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, Flor Avelino, Iris Kunze, Jens Dorland, Julia Wittmayer, and Tom Bauler. 2017b. Synthesis Report: Meta-Analysis of Critical Turning Points in TSI (TRANSIT Deliverable 5.4), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, March 3. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFP/259%20TRANSIT%20D5.4.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2018.

  • Pitzer, Donald E. 1989. “Developmental Communalism: An Alternative Approach to Communal Studies.” In Utopian Thought and Communal Experience, edited by Dennis Hardy and Lorna Davidson, 68–76. Middlesex, England: Middlesex Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prisching, Manfred. 2008. „Paradoxien der Vergemeinschaftung.“ In Posttraditionale Gemeinschaften: Theoretische und ethnografische Erkundungen, edited by Ronald Hitzler, Anne Honer, and Michaela Pfadenhauer, 34–54. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Marshall B. (2001) 2005. Gewaltfreie Kommunikation. Paderborn: Junfermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenker, Barry. 1986. Intentional Communities: Ideology and Alienation in Communal Societies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian, Mariano Fressoli, Dinesh Abrol, Elisa Arond, and Adrian Ely. 2016. Grassroots Innovation Movements. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, Ferdinand. (1887) 1963. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veciana, Stella, and Kariin Ottmar. 2018. “Inner Conflict Resolution and Self-Empowerment as Contribution for Personal Sustainability on the Case of Intentional Community Practices.” In Personal Sustainability—Exploring the Far Side of Sustainable Development, edited by Oliver Parodi and Kaidi Tamm, 116–135. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Felix. 2012. “A Culture of Sustainability.” In Realizing Utopia: Ecovillage Endeavors and Academic Approaches, edited by Marcus Andreas, and Felix Wagner, RCC Perspectives (8). http://www.environmentandsociety.org/sites/default/files/a_culture_of_sustainability_0.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2018.

  • Weber, Max. (1922) 1964. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmayer, J., J. Backhaus, F. Avelino, B. Bel, T. Strasser, I. Kunze, and L. Zuijderwijk. 2019. “Narratives of Change: How Social Innovation Initiatives Construct Social Transformation.” Futures 112: 102433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Kunze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kunze, I. (2020). ‘A New We’: Post-Individualistic Community-Based Initiatives as Social Innovations? Empirical Observations in Intentional Communities. In: Jansen, B. (eds) Rethinking Community through Transdisciplinary Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31073-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics